World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
12564
World Ranking
16019
National Ranking
1266

Michael R. Barer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Barer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 195 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael R. Barer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Barer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. Barer is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable concentration in infectious diseases, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and epidemiology. Barer's work also touches on molecular biology and surgery.

The scientist's major topics of study include tuberculosis research and epidemiology, infection control and ventilation, Mycobacterium research and diagnosis, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, pneumonia and respiratory infections, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research.

Frequent co-authors in Barer's research include Manish Pareek, Caroline Williams, Daniel Pan, Shirley Sze, and Christopher E. Brightling.

Barer has contributed to several prominent publication venues, such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Microbe
  • Journal of Infection
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Nature Communications

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael R. Barer include:

  • Inflammatory Endotype-associated Airway Microbiome in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Clinical Stability and Exacerbations: A Multicohort Longitudinal Analysis, 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis output and detection of subclinical disease by face-mask sampling: prospective observational studies, 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Lung microbiome composition and bronchial epithelial gene expression in patients with COPD versus healthy individuals: a bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and host transcriptomic analysis, 2021, The Lancet Microbe
  • The sputum microbiome is distinct between COPD and health, independent of smoking history, 2020, Respiratory Research
  • Transmission of monkeypox/mpox virus: A narrative review of environmental, viral, host, and population factors in relation to the 2022 international outbreak, 2023, Journal of Medical Virology

Best Publications

  • Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Identification of Biologic Clusters and Their Biomarkers

    Mona Bafadhel;Susan McKenna;Sarah Terry;Vijay Mistry

  • Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues

    Douglas B. Kell;Arseny S. Kaprelyants;Arseny S. Kaprelyants;Dieter H. Weichart;Colin R. Harwood

  • Blood Eosinophils to Direct Corticosteroid Treatment of Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Mona Bafadhel;Susan McKenna;Sarah Terry;Vijay Mistry

  • Cytological and Transcript Analyses Reveal Fat and Lazy Persister-Like Bacilli in Tuberculous Sputum

    Natalie J. Garton;Simon J. Waddell;Anna L Sherratt;Su Min Lee

  • Bacterial viability and culturability.

    Michael R. Barer;Colin R. Harwood

  • Toxin gene expression by shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: the role of antibiotics and the bacterial SOS response.

    Patrick T. Kimmitt;Colin R. Harwood;Michael R. Barer

  • Lung microbiome dynamics in COPD exacerbations

    Zhang Wang;Mona Bafadhel;Koirobi Haldar;Koirobi Haldar;Aaron Spivak

  • Characterization of the bacterial consortium associated with black band disease in coral using molecular microbiological techniques.

    Rory P Cooney;Olga Pantos;Martin D A Le Tissier;Michael R Barer

  • Targeting Persisters for Tuberculosis Control

    Ying Zhang;Wing Wai Yew;Michael R. Barer

  • Resuscitation-promoting factors reveal an occult population of tubercle Bacilli in Sputum.

    Galina V. Mukamolova;Obolbek Turapov;Joanne Malkin;Gerrit Woltmann

  • The bacterial ecology of a plague-like disease affecting the Caribbean coral Montastrea annularis.

    Olga Pantos;Rory P. Cooney;Martin D. A. Le Tissier;Michael R. Barer

  • Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein in Hospitalized Adult Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia or Exacerbation of Asthma or COPD

    Mona Bafadhel;Tristan W. Clark;Carlene Reid;Marie-jo Medina

  • Intracellular lipophilic inclusions of mycobacteria in vitro and in sputum

    Natalie J. Garton;Henriette Christensen;David E. Minnikin;Richard A. Adegbola

  • Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidising bacterial communities in wastewater treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater.

    Arlene K. Rowan;Jason R. Snape;David Fearnside;Michael R. Barer

  • Biofilms in drinking water systems: a possible reservoir for Helicobacter pylori

    W.G. Mackay;L.T. Gribbon;M.R. Barer;D.C. Reid

  • THE VIABLE BUT NON-CULTURABLE HYPOTHESIS AND MEDICAL BACTERIOLOGY

    M. R. Barer;L. T. Gribbon;C. R. Harwood;C. E. Nwoguh

  • Factors affecting the selection and use of tetrazolium salts as cytochemical indicators of microbial viability and activity

    Susan M. Thom;R.W. Horobin;E. Seidler;M.R. Barer

  • Biological exacerbation clusters demonstrate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap with distinct mediator and microbiome profiles.

    Michael A. Ghebre;Pee Hwee Pang;Sarah Diver;Dhananjay Desai

  • Lipid domains of mycobacteria studied with fluorescent molecular probes

    Henriette Christensen;Natalie J. Garton;Richard W. Horobin;David E. Minnikin

  • A deletion defining a common Asian lineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis associates with immune subversion

    Sandra M. Newton;Rebecca J. Smith;Katalin A. Wilkinson;Katalin A. Wilkinson;Mark P. Nicol

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher E. Brightling
Christopher E. Brightling University of Leicester
Karl G. Nicholson
Karl G. Nicholson University of Leicester
Keith R. Abrams
Keith R. Abrams University of Leicester
Maria Zambon
Maria Zambon Public Health England
Ian D. Pavord
Ian D. Pavord University of Oxford
Martin Antonio
Martin Antonio London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Ivo Gut
Ivo Gut Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico
Peter W. Andrew
Peter W. Andrew University of Leicester
Marco R. Oggioni
Marco R. Oggioni University of Leicester
Colin R. Harwood
Colin R. Harwood Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your studies in Biology and Biochemistry can open diverse professional pathways, many of which now offer flexible online learning options. Students interested in applying their knowledge to the world of healthcare and medications might consider exploring the best online pharmacy school programs. These advanced degrees equip graduates for specialized pharmacy roles in clinical, research, or retail settings.

For those drawn to human physiology and performance, pursuing an exercise science degree online or investigating online kinesiology degrees can prepare you for rewarding careers in sports medicine, wellness coaching, and rehabilitation.

Additionally, students seeking advanced practice in mental health nursing may be interested in the shortest post master's pmhnp online programs. These programs provide a quick pathway for nurses to specialize in psychiatric-mental health.

With so many online options available, you can find a program that fits your career goals and schedule, while gaining skills highly sought after in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Barer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles