World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9778 9174 948 904 390 29731

Ruth J. Muschel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth J. Muschel between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth J. Muschel published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 107 publications in 2023. 5 of the 468 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 107. Peak 107 publications in 2023. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 9 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 107 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1977 2025

468 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth J. Muschel: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 3
1984 0
1985 3
1986 4
1987 2
1988 5
1989 1
1990 4
1991 5
1992 5
1993 1
1994 9
1995 10
1996 10
1997 4
1998 15
1999 4
2000 6
2001 8
2002 13
2003 18
2004 12
2005 7
2006 4
2007 3
2008 5
2009 7
2010 5
2011 13
2012 27
2013 19
2014 14
2015 20
2016 19
2017 12
2018 17
2019 10
2020 15
2021 7
2022 5
2023 107
2024 4
2025 1
Total 468
Download as CSV

Ruth J. Muschel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth J. Muschel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 390 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 390
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ruth J. Muschel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth J. Muschel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ruth J. Muschel is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, with a focus on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broad areas, their work predominantly covers oncology, molecular biology, and immunology, alongside contributions to pulmonary and respiratory medicine and cancer research.

Their research topics often include cancer, hypoxia, and metabolism; cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers; immunotherapy and immune responses; prostate cancer treatment and research; mathematical biology related to tumor growth; effects of radiation exposure; and immune cells in cancer.

Muschel has co-authored multiple publications with a range of colleagues. Frequent co-authors include Boštjan Markelc, Jakob Kaeppler, Jianzhou Chen, Helen M. Byrne, and Bernadette J. Stolz.

Publications appear regularly in respected venues, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), British Journal of Cancer, Cancer Research, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Cancer & Metabolism.

Some of the recent papers associated with their name include:

  • Liver metastases, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Irradiation at Ultra-High (FLASH) Dose Rates Reduces Acute Normal Tissue Toxicity in the Mouse Gastrointestinal System, 2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • FGF2 alters macrophage polarization, tumour immunity and growth and can be targeted during radiotherapy, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Platelets and Metastasis: New Implications of an Old Interplay, 2020, Frontiers in Oncology
  • Impacts of combining anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy and radiotherapy on the tumour immune microenvironment in a murine prostate cancer model, 2020, British Journal of Cancer

Best Publications

  • KILLER/DR5 is a DNA damage–inducible p53–regulated death receptor gene

    G. S. Wu;T. F. Burns;E. R. McDonald;W. Jiang

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Cancer cells that survive radiation therapy acquire HIF-1 activity and translocate toward tumour blood vessels

    Hiroshi Harada;Masahiro Inoue;Satoshi Itasaka;Kiichi Hirota

  • Intravascular origin of metastasis from the proliferation of endothelium-attached tumor cells: a new model for metastasis.

    A B Al-Mehdi;K Tozawa;A B Fisher;L Shientag

  • A Distinct Macrophage Population Mediates Metastatic Breast Cancer Cell Extravasation, Establishment and Growth

    Binzhi Qian;Yan Deng;Jae Hong Im;Ruth J. Muschel

  • Cancer stem cells from colorectal cancer-derived cell lines

    Trevor M. Yeung;Shaan C. Gandhi;Jennifer L. Wilding;Ruth Muschel

  • miR-182-Mediated Downregulation of BRCA1 Impacts DNA Repair and Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors

    Patryk Moskwa;Francesca M. Buffa;Yunfeng Pan;Rohit Panchakshari

  • Direct evidence linking expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (92-kDa gelatinase/collagenase) to the metastatic phenotype in transformed rat embryo cells.

    Eric J. Bernhard;Stephen B. Gruber;Ruth J. Muschel

  • Targeting the CCL2-CCR2 signaling axis in cancer metastasis.

    Su Yin Lim;Arseniy E. Yuzhalin;Alex N. Gordon-Weeks;Ruth J. Muschel

  • Local recurrence in head and neck cancer: relationship to radiation resistance and signal transduction.

    Anjali K Gupta;W Gillies McKenna;Charles N Weber;Michael D Feldman

  • Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation

    E Fokas;R Prevo;J R Pollard;P M Reaper

  • On the dual roles and polarized phenotypes of neutrophils in tumor development and progression.

    H Piccard;R J Muschel;Ghislain Opdenakker

  • The molecular basis for cell cycle delays following ionizing radiation: a review.

    A Maity;W G McKenna;R J Muschel

  • Recruitment of monocytes/macrophages by tissue factor-mediated coagulation is essential for metastatic cell survival and premetastatic niche establishment in mice

    Ana M. Gil-Bernabé;Špela Ferjančič;Monika Tlalka;Lei Zhao

  • The Vascular Basement Membrane as “Soil” in Brain Metastasis

    W. Shawn Carbonell;Olaf Ansorge;Nicola Sibson;Ruth Muschel

  • Coagulation facilitates tumor cell spreading in the pulmonary vasculature during early metastatic colony formation.

    Jae Hong Im;Weili Fu;Hui Wang;Sujata K. Bhatia

  • Apoptosis: an early event in metastatic inefficiency.

    Christopher W. Wong;Andrea Lee;Lisa Shientag;Jong Yu

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells Prevent the Rejection of Fully Allogenic Islet Grafts by the Immunosuppressive Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -9

    Yunchuan Ding;Danmei Xu;Gang Feng;Andrew Bushell

  • The Ras Radiation Resistance Pathway

    Anjali K. Gupta;Vincent J. Bakanauskas;George J. Cerniglia;Yi Cheng

  • Proteases, extracellular matrix, and cancer: a workshop of the path B study section.

    Yves A. DeClerck;Arthur M. Mercurio;M. Sharon Stack;Harold A. Chapman

  • BRCA1 Effects on the Cell Cycle and the DNA Damage Response Are Linked to Altered Gene Expression

    Timothy K. MacLachlan;Kumaravel Somasundaram;Magda Sgagias;Yelena Shifman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Brunner
Thomas Brunner University of Konstanz
Stephen M. Hahn
Stephen M. Hahn The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Nicola R. Sibson
Nicola R. Sibson University of Oxford
Ester M. Hammond
Ester M. Hammond University of Oxford
adrian l harris
adrian l harris University of Oxford
Rosemarie Mick
Rosemarie Mick University of Pennsylvania
Jeffrey W. Pollard
Jeffrey W. Pollard University of Edinburgh
Andrew D. Hamilton
Andrew D. Hamilton New York University
Wafik S. El-Deiry
Wafik S. El-Deiry Brown University
Daniel C. Anthony
Daniel C. Anthony University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering alternative or complementary careers to Medicine in the USA, a range of affordable online degrees and certifications are available. These programs can help you enter the healthcare field quickly and flexibly.

One option is earning a degree through pharmacy school online accredited programs, which can lead to a dynamic role in pharmaceutical care. For those interested in the management and organization of patient data, specialized rhia certification programs online offer a pathway into health information management.

If administrative roles interest you, consider the medical billing and coding certification cost and how it compares between different accredited online programs. Meanwhile, aspiring advanced practice nurses can pursue high-demand roles through cheapest online np programs.

These online education pathways provide flexibility, affordability, and the potential for strong job growth in the expanding healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth J. Muschel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles