World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
26006
World Ranking
16562
National Ranking
8321

Stephen M. Hahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 396 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen M. Hahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen M. Hahn is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Radiation, and Oncology.

The topics most frequently addressed in their work cover Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy, Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare.

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by Stephen M. Hahn include:

  • Global Radiotherapy: Current Status and Future Directions-White Paper, 2021, JCO Global Oncology
  • Unwavering Regulatory Safeguards for COVID-19 Vaccines, 2020, JAMA
  • Circulating Tumor Cells Are Associated with Recurrent Disease in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases: High rates of local control with favorable toxicity, 2020, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • NTCP Models for Severe Radiation Induced Dermatitis After IMRT or Proton Therapy for Thoracic Cancer Patients, 2020, Frontiers in Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen M. Hahn include Charles B. Simone, Zhongxing Liao, Mary Gospodarowicz, Peter Marks, and Abigail T. Berman.

The publication venues where their research appears most often are JAMA, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, JCO Global Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, and Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Best Publications

  • Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update†‡

    Patrizia Agostinis;Kristian Berg;Keith A. Cengel;Thomas H. Foster

  • Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer

    Christina Twyman-Saint Victor;Andrew J. Rech;Amit Maity;Ramesh Rengan;Ramesh Rengan

  • Improving immune-vascular crosstalk for cancer immunotherapy

    Yuhui Huang;Betty Y.S. Kim;Charles K. Chan;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Hypoxia is important in the biology and aggression of human glial brain tumors.

    Sydney M. Evans;Kevin D. Judy;Isolde Dunphy;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ September 22–24, 2009

    Carmen J. Allegra;Denise R. Aberle;Pamela Ganschow;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Trial of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Zhongxing Liao;J. Jack Lee;Ritsuko Komaki;Daniel R. Gomez

  • Determination of the distribution of light, optical properties, drug concentration, and tissue oxygenation in-vivo in human prostate during motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy.

    Timothy C. Zhu;Jarod C. Finlay;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Suppression of Type I IFN Signaling in Tumors Mediates Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Treatment That Can Be Overcome by Radiotherapy.

    Xiaohong Wang;Jonathan E. Schoenhals;Ailin Li;David R. Valdecanas

  • A Phase I Study of Topical Tempol for the Prevention of Alopecia Induced by Whole Brain Radiotherapy

    James M. Metz;Debbie Smith;Rosemarie Mick;Robert Lustig

  • Detection of Hypoxia in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma by EF5 Binding

    Sydney M. Evans;Stephen Hahn;Deirdre R. Pook;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • Comparative measurements of hypoxia in human brain tumors using needle electrodes and EF5 binding.

    Sydney M. Evans;Kevin D. Judy;Isolde Dunphy;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • Short-term and long-term health risks of nuclear-power-plant accidents

    John P. Christodouleas;Robert D. Forrest;Christopher G. Ainsley;Zelig Tochner

  • Factors Affecting the Risk of Brain Metastases After Definitive Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

    Theodore J. Robnett;Mitchell Machtay;James P. Stevenson;Kenneth M. Algazy

  • In vivo electron paramagnetic resonance imaging of tumor heterogeneity and oxygenation in a murine model.

    Periannan Kuppusamy;Mobae Afeworki;Ravi A. Shankar;Deborah Coffin

  • Nitroxide stable radicals protect beating cardiomyocytes against oxidative damage.

    Amram Samuni;Dorit Winkelsberg;Ariè Pinson;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

    Quynh-Nhu Nguyen;Stephen G. Chun;Edward Chow;Ritsuko Komaki

  • Detection of Brain Tumor Cells in the Peripheral Blood by a Telomerase Promoter-Based Assay

    Kelly M. MacArthur;Gary D. Kao;Sanjay Chandrasekaran;Michelle Alonso-Basanta

  • Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors An Overview of the Results of Preclinical and Clinical Investigations

    Thomas B. Brunner;Stephen M. Hahn;Anjali K. Gupta;Ruth J. Muschel

  • The RAS signal transduction pathway and its role in radiation sensitivity

    W Gillies McKenna;Ruth J Muschel;Anjali K Gupta;Stephen M Hahn

  • Nelfinavir Down-regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α and VEGF Expression and Increases Tumor Oxygenation: Implications for Radiotherapy

    Nabendu Pore;Anjali K. Gupta;George J. Cerniglia;Zibin Jiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Eli Glatstein
Eli Glatstein University of Pennsylvania
Rosemarie Mick
Rosemarie Mick University of Pennsylvania
Arjun G. Yodh
Arjun G. Yodh University of Pennsylvania
Cameron J. Koch
Cameron J. Koch University of Pennsylvania
Douglas L. Fraker
Douglas L. Fraker University of Pennsylvania
James B. Mitchell
James B. Mitchell National Institutes of Health
William DeGraff
William DeGraff National Institutes of Health
Ruth J. Muschel
Ruth J. Muschel University of Oxford
Corey J. Langer
Corey J. Langer University of Pennsylvania
Andy J. Minn
Andy J. Minn University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If studying Medicine in the USA feels overwhelming or out of reach, there are other rewarding pathways in healthcare to consider. For many, nursing is a popular option. You may want to explore whats the easiest nursing program to get into?, especially if you are looking for a flexible entry point. Some schools offer greater accessibility, such as nursing school that does not require teas test, removing additional barriers in the admissions process.

Alternatively, you can pursue fast-growing fields that require less time to get started, like medical billing and coding. These programs are available online, and you can find valuable support by searching for financial aid for medical billing and coding programs.

If you're interested in leadership or administration, consider enrolling in a healthcare administration accelerated degree online. These career pathways offer diverse opportunities within the healthcare industry, often with flexible learning options suited for busy students or working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Hahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles