World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 48 365 365 9 9 159 8641
Psychology 51 5234 4855 245 241 151 10046

Ronny Redlich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ronny Redlich between 2012 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronny Redlich published across 14 years, from 2012 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2020. 25 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2020. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
2012 2025

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ronny Redlich: publications per year, 2012 to 2025
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 5
2014 6
2015 9
2016 8
2017 12
2018 13
2019 21
2020 27
2021 27
2022 10
2023 12
2024 11
2025 14
Total 176
Download as CSV

Ronny Redlich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronny Redlich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ronny Redlich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronny Redlich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Ronny Redlich is affiliated with the University of Münster in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, psychology, and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, as well as radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's research focuses primarily on functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, treatment of major depression, and advanced neuroimaging techniques. Other key areas include electroconvulsive therapy studies, investigations into anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and studies related to health, environment, and cognitive aging.

Recent publications by Ronny Redlich include the following:

  • Genetic variants associated with longitudinal changes in brain structure across the lifespan, 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • Quantifying Deviations of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder Across Neuroimaging Modalities, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Systematic misestimation of machine learning performance in neuroimaging studies of depression, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Subcortical shape alterations in major depressive disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-Based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder, 2024, JAMA Psychiatry

Ronny Redlich frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Udo Dannlowski
  • Nils Opel
  • Susanne Meinert
  • Dominik Grotegerd
  • Jonathan Repple

Best Publications

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder : findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    Tiffany C. Ho;Boris Gutman;Elena Pozzi;Hans J. Grabe

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder : An MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group

    D P Hibar;L T Westlye;L T Westlye;N T Doan;N T Doan;N Jahanshad

  • Brain morphometric biomarkers distinguishing unipolar and bipolar depression. A voxel-based morphometry-pattern classification approach.

    Ronny Redlich;Jorge J. R. Almeida;Dominik Grotegerd;Nils Opel

  • Childhood maltreatment is associated with an automatic negative emotion processing bias in the amygdala.

    Udo Dannlowski;Udo Dannlowski;Harald Kugel;Franziska Huber;Anja Stuhrmann

  • Prediction of Individual Response to Electroconvulsive Therapy via Machine Learning on Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data

    Ronny Redlich;Nils Opel;Dominik Grotegerd;Katharina Dohm

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • Hippocampal atrophy in major depression: a function of childhood maltreatment rather than diagnosis?

    Nils Opel;Ronny Redlich;Peter Zwanzger;Dominik Grotegerd

  • Quantifying Deviations of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder Across Neuroimaging Modalities.

    Unknown

  • Volume of the human Hippocampus and clinical response following Electroconvulsive Therapy

    Leif Oltedal;Katherine L. Narr;Christopher Abbott;Amit Anand

  • Obesity and major depression: Body-mass index (BMI) is associated with a severe course of disease and specific neurostructural alterations.

    Nils Opel;Ronny Redlich;Dominik Grotegerd;Katharina Dohm

  • Reward Processing in Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Functional MRI Study.

    Ronny Redlich;Katharina Dohm;Dominik Grotegerd;Nils Opel

  • Using structural MRI to identify bipolar disorders – 13 site machine learning study in 3020 individuals from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorders Working Group

    Abraham Nunes;Hugo G. Schnack;Christopher R.K. Ching;Christopher R.K. Ching;Ingrid Agartz

  • Mediation of the influence of childhood maltreatment on depression relapse by cortical structure: a 2-year longitudinal observational study

    Nils Opel;Ronny Redlich;Katharina Dohm;Dario Zaremba

  • Amygdala excitability to subliminally presented emotional faces distinguishes unipolar and bipolar depression: an fMRI and pattern classification study.

    Dominik Grotegerd;Anja Stuhrmann;Harald Kugel;Simone Schmidt

  • Mood-congruent amygdala responses to subliminally presented facial expressions in major depression: associations with anhedonia

    Anja Stuhrmann;Katharina Dohm;Harald Kugel;Peter Zwanzger

  • The Limbic System in Youth Depression: Brain Structural and Functional Alterations in Adolescent In-patients with Severe Depression

    Ronny Redlich;Nils Opel;Christian Bürger;Katharina Dohm

  • Systematic misestimation of machine learning performance in neuroimaging studies of depression.

    Claas Flint;Micah Cearns;Micah Cearns;Nils Opel;Ronny Redlich

  • Brain Changes Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy Are Broadly Distributed

    Olga Therese Ousdal;Miklos Argyelan;Katherine L. Narr;Christopher Abbott

  • Brain structural effects of treatments for depression and biomarkers of response: a systematic review of neuroimaging studies.

    Verena Enneking;Elisabeth J Leehr;Udo Dannlowski;Ronny Redlich

  • Disadvantage of Social Sensitivity: Interaction of Oxytocin Receptor Genotype and Child Maltreatment on Brain Structure

    Udo Dannlowski;Udo Dannlowski;Harald Kugel;Dominik Grotegerd;Ronny Redlich

  • Prefrontal gray matter volume mediates genetic risks for obesity.

    N Opel;R Redlich;C Kaehler;D Grotegerd

Frequent Co-Authors

Udo Dannlowski
Udo Dannlowski University of Münster
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Dominik Grotegerd
Dominik Grotegerd University of Münster
Jonathan Repple
Jonathan Repple University Hospital Frankfurt
Harald Kugel
Harald Kugel University of Münster
Axel Krug
Axel Krug Philipp University of Marburg
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Walter Heindel
Walter Heindel University of Münster
Volker Arolt
Volker Arolt University of Münster
Igor Nenadic
Igor Nenadic Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a versatile field, opening doors to a variety of specialized careers. With the growth of accredited online psychology programs, students can pursue their degrees with greater flexibility, often balancing studies with other commitments.

For those interested in the justice system, exploring how can i become a forensic psychologist provides insight into combining psychology with law enforcement and criminal investigation. Aspiring professionals may also consider the complex study of the brain and behavior, with resources available on how to become a neuropsychologist.

Some psychology majors choose the medical route. If you’re curious about the clinical pathway, understanding what degree does a psychiatrist need is a vital first step, as it involves medical school and specialized training.

Additionally, the growing interest in mental health within sports offers career opportunities in performance and rehabilitation. For an overview of the field and future prospects, read more about the sports psychologist job outlook.

Each specialization has unique educational and licensure requirements, so researching online programs that fit your career aspirations is essential.

Best Scientists Citing Ronny Redlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles