World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7778 7475 736 732 131 5989

Qing Xiong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Qing Xiong between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Qing Xiong published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 14 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
1994 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Qing Xiong: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 8
2009 13
2010 8
2011 7
2012 10
2013 5
2014 5
2015 5
2016 14
2017 18
2018 19
2019 18
2020 28
2021 18
2022 8
2023 10
2024 5
2025 9
Total 209
Download as CSV

Qing Xiong publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qing Xiong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 131 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 131
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Qing Xiong D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qing Xiong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Qing Xiong is a researcher affiliated with Chongqing University in China, specializing in Earth and Planetary Sciences with a primary focus on Geophysics. Their work encompasses significant contributions to high-pressure geophysics and materials, earthquake and tectonic studies, and geological and geochemical analysis.

The scientist has a robust publication record with frequent contributions to several key journals and conference proceedings. The most common venues for their publications include:

  • Lithos
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Petrology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology

Qing Xiong's research output covers main fields such as Earth and Planetary Sciences, with subfields spanning Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, Geology, and Molecular Biology. Their work notably intersects multiple topics related to the study of Earth's structure and processes, including:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Geochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Qing Xiong has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, indicating interdisciplinary and cooperative research efforts. Key collaborators include:

  • Hong-Kun Dai
  • Jianping Zheng
  • Xiang Zhou
  • William L. Griffin

Representative publications authored by Qing Xiong or featuring their research contributions demonstrate a consistent focus on lithospheric processes and mantle composition. Select recent papers are:

  • Vertical depletion of ophiolitic mantle reflects melt focusing and interaction in sub-spreading-center asthenosphere, 2022, Nature Communications
  • The complex life cycle of oceanic lithosphere: A study of Yarlung-Zangbo ophiolitic peridotites, Tibet, 2020, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Pyroxenite Xenoliths Record Complex Melt Impregnation in the Deep Lithosphere of the Northwestern North China Craton, 2020, Journal of Petrology
  • Deep lithosphere of the North China Craton archives the fate of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, 2021, Earth-Science Reviews
  • Lithospheric memory of subduction in mantle pyroxenite xenoliths from rift-related basalts, 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Best Publications

  • A single electrode room-temperature plasma jet device for biomedical applications

    XinPei Lu;ZhongHe Jiang;Qing Xiong;ZhiYuan Tang

  • An 11 cm long atmospheric pressure cold plasma plume for applications of plasma medicine

    XinPei Lu;ZhongHe Jiang;Qing Xiong;ZhiYuan Tang

  • The roles of the various plasma agents in the inactivation of bacteria

    XinPei Lu;Tao Ye;YingGuang Cao;ZiYong Sun

  • Zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotope of Quanyishang A-type granite in Yichang: signification for the Yangtze continental cratonization in Paleoproterozoic

    Qing Xiong;JianPing Zheng;ChunMei Yu;YuPing Su

  • Mantle Recycling: Transition Zone Metamorphism of Tibetan Ophiolitic Peridotites and its Tectonic Implications

    William L Griffin;Juan C Afonso;Elena A Belousova;Sarah E Gain

  • Characterization of an atmospheric helium plasma jet by relative and absolute optical emission spectroscopy

    Qing Xiong;Qing Xiong;Anton Yu Nikiforov;Anton Yu Nikiforov;Manuel Á González;Christophe Leys

  • Southward trench migration at ~130-120 Ma caused accretion of the Neo-Tethyan forearc lithosphere in Tibetan ophiolites

    Qing Xiong;Qing Xiong;William L. Griffin;Jian Ping Zheng;Suzanne Y. O'Reilly

  • Length control of He atmospheric plasma jet plumes: Effects of discharge parameters and ambient air

    Qi Xiong;XinPei Lu;Ken Ostrikov;Z Xiong

  • Pulsed dc- and sine-wave-excited cold atmospheric plasma plumes: A comparative analysis

    Q. Xiong;X. P. Lu;K. Ostrikov;Y. Xian

  • Degradation of benzotriazole by DBD plasma and peroxymonosulfate: Mechanism, degradation pathway and potential toxicity

    Jiali Wu;Qing Xiong;Jialiang Liang;Qiang He

  • A simple atmospheric pressure room-temperature air plasma needle device for biomedical applications

    X. Lu;Z. Xiong;F. Zhao;Y. Xian

  • Ultrapotassic rocks and xenoliths from South Tibet: Contrasting styles of interaction between lithospheric mantle and asthenosphere during continental collision

    Bo Xu;Bo Xu;William L. Griffin;Qing Xiong;Zeng-Qian Hou

  • High-speed dispersed photographing of an open-air argon plasma plume by a grating-ICCD camera system

    Qing Xiong;Qing Xiong;Anton Nikiforov;Anton Nikiforov;XP Lu;Christophe Leys

  • Accretion and reworking beneath the North China Craton

    J.P. Zheng;W.L. Griffin;Q. Ma;S.Y. O'Reilly

  • A Novel DC Arc Fault Detection Method Based on Electromagnetic Radiation Signal

    Qing Xiong;Shengchang Ji;Lingyu Zhu;Lipeng Zhong

  • Zircons in the Shenglikou ultrahigh-pressure garnet peridotite massif and its country rocks from the North Qaidam terrane (western China): Meso-Neoproterozoic crust–mantle coupling and early Paleozoic convergent plate-margin processes

    Qing Xiong;Jianping Zheng;Jianping Zheng;William L. Griffin;Suzanne Y. O’Reilly

  • Temporal and spatial resolved optical emission behaviors of a cold atmospheric pressure plasma jet

    Q. Xiong;X. Lu;J. Liu;Y. Xian

  • Propagation of an atmospheric pressure plasma plume

    X. Lu;Q. Xiong;Z. Xiong;J. Hu

  • Absolute OH density determination by laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy in an atmospheric pressure RF plasma jet

    Q. Xiong;A. Yu. Nikiforov;A. Yu. Nikiforov;L. Li;P. Vanraes

  • A study on the temporally and spatially resolved OH radical distribution of a room-temperature atmospheric-pressure plasma jet by laser-induced fluorescence imaging

    X Pei;Y Lu;Y Lu;S Wu;Q Xiong

  • Influence of helium mole fraction distribution on the properties of cold atmospheric pressure helium plasma jets

    Ranhua Xiong;Qing Xiong;Anton Yu. Nikiforov;Patrick Vanraes

  • Linking continental deep subduction with destruction of a cratonic margin: strongly reworked North China SCLM intruded in the Triassic Sulu UHP belt

    J. P. Zheng;J. P. Zheng;H. Y. Tang;Q. Xiong;Q. Xiong;W. L. Griffin

Frequent Co-Authors

J. P. Zheng
J. P. Zheng China University of Geosciences, Wuhan
William L. Griffin
William L. Griffin Macquarie University
Suzanne Y. O'Reilly
Suzanne Y. O'Reilly Macquarie University
Kostya Ostrikov
Kostya Ostrikov Queensland University of Technology
Qing Huo Liu
Qing Huo Liu Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo
Norman J. Pearson
Norman J. Pearson Macquarie University
José María González-Jiménez
José María González-Jiménez University of Granada
Jun-Hong Zhao
Jun-Hong Zhao China University of Geosciences
Rony Snyders
Rony Snyders University of Mons
Olivier Alard
Olivier Alard Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens many doors, and pursuing related online degrees can provide flexibility and accessibility. For those interested in advancing education careers linked to environmental policy or education, exploring eds to edd bridge programs online offers a pathway from a master’s-level Education Specialist degree to a Doctor of Education, enhancing leadership skills in educational settings.

Another valuable option for career growth is the cheapest online dsw programs. These programs prepare professionals for advanced social work roles, which can intersect with environmental justice and community wellbeing.

For students seeking broad foundational knowledge to complement environmental studies, affordable options like cheapest online general studies degree programs provide interdisciplinary education with a flexible curriculum tailored to diverse interests and career goals.

Additionally, if quick entry into the workforce is a priority, exploring the easiest bachelor degree to get can help identify programs with streamlined requirements, allowing students to earn credentials efficiently while focusing on environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Qing Xiong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles