World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Henrica C.W. de Vet

Henrica C.W. de Vet

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
131
Citations
115008
World Ranking
332
National Ranking
15

Medicine

D-Index
134
Citations
125266
World Ranking
2092
National Ranking
77

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Henrica C.W. de Vet is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable work in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

Their main topics of study cover a broad spectrum of medical and clinical areas including:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Henrica C.W. de Vet has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • "COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study", 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • "18F-FDG PET baseline radiomics features improve the prediction of treatment outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma", 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Proposed New Dynamic Prognostic Index for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: International Metabolic Prognostic Index", 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Automated Segmentation of Baseline Metabolic Total Tumor Burden in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Which Method Is Most Successful? A Study on Behalf of the PETRA Consortium", 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Responsiveness, the longitudinal aspect of validity", 2021, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Ronald Boellaard
  • Otto S. Hoekstra
  • Josée M. Zijlstra
  • Jakoba J. Eertink
  • Gerben J.C. Zwezerijnen

Henrica C.W. de Vet commonly publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Blood
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

    P M Bossuyt;J B Reitsma;D E Bruns;C A Gatsonis

  • Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires

    Caroline B. Terwee;Sandra D.M. Bot;Michael R. de Boer;Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt

  • STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

    Patrick M Bossuyt;Johannes B Reitsma;David E Bruns;Constantine A Gatsonis

  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

    Patrick M Bossuyt;Johannes B Reitsma;David E Bruns;Constantine A Gatsonis

  • The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration

    Patrick M. Bossuyt;Johannes B. Reitsma;David E. Bruns;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.

    Lidwine B. Mokkink;Caroline B. Terwee;Donald L. Patrick;Jordi Alonso

  • The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study

    Lidwine B. Mokkink;Caroline B. Terwee;Donald L. Patrick;Jordi Alonso

  • STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

    Patrick M. Bossuyt;Johannes B. Reitsma;David E. Bruns;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

    C. A.C. Prinsen;L. B. Mokkink;L. M. Bouter;J. Alonso

  • Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change.

    Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo;Rick A. Deyo;P Stratford;Gordon Waddell

  • Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist

    Caroline B. Terwee;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Dirk L. Knol;Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo

  • When to use agreement versus reliability measures

    Henrica C.W. de Vet;Caroline B. Terwee;Dirk L. Knol;Lex M. Bouter

  • COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

    L. B. Mokkink;H. C. W. de Vet;C. A. C. Prinsen;D. L. Patrick

  • STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

    Jérémie F Cohen;Jérémie F Cohen;Daniël A Korevaar;Douglas G Altman;David E Bruns

  • The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content

    Lidwine B Mokkink;Caroline B Terwee;Dirk L Knol;Paul W Stratford

  • COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study

    C. B. Terwee;C. A.C. Prinsen;A. Chiarotto;M. J. Westerman

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy

    Marius A. Kemler;Gerard A.M. Barendse;Maarten van Kleef;Henrica C.W. de Vet

  • Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines

    Walter L. J. M. Devillé;Frank Buntinx;Lex M Bouter;Victor M. Montori

  • Clinically important outcomes in low back pain.

    Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Henrica C.W. de Vet

  • STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. Translation to Russian

    Jérémie F. Cohen;F Cohen Jérémie;Daniël A. Korevaar;A Korevaar Daniël

Frequent Co-Authors

Lex M. Bouter
Lex M. Bouter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Caroline B. Terwee
Caroline B. Terwee VU University Medical Center
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Willem van Mechelen
Willem van Mechelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bart W. Koes
Bart W. Koes Erasmus University Rotterdam
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt University of Amsterdam
Les Irwig
Les Irwig University of Sydney
Johannes B. Reitsma
Johannes B. Reitsma Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine often means considering complementary or alternative pathways beyond an MD degree. Online degrees in related health fields are increasingly popular for their flexibility and career advancement opportunities.

For those interested in the management side of healthcare, a healthcare administration degree online accredited can open doors to leadership roles without stepping away from your current job. These programs focus on administration, policy, and health systems management.

Registered nurses looking to advance their practice may benefit from dedicated rn to np programs. These bridge programs allow nurses to earn a master’s degree and qualify as nurse practitioners, with many options delivered online for working professionals.

Nutrition is another vital area in healthcare, and earning an online dietitian degree can lead to rewarding roles as a dietitian or nutritionist. These programs are ideal for students interested in food science and preventative medicine.

Aspiring healthcare leaders should consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs for a comprehensive education recognized for quality. Accreditation ensures the program meets high standards, often required for higher-level positions in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Henrica C.W. de Vet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles