World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
12059
World Ranking
4549
National Ranking
275

Massimo Poesio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Poesio sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 278 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Massimo Poesio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Poesio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Massimo Poesio is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions to the subfields of artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience. Additional interests include computer vision and pattern recognition, computer science applications, and computer networks and communications.

Their work extensively covers topics related to natural language processing techniques and topic modeling. Other notable research areas include speech and dialogue systems, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, text readability and simplification, mobile crowdsensing and crowdsourcing, as well as memory and neural mechanisms.

Massimo Poesio has collaborated with several frequent coauthors, including Silviu Paun, Juntao Yu, Ron Artstein, Alexandra Uma, and Tommaso Fornaciari.

Their publications appear across various venues, with a significant presence on arXiv (Cornell University). Other venues featuring their research include Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, and Computational Linguistics.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Learning from Disagreement: A Survey" (2021), Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • "A Case for Soft Loss Functions" (2020), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing
  • "Named Entity Recognition as Dependency Parsing" (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Fake opinion detection: how similar are crowdsourced datasets to real data?" (2020), Language Resources and Evaluation
  • "Scaling and Disagreements: Bias, Noise, and Ambiguity" (2022), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

In addition to articles, Massimo Poesio has authored a book titled Statistical Methods for Annotation Analysis published by Morgan & Claypool Publishers in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics

    Ron Artstein;Ron Artstein;Massimo Poesio;Massimo Poesio

  • Named Entity Recognition as Dependency Parsing.

    Juntao Yu;Bernd Bohnet;Massimo Poesio

  • A corpus-based investigation of definite description use

    Massimo Poesio;Renata Vieira

  • BART: A modular toolkit for coreference resolution

    Yannick Versley;Simone Paolo Ponzetto;Massimo Poesio;Vladimir Eidelman

  • The TRAINS Project: A Case Study in Defining a Conversational Planning Agent

    James F. Allen;Lenhart K. Schubert;George Ferguson;Peter Heeman

  • An empirically based system for processing definite descriptions

    Renata Vieira;Massimo Poesio

  • Centering: A Parametric Theory and Its Instantiations

    Massimo Poesio;Rosemary Stevenson;Barbara Di Eugenio;Janet Hitzeman

  • Conversational Actions and Discourse Situations

    Massimo Poesio;David R. Traum

  • Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization

    Josef Steinberger;Massimo Poesio;Mijail A. Kabadjov;Karel Jeek

  • Strudel: A corpus-based semantic model based on properties and types

    Marco Baroni;Brian Murphy;Eduard Barbu;Massimo Poesio

  • Anaphoric Annotation in the ARRAU Corpus

    Massimo Poesio;Ron Artstein

  • SemEval-2010 Task 1: Coreference Resolution in Multiple Languages

    Marta Recasens;Llu'is Màrquez;Emili Sapena;M. Antònia Mart'i

  • Modelling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules

    Colin Matheson;Massimo Poesio;David Traum

  • The MATE/GNOME Proposals for Anaphoric Annotation, Revisited

    Massimo Poesio

  • Learning to Resolve Bridging References

    Massimo Poesio;Rahul Mehta;Axel Maroudas;Janet Hitzeman

  • Attribute-Based and Value-Based Clustering: An Evaluation.

    Abdulrahman Almuhareb;Massimo Poesio

  • Phrase Detectives: A Web-based collaborative annotation game

    Jon Chamberlain;Massimo Poesio;Udo Kruschwitz

  • Phrase detectives: Utilizing collective intelligence for internet-scale language resource creation

    Massimo Poesio;Jon Chamberlain;Udo Kruschwitz;Livio Robaldo

  • Resolving bridging references in unrestricted text

    Massimo Poesio;Renata Vieira;Simone Teufel

  • Semantic Ambiguity and Perceived Ambiguity

    Massimo Poesio

  • Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-04)

    Nikiforos Karamanis;Massimo Poesio;Chris Mellish;Jon Oberlander

Frequent Co-Authors

Asif Ekbal
Asif Ekbal Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Marco Baroni
Marco Baroni Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
Simone Paolo Ponzetto
Simone Paolo Ponzetto University of Mannheim
David Traum
David Traum University of Southern California
Chris Mellish
Chris Mellish University of Aberdeen
Alessandro Moschitti
Alessandro Moschitti Amazon (United States)
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
Giuseppe Riccardi
Giuseppe Riccardi University of Trento
Michael Strube
Michael Strube Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open the door to a wide range of related online degrees and dynamic career opportunities. Many students consider combining technical know-how with business skills. One popular route is enrolling in an mba online cheap, which helps you gain essential management expertise without a huge financial burden.

For those who want to fast-track their education, one year masters programs online are increasingly popular. These programs allow you to quickly upgrade your qualifications and strengthen your resume.

If you’re looking to launch your career sooner, consider short degrees that pay well. Many of these certificates or associate programs deliver strong earning potential with less time invested.

The future of tech is also incredibly promising, especially for those interested in artificial intelligence. You can prepare for cutting-edge roles by pursuing an ai degree online, designed to be both flexible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Massimo Poesio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles