World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
29476
World Ranking
2459
National Ranking
222

Igor Nenadic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Igor Nenadic sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 324 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Igor Nenadic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Igor Nenadic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Igor Nenadic is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines within the broader fields of medicine, neuroscience, and psychology.

The scientist's work involves significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Main research topics covered by Igor Nenadic include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Frequent publication venues for Igor Nenadic are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Psychological Medicine

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Tilo Kircher
  • Udo Dannlowski
  • Frederike Stein
  • Susanne Meinert
  • Dominik Grotegerd

Selected recent publications by Igor Nenadic include:

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA, 2020, NeuroImage
  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing, 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • Quantifying Deviations of Brain Structure and Function in Major Depressive Disorder Across Neuroimaging Modalities, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Brain structural abnormalities in obesity: relation to age, genetic risk, and common psychiatric disorders, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: Findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group, 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Best Publications

  • Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Aiden Corvin;James T. R. Walters

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Subcortical brain alterations in major depressive disorder : findings from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group

    Tiffany C. Ho;Boris Gutman;Elena Pozzi;Hans J. Grabe

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group

    Laura S. van Velzen;Sinead Kelly;Sinead Kelly;Dmitry Isaev;Andre Aleman

  • Neuroanatomy of ‘Hearing Voices’: A Frontotemporal Brain Structural Abnormality Associated with Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia

    Christian Gaser;Igor Nenadic;Hans-Peter Volz;Christian Büchel

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.

    Joaquim Radua;Eduard Vieta;Russell Shinohara;Peter Kochunov

  • BrainAGE score indicates accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder.

    Igor Nenadić;Maren Dietzek;Kerstin Langbein;Heinrich Sauer

  • Local cortical surface complexity maps from spherical harmonic reconstructions.

    Rachel Aine Yotter;Igor Nenadic;Gabriel Ziegler;Paul M. Thompson

  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders

    Yash Patel;Nadine Parker;Jean Shin;Derek Howard

  • ENIGMA MDD: seven years of global neuroimaging studies of major depression through worldwide data sharing

    Lianne Schmaal;Elena Pozzi;Tiffany C Ho;Tiffany C Ho;Laura S van Velzen

  • Processing of temporal information and the basal ganglia: new evidence from fMRI

    Igor Nenadic;Christian Gaser;Hans-Peter Volz;Thomas Rammsayer

  • Reduced cortical thickness in first episode schizophrenia

    C. Christoph Schultz;Kathrin Koch;Gerd Wagner;Martin Roebel

  • Hypofrontality in unmedicated schizophrenia patients studied with PET during performance of a serial verbal learning task.

    Erin A Hazlett;Monte S Buchsbaum;Lily Ann Jeu;Igor Nenadic

  • White matter abnormalities and brain activation in schizophrenia: A combined DTI and fMRI study

    Ralf G.M. Schlösser;Igor Nenadic;Igor Nenadic;Gerd Wagner;Daniel Güllmar

  • Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia related to volume reduction of the thalamus, striatum, and superior temporal cortex

    Christian Gaser;Igor Nenadic;Bradley R. Buchsbaum;Erin A. Hazlett

  • Time estimation in schizophrenia: an fMRI study at adjusted levels of difficulty.

    Hans-Peter Volz;Igor Nenadic;Christian Gaser;Thomas Rammsayer

  • Neurobiology of the major psychoses: a translational perspective on brain structure and function-the FOR2107 consortium.

    Tilo Kircher;Markus Wöhr;Igor Nenadic;Rainer Schwarting

  • Deformation-based morphometry and its relation to conventional volumetry of brain lateral ventricles in MRI.

    Christian Gaser;Igor Nenadic;Bradley R. Buchsbaum;Erin A. Hazlett

  • Subcortical shape alterations in major depressive disorder: Findings from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group

    Unknown

  • Default mode network activity in schizophrenia studied at resting state using probabilistic ICA

    Gianluca Mingoia;Gerd Wagner;Kerstin Langbein;Raka Maitra

  • Thalamocortical connectivity during resting state in schizophrenia

    Carsten M. Klingner;Kerstin Langbein;Maren Dietzek;Stefan Smesny

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel Krug
Axel Krug Philipp University of Marburg
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Udo Dannlowski
Udo Dannlowski University of Münster
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster
Christian Gaser
Christian Gaser Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Dominik Grotegerd
Dominik Grotegerd University of Münster
Heinrich Sauer
Heinrich Sauer University of Giessen
Sven Cichon
Sven Cichon University of Basel
Andreas Jansen
Andreas Jansen Philipp University of Marburg
Markus M. Nöthen
Markus M. Nöthen University Hospital Bonn

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many choose to pair their neuroscience studies with social work or psychology to broaden their career prospects. Options such as an accelerated social work degree can prepare you for roles that address both clinical and community mental health needs.

Those looking to deeply understand human behavior might consider colleges with accelerated psychology programs. These fast-tracked programs allow you to gain essential psychological knowledge and skills with the flexibility of online study, enabling quicker entry into the workforce or advanced study.

If counseling is your passion, choosing a program from cacrep accredited schools is crucial for eligibility in many licensure paths. Accredited programs are recognized for their academic quality, ensuring you meet industry standards.

Finally, a wide variety of online mental health degree programs also offer affordable and flexible options for those prioritizing cost and convenience. These degrees can lead to diverse roles in counseling, therapy, and behavioral health, complementing your neuroscience background.

Best Scientists Citing Igor Nenadic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles