World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14849 13975 1362 1300 279 40209

Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2010. 30 of the 330 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2010. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 12 publications
1994 2025

330 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 4
2001 1
2002 9
2003 5
2004 10
2005 11
2006 16
2007 15
2008 7
2009 9
2010 25
2011 12
2012 9
2013 10
2014 14
2015 10
2016 7
2017 19
2018 13
2019 11
2020 12
2021 18
2022 24
2023 22
2024 18
2025 12
Total 330
Download as CSV

Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 279 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 279
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt is affiliated with Keele University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on musculoskeletal pain, rehabilitation, and related clinical practices. The main field of study in which they have contributed is Medicine, with a substantial number of publications totalling over 200 works.

Their subfields of study include Surgery, Pharmacology, Rheumatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Economics and Econometrics. These reflect a broad engagement with clinical and systemic aspects of health and treatment methodologies.

Their research topics are diverse but center largely on issues related to musculoskeletal conditions and therapies. These topics include:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Shoulder injury and treatment
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation
  • Spondyloarthritis studies and treatments
  • Rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies

Among the venues where Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt has frequently published are:

  • Lara D. Veeken
  • BMJ Open
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • The Journal of Rheumatology
  • European Journal of Pain

Recent papers highlight contributions to systematic reviews and treatment recommendations within rheumatology and musculoskeletal pain fields. Selected recent publications include:

  • Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021, 2022, Nature Reviews Rheumatology
  • Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines, 2020, European Journal of Pain
  • A systematic review of the global prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain, 2022, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Moderators of the effect of therapeutic exercise for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, 2023, The Lancet Rheumatology
  • Stratified primary care versus non-stratified care for musculoskeletal pain: findings from the STarT MSK feasibility and pilot cluster randomized controlled trial, 2020, BMC Family Practice

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Nadia Corp
  • Christian Mallen
  • Nadine E. Foster
  • Jonathan Hill
  • Claire Burton

Best Publications

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Caroline B. Terwee;Sandra D.M. Bot;Michael R. de Boer;Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

  • Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors

    Jill A Hayden;Danielle A van der Windt;Jennifer L Cartwright;Pierre Côté

  • Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Karel G. M. Moons;Danielle A. van der Windt;Jill A. Hayden

  • Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines

    Walter L. J. M. Devillé;Frank Buntinx;Lex M Bouter;Victor M. Montori

  • Corticosteroid injections, physiotherapy, or a wait-and-see policy for lateral epicondylitis: a randomised controlled trial.

    Nynke Smidt;Daniëlle A W M van der Windt;Willem J J Assendelft;Walter L J M Devillé

  • Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review

    D. A. W. M. Van Der Windt;E. Thomas;D. P. Pope;A. F. De Winter

  • The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy

    Walter L J M Devillé;Joris C Yzermans;Nico P van Duijn;P Dick Bezemer

  • Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review.

    Nynke Smidt;Willem J.J. Assendelft;Daniëlle A.W.M van der Windt;Elaine M. Hay

  • Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review.

    Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt;Geert J.M.G. van der Heijden;Suzanne G.M. van den Berg;Gerben ter Riet

  • Prognosis research strategy (PROGRESS) 4: Stratified medicine research

    Aroon D Hingorani;Daniëlle A van der Windt;Richard D Riley;Keith Abrams

  • Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain - A randomized, controlled trial

    Jan Lucas Hoving;Bart W Koes;Henrica C W de Vet;Danielle A W M van der Windt

  • Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies.

    Gwendolijne G.M Scholten-Peeters;Arianne P Verhagen;Geertruida E Bekkering;Daniëlle A.W.M van der Windt

  • Acupuncture for peripheral joint osteoarthritis

    Eric Manheimer;Ke Cheng;Klaus Linde;Lixing Lao

  • Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain

    Daniëlle Awm van der Windt;Emmanuel Simons;Ingrid I Riphagen;Carlo Ammendolia

  • Exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis: systematic review incorporating trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis

    Olalekan A Uthman;Olalekan A Uthman;Danielle A van der Windt;Joanne L Jordan;Krysia S Dziedzic

  • Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders

    Ton Kuijpers;Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt;Geert J.M.G. van der Heijden;Lex M. Bouter

  • Effective treatment options for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: A systematic overview of current evidence.

    Opeyemi O. Babatunde;Joanne L. Jordan;Danielle A. Van der Windt;Jonathan C. Hill

  • Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis

    Nynke Smidt;Daniëlle A. van der Windt;Willem J. Assendelft;Anneke J. Mourits

  • Effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review

    N. Smidt;W.J.J. Assendelft;H. Arola;A. Malmivaara

Frequent Co-Authors

Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nadine E. Foster
Nadine E. Foster University of Queensland
Elaine M. Hay
Elaine M. Hay Keele University
Peter Croft
Peter Croft Keele University
Joost Dekker
Joost Dekker University of Amsterdam
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Arianne P. Verhagen
Arianne P. Verhagen University of Technology Sydney
Caroline B. Terwee
Caroline B. Terwee VU University Medical Center
Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Chris J. Main
Chris J. Main Keele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities beyond becoming a physician. Many students pursue administrative or specialized roles through online study, making education more accessible and affordable.

Those interested in leadership and management can consider a healthcare administration degree online for foundational skills in running healthcare organizations. For advanced positions, the cheapest mha programs offer a cost-effective way to earn a master's degree and advance rapidly in the field.

Clinical roles are also accessible online. The best dnp programs online allow nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice, preparing them for top clinical and leadership positions. For those interested in pharmaceuticals, an accredited pharmacy degree online can lead to rewarding careers in pharmacy, research, and patient care.

Exploring these online pathways provides flexibility, affordability, and a wide range of career options within healthcare, whether your aim is clinical practice, administration, or specialized healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles