World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
49215
World Ranking
6956
National Ranking
676

Keith R. Abrams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith R. Abrams sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 470 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Keith R. Abrams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith R. Abrams sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith R. Abrams is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a significant focus on related subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, Statistics and Probability, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and General Health Professions.

Their research topics address a range of issues such as Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Employment and Welfare Studies, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Recent scientific contributions include papers such as:

  • Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, EClinicalMedicine)
  • Life Expectancy in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (2021, Neurology)
  • Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • Comparing associations between frailty and mortality in hospitalised older adults with or without COVID-19 infection: a retrospective observational study using electronic health records (2020, Age and Ageing)
  • Association of maternal lipid profile and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 292 studies and 97,880 women (2021, EClinicalMedicine)

Their frequent co-authors include Laura J. Gray, Sylwia Bujkiewicz, Manish Pareek, Rhiannon K Owen, and Kamlesh Khunti, reflecting collaborative research efforts across several projects.

Keith R. Abrams has published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Value in Health
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • BMJ Open
  • EClinicalMedicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis

    J A Eaden;K R Abrams;J F Mayberry

  • Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Keith R. Abrams;Jonathan P. Myles

  • Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis

    Jaime L. Peters;Alex J. Sutton;David R. Jones;Keith R. Abrams

  • Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry

    Jaime L. Peters;Alex J. Sutton;David R. Jones;Keith R. Abrams

  • Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Clare Louise Gillies;Keith R. Abrams;Paul C. Lambert;Nicola J. Cooper

  • Colorectal cancer prevention in ulcerative colitis: a case-control study.

    J Eaden;K Abrams;A Ekbom;E Jackson

  • Meta-analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn's disease.

    C. Canavan;K. R. Abrams;J. Mayberry

  • Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research

    Richard D. Riley;Jill A. Hayden;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Karel G. M. Moons

  • Rescue Angioplasty after Failed Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Anthony H. Gershlick;Amanda Stephens-Lloyd;Sarah Hughes;Keith R. Abrams

  • Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between‐study heterogeneity

    Jaime L. Peters;Alex J. Sutton;David R. Jones;Keith R. Abrams

  • Quality of life and survival with continuous hepatic-artery floxuridine infusion for colorectal liver metastases

    T.G Allen-Mersh;S Earlam;C Fordy;K Abrams

  • Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 1: A framework for researching clinical outcomes

    Harry Hemingway;Peter Croft;Pablo Perel;Jill A Hayden

  • How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.

    Paul C. Lambert;Alex J. Sutton;Paul R. Burton;Keith R. Abrams

  • Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Shirley Sze;Daniel Pan;Clareece R. Nevill;Laura J. Gray

  • Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Keith R. Abrams;Jonathan P. Myles

  • Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

    M. A. Memon;N. J. Cooper;B. Memon;M. I. Memon

  • Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research

    Aroon D Hingorani;Daniëlle A van der Windt;Richard D Riley;Keith Abrams

  • Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Jonathan P. Myles;David R. Jones;Keith R. Abrams

  • Effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors in treatment and prevention of influenza A and B: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

    Nicola J Cooper;Alexander J Sutton;Keith R Abrams;Allan Wailoo

  • Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Shirley Sze;Daniel Pan;Laura J Gray;Clareece R Nevill

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl G. Nicholson
Karl G. Nicholson University of Leicester
Mark Sculpher
Mark Sculpher University of York
John R. Thompson
John R. Thompson University of Leicester
David Spiegelhalter
David Spiegelhalter UK Statistics Authority
Maria Zambon
Maria Zambon Public Health England
Michael R. Barer
Michael R. Barer University of Leicester
Kamlesh Khunti
Kamlesh Khunti University of Leicester
Harry Hemingway
Harry Hemingway University College London
Kenneth J. O'Byrne
Kenneth J. O'Byrne Queensland University of Technology
Melanie J. Davies
Melanie J. Davies University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals in the USA have a variety of online degree options beyond the traditional MD path. Many students select programs that align with their desired roles or offer faster, more flexible entry into the workforce.

For example, those seeking to advance in nursing can consider online dnp programs without clinicals, which offer a streamlined doctoral path for nurses who want to avoid the challenges of completing clinical requirements. Similarly, accelerated tracks such as fast track lpn programs make it possible to become a practical nurse and start working in healthcare sooner.

Specialized professionals, like psychiatric nurse practitioners, often seek high-demand credentials through the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program online. For those interested in the administrative side, a health care administration degree online can be a cost-effective way to access leadership opportunities in hospitals, clinics, and related organizations.

Exploring these alternatives can help students find a healthcare career path that suits their personal goals, timeline, and learning preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Keith R. Abrams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles