World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
18916
World Ranking
6014
National Ranking
2705

Barbara J. Grosz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Grosz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 159 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Barbara J. Grosz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Grosz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IJCAI Award for Research Excellence for her pioneering research in Natural Language Processing and in theories and applications of Multiagent Collaboration.
  • 2014 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • 2008 - ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award For fundamental contributions to research in natural language processing and in multi-agent systems, for her leadership in the field of artificial intelligence, and for her role in the establishment and leadership of interdisciplinary institutions.
  • 2008 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For pioneering research in natural language communication between humans and computers and its application to human-computer interaction.
  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2003 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the study of human discourse.
  • 1999 - AAAI Distinguished Service Award For her contributions to the field of artificial intelligence through sustained service in a multitude of academic, professional society, and government leadership roles, at the local, national and international levels, through which she has had a major effect on the field and on those working in it.
  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Barbara J. Grosz is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence and its applications in healthcare and communication. The main fields of study include Medicine and Computer Science, while the subfields emphasize Artificial Intelligence, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research, General Health Professions, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work addresses diverse topics such as Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Law, AI, and Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Academic Integrity and Plagiarism, Ethics in Clinical Research, and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues.

Barbara J. Grosz has contributed to numerous papers, with recent publications including:

  • Protecting scientific integrity in an age of generative AI, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Parent Perspectives in Shared Decision-Making for Children With Medical Complexity, 2020, Academic Pediatrics
  • Societal implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, 2024, The Lancet
  • Information Shaping for Enhanced Goal Recognition of Partially-Informed Agents, 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Family-Centered Technology in Complex Care: Feasibility Study, 2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent collaborators include Mary L. Gray, Wolfgang Blau, Vinton G. Cerf, Juan Enriquez, and Joseph S. Francisco. This network of coauthors reflects recurring interdisciplinary interactions across the fields related to Grosz's research interests.

Notable venues where Barbara J. Grosz has published regularly include:

  • The Lancet
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Academic Pediatrics
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Daedalus

The scientist has received multiple recognitions over the years, such as the IJCAI Award for Research Excellence in 2015 for pioneering research in Natural Language Processing and Multiagent Collaboration. They are a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (2014), a Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2008) for work in natural language communication between humans and computers, and a recipient of the ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award (2008) recognizing contributions to AI research and interdisciplinary leadership.

Additional distinctions include Fellowships with the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2004), ACM (2003) for contributions to human discourse studies, and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (1990). Early awards include the AAAI Distinguished Service Award in 1999 and Fellowship in the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990).

Best Publications

  • Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse

    Barbara J. Grosz;Candace L. Sidner

  • Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse

    Barbara J. Grosz;Scott Weinstein;Aravind K. Joshi

  • Collaborative plans for complex group action

    Barbara J. Grosz;Sarit Kraus

  • Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse

    Peter C. Gordon;Barbara J. Grosz;Laura A. Gilliom

  • Plans for Discourse

    Barbara J Grosz;Candace L Sidner

  • PROVIDING A UNIFIED ACCOUNT OF DEFINITE NOUN PHRASES IN DISCOURSE

    Barbara J. Grosz;Aravind K. Joshi;Scott Weinstein

  • The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding.

    Barbara Jean Grosz

  • TEAM: an experiment in the design of transportable natural-language interfaces

    Barbara J. Grosz;Douglas E. Appelt;Paul A. Martin;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • Some Intonational Characteristics of Discourse Structure

    Barbara J. Grosz;Julia Hirschberg

  • TEAM: A TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL-LANGUAGE INTERFACE SYSTEM

    Barbara J. Grosz

  • The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs

    Barbara J. Grosz

  • Readings in natural language processing

    Barbara J. Grosz;Karen Sparck-Jones;Bonnie Lynn Webber

  • The Evolution of Sharedplans

    Barbara J. Grosz;Sarit Kraus

  • DIALOGIC: a core natural-language processing system

    Barbara Grosz;Norman Haas;Gary Hendrix;Jerry Hobbs

  • Focusing and Description in Natural Language Dialogues

    Barbara J. Grosz

  • Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education

    Barbara J. Grosz;David Gray Grant;Kate Vredenburgh;Jeff Behrends

  • A combinatorial auction for collaborative planning

    L. Hunsberger;B.J. Grosz

  • Research on natural-language processing: SRI International

    Barbara Grosz

  • Collaborative plans for group activities

    Barbara Grosz;Sarit Kraus

  • Collaborative Systems (AAAI-94 Presidential Address)

    Barbara J. Grosz

  • Natural Language Processing

    Fernando C. N. Pereira;Barbara J. Grosz

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Stuart M. Shieber
Stuart M. Shieber Harvard University
Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Krzysztof Z. Gajos Harvard University
Candace L. Sidner
Candace L. Sidner Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Ece Kamar
Ece Kamar Microsoft (United States)
Avi Pfeffer
Avi Pfeffer Charles River Laboratories (Netherlands)
Julia Hirschberg
Julia Hirschberg Columbia University
Aravind K. Joshi
Aravind K. Joshi University of Pennsylvania
Milind Tambe
Milind Tambe Harvard University
Peter Stone
Peter Stone The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science education offers many flexible options beyond traditional campus programs. With the growing demand for tech professionals, exploring graduate degrees that are worth it can help advance your career, open doors to specialized roles, and increase earning potential.

Not everyone follows the same educational path. If you’re starting out or balancing work and study, online associate degree programs in computer science can give you a cost-effective head start. These flexible programs deliver foundational skills to help you qualify for entry-level tech jobs or transfer into four-year universities later.

Affordability is also key. Students searching for quality education on a budget can explore cheap online college classes. These options help reduce student debt while delivering the core knowledge needed for a successful computing career.

Lastly, don’t let your academic history limit your ambitions. Plenty of online colleges that accept low gpa offer a pathway to a fresh start and new career opportunities in technology, welcoming students with diverse backgrounds and experiences.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara J. Grosz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles