World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27569
World Ranking
13654
National Ranking
451

Arianne P. Verhagen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arianne P. Verhagen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 370 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Arianne P. Verhagen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arianne P. Verhagen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arianne P. Verhagen is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their research spans a significant body of work within the field of Medicine, with particular focus on subfields such as Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The primary research topics covered in Verhagen's work include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Among the recent papers associated with or relevant to Verhagen's field, the following publications stand out:

  • Risk factors for overuse injuries in short- and long-distance running: A systematic review (2020), Journal of Sport and Health Science
  • Physiotherapy management of neck pain (2020), Journal of Physiotherapy
  • Diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests for cervical radiculopathy (2020), Physiotherapy
  • Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2021), Journal of Physiotherapy
  • Lack of Consensus Across Clinical Guidelines Regarding the Role of Psychosocial Factors Within Low Back Pain Care: A Systematic Review (2021), Journal of Pain

Verhagen's collaboration network includes several frequent co-authors, indicating ongoing partnerships in research activities. These co-authors are:

  • Rafael Zambelli Pinto
  • Jean-Michel Brismée
  • Alan M. Jette
  • Mark R. Elkins
  • Anne Söderlund

Their research is regularly published in established venues, reflecting their engagement with specialized audiences in their disciplines. The venues with the highest frequency of their publications include:

  • Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
  • Journal of Physiotherapy
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
  • Physiotherapy

Best Publications

  • The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.

    Arianne P. Verhagen;Henrica C.W. de Vet;Robert A. de Bie;Alphons G.H. Kessels

  • Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review.

    Jolanda Luime;Bart Koes;I. J M Hendriksen;Alex Burdorf

  • A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain

    Marienke van Middelkoop;Sidney M Rubinstein;Ton Kuijpers;Arianne P Verhagen

  • Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain

    Marienke van Middelkoop;Sidney M. Rubinstein;Arianne P. Verhagen;Raymond W. Ostelo;Raymond W. Ostelo

  • Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.

    Gwendolijne G.M Scholten-Peeters;Arianne P Verhagen;Geertruida E Bekkering;Daniëlle A.W.M van der Windt

  • Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis

    Reinoud W Brouwer;Maarten R Huizinga;Tijs Duivenvoorden;Tom M van Raaij

  • Influence of obesity on the development of osteoarthritis of the hip: a systematic review.

    A. M. Lievense;S. M. A. Bierma‐Zeinstra;A. P. Verhagen;M. E. van Baar

  • Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic review

    Wilco C H Jacobs;Maurits van Tulder;Maurits van Tulder;Mark P. Arts;Sidney M Rubinstein

  • Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain

    Daniëlle Awm van der Windt;Emmanuel Simons;Ingrid I Riphagen;Carlo Ammendolia

  • Interventions for impetigo.

    Sander Koning;Renske van der Sande;Arianne P. Verhagen;Lisette W. A. van Suijlekom-Smit

  • Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

    Leon Bax;Filip Staes;Arianne Verhagen

  • Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee

    Tijs Duivenvoorden;Reinoud W Brouwer;Tom M van Raaij;Arianne P Verhagen

  • Conservative treatments for whiplash

    Arianne P Verhagen;Gwendolijne Ggm Scholten‐Peeters;Sandra van Wijngaarden;Rob de Bie

  • The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews.

    Arianne P Verhagen;Arianne P Verhagen;Henrica C.W de Vet;Henrica C.W de Vet;Robert A de Bie;Maarten Boers

  • Spinal mechanical load as a risk factor for low back pain: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies

    Eric W. P. Bakker;Arianne P. Verhagen;Emiel van Trijffel;Cees Lucas

  • Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review

    Pim A. J. Luijsterburg;Arianne P. Verhagen;Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo;Ton A. G. van Os

  • A systematic review on the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for chronic non-specific low-back pain

    T. Kuijpers;M. van Middelkoop;S.M. Rubinstein;R.W.J.G. Ostelo

  • Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review.

    Jasper M. Schellingerhout;Arianne P Verhagen;Martijn W. Heymans;Bart W. Koes

  • Effect of Radiofrequency Denervation on Pain Intensity Among Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: The Mint Randomized Clinical Trials.

    Johan N.S. Juch;Esther T. Maas;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;J. George Groeneweg

  • Prognostic factors for poor recovery in acute whiplash patients.

    Erik J.M. Hendriks;Gwendolijne G.M. Scholten-Peeters;Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt;Catharina W.M. Neeleman-van der Steen

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra
Sita M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Jan Passchier
Jan Passchier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Peter Kuikman
Peter Kuikman Wageningen University & Research
Jan A.N. Verhaar
Jan A.N. Verhaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Maarten Boers
Maarten Boers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a future in medicine, exploring related online degrees and alternative career pathways can expand your opportunities in the healthcare sector. Advanced online programs allow working professionals and students to elevate their qualifications with flexibility and convenience.

For those interested in healthcare administration, cahme accredited online mha programs offer respected credentials that can lead to leadership roles in hospitals or health organizations. Nursing professionals looking to advance their careers may benefit from rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which are designed for maximum flexibility and often require minimal on-site commitments.

For nurses aiming for the highest clinical qualifications, the shortest dnp program online options accelerate the path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, while cheapest online dnp programs make advancing your education more affordable. These degree options can open doors to specialized roles and increased earning potential across the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Arianne P. Verhagen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles