World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
46340
World Ranking
12436
National Ranking
506

Pierre Côté publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Côté sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 449 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Pierre Côté D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Côté sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre Côté is affiliated with the University of Ontario Institute of Technology in Canada. Their work predominantly focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields including Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main research topics covered by Pierre Côté reflect a strong emphasis on musculoskeletal conditions and associated rehabilitation, as well as broader health system evaluations. Key topics in their publications include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Occupational Health and Performance

Frequently publishing in venues related to musculoskeletal health, rehabilitation, and clinical research, Pierre Côté has contributed notably to:

  • Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
  • Brain and Spine
  • Pain
  • European Spine Journal
  • BMJ Open

Collaborations form a substantial part of Pierre Côté's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Silvano Mior
  • Jessica J. Wong
  • Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
  • Carol Cancelliere
  • Margareta Nordin

Among recent publications demonstrating the breadth of their research interests are the following works:

  • "Impact of COVID-19 on routine immunisation in South-East Asia and Western Pacific: Disruptions and solutions," 2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
  • "Recommendations for the development, implementation, and reporting of control interventions in efficacy and mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and self-management therapies: the CoPPS Statement," 2023, BMJ
  • "Associations Between Procrastination and Subsequent Health Outcomes Among University Students in Sweden," 2023, JAMA Network Open
  • "Association Between Depressive Symptoms or Depression and Health Outcomes for Low Back Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis," 2021, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • "A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Persons With Non-specific Low Back Pain With and Without Radiculopathy: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation," 2023, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • Circulating microRNAs in sera correlate with soluble biomarkers of immune activation but do not predict mortality in ART treated individuals with HIV-1 infection : a case control study

    Daniel D. Murray;Kazuo Suzuki;Matthew Law;Jonel Trebicka

  • Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors

    Jill A Hayden;Danielle A van der Windt;Jennifer L Cartwright;Pierre Côté

  • The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

    Pierre Côté;Gabrielle van der Velde;J. David Cassidy;Linda J. Carroll

  • Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.

    Jill A Hayden;Pierre Côté;Claire Bombardier

  • The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson;Gabrielle van der Velde;Linda J. Carroll;Lena W. Holm

  • The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults.

    P Côté;J D Cassidy;L Carroll

  • Treatment of Neck Pain: Noninvasive Interventions: Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders

    Eric L. Hurwitz;Eugene J. Carragee;Gabrielle van der Velde;Linda J. Carroll

  • Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

    Linda J. Carroll;Lena W. Holm;Sheilah Hogg-Johnson;Pierre Côtè

  • The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in the General Population

    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson;Gabrielle van der Velde;Linda J. Carroll;Lena W. Holm

  • Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury

    J D Cassidy;L J Carroll;P Côté;M Lemstra

  • Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

    Linda J. Carroll;Sheilah Hogg-Johnson;Gabrielle van der Velde;Scott Haldeman;Scott Haldeman

  • The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study

    Pierre Côté;J. David Cassidy;J. David Cassidy;Linda J. Carroll;Vicki Kristman

  • A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders

    Jaime Guzman;Eric L. Hurwitz;Linda J. Carroll;Scott Haldeman;Scott Haldeman

  • Risk of Vertebrobasilar Stroke and Chiropractic Care: Results of a Population-Based Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study

    J. David Cassidy;J. David Cassidy;Eleanor Boyle;Pierre Côté;Yaohua He

  • Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?

    Vicki Kristman;Michael Manno;Pierre Côté

  • Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.

    Margareta Nordin;Eugene J. Carragee;Sheilah Hogg-Johnson;Shira Schecter Weiner

  • Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature.

    Carol Cancelliere;Carol Cancelliere;J David Cassidy;J David Cassidy;Carlo Ammendolia;Carlo Ammendolia;Pierre Côté;Pierre Côté

  • The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies

    Eric L. Hurwitz;Kristi Randhawa;Hainan Yu;Pierre Côté

  • The Burden and Determinants of Neck Pain in Workers

    Pierre Côté;Gabrielle van der Velde;J. David Cassidy;J. David Cassidy;J. David Cassidy;Linda J. Carroll

  • The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain survey : The prevalence of low Back Pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Point of view

    J. D. Cassidy;L. J. Carroll;P. Cote;M. Heliövaara

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda J. Carroll
Linda J. Carroll University of Alberta
J. David Cassidy
J. David Cassidy University of Toronto
Margareta Nordin
Margareta Nordin New York University
Eugene J. Carragee
Eugene J. Carragee Stanford University
Jean-Pierre Routy
Jean-Pierre Routy McGill University Health Centre
John Frank
John Frank University of Edinburgh
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Gillian A. Hawker
Gillian A. Hawker University of Toronto
Roger Chou
Roger Chou Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The path to practicing medicine in the USA is highly competitive, but many students explore related online degrees and career pathways in healthcare. Modern online education provides flexibility and affordability for advancing your career, whether you're just starting or building on previous qualifications.

For those interested in becoming a nurse practitioner, it's possible to find the cheapest np school options online. If you’re seeking to become a registered nurse or boost your existing credentials, numerous affordable online nursing programs are available nationwide.

Nurses looking to achieve the highest levels of education can consider the cheapest online dnp programs. Additionally, registered nurses hoping to advance into management roles or specialized practice can benefit from learning about rn to bsn online cost and program options.

Exploring these routes can offer opportunities to grow within the healthcare field and may serve as a stepping stone toward or alongside studying Medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Côté

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles