World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16561 15578 8320 7698 396 26006

Stephen M. Hahn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen M. Hahn between 1990 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen M. Hahn published across 34 years, from 1990 to 2023, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2023. 48 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2023. 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 48 publications
1990 2023

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen M. Hahn: publications per year, 1990 to 2023
Year Publications
1990 5
1991 4
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 3
1999 5
2000 5
2001 16
2002 9
2003 17
2004 19
2005 14
2006 22
2007 12
2008 10
2009 15
2010 12
2011 16
2012 14
2013 16
2014 25
2015 26
2016 21
2017 45
2018 20
2019 23
2020 11
2021 1
2022 0
2023 48
Total 444
Download as CSV

Stephen M. Hahn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 396 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 396
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen M. Hahn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Hahn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen M. Hahn is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Radiation, and Oncology.

The topics most frequently addressed in their work cover Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy, Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare.

Recent scholarly papers authored or co-authored by Stephen M. Hahn include:

  • Global Radiotherapy: Current Status and Future Directions-White Paper, 2021, JCO Global Oncology
  • Unwavering Regulatory Safeguards for COVID-19 Vaccines, 2020, JAMA
  • Circulating Tumor Cells Are Associated with Recurrent Disease in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy, 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases: High rates of local control with favorable toxicity, 2020, Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • NTCP Models for Severe Radiation Induced Dermatitis After IMRT or Proton Therapy for Thoracic Cancer Patients, 2020, Frontiers in Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen M. Hahn include Charles B. Simone, Zhongxing Liao, Mary Gospodarowicz, Peter Marks, and Abigail T. Berman.

The publication venues where their research appears most often are JAMA, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, JCO Global Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, and Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Best Publications

  • Photodynamic therapy of cancer: An update†‡

    Patrizia Agostinis;Kristian Berg;Keith A. Cengel;Thomas H. Foster

  • Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer

    Christina Twyman-Saint Victor;Andrew J. Rech;Amit Maity;Ramesh Rengan;Ramesh Rengan

  • Improving immune-vascular crosstalk for cancer immunotherapy

    Yuhui Huang;Betty Y.S. Kim;Charles K. Chan;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Hypoxia is important in the biology and aggression of human glial brain tumors.

    Sydney M. Evans;Kevin D. Judy;Isolde Dunphy;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ September 22–24, 2009

    Carmen J. Allegra;Denise R. Aberle;Pamela Ganschow;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Trial of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Zhongxing Liao;J. Jack Lee;Ritsuko Komaki;Daniel R. Gomez

  • Determination of the distribution of light, optical properties, drug concentration, and tissue oxygenation in-vivo in human prostate during motexafin lutetium-mediated photodynamic therapy.

    Timothy C. Zhu;Jarod C. Finlay;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Suppression of Type I IFN Signaling in Tumors Mediates Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Treatment That Can Be Overcome by Radiotherapy.

    Xiaohong Wang;Jonathan E. Schoenhals;Ailin Li;David R. Valdecanas

  • A Phase I Study of Topical Tempol for the Prevention of Alopecia Induced by Whole Brain Radiotherapy

    James M. Metz;Debbie Smith;Rosemarie Mick;Robert Lustig

  • Detection of Hypoxia in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma by EF5 Binding

    Sydney M. Evans;Stephen Hahn;Deirdre R. Pook;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • Comparative measurements of hypoxia in human brain tumors using needle electrodes and EF5 binding.

    Sydney M. Evans;Kevin D. Judy;Isolde Dunphy;W. Timothy Jenkins

  • Short-term and long-term health risks of nuclear-power-plant accidents

    John P. Christodouleas;Robert D. Forrest;Christopher G. Ainsley;Zelig Tochner

  • Factors Affecting the Risk of Brain Metastases After Definitive Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

    Theodore J. Robnett;Mitchell Machtay;James P. Stevenson;Kenneth M. Algazy

  • In vivo electron paramagnetic resonance imaging of tumor heterogeneity and oxygenation in a murine model.

    Periannan Kuppusamy;Mobae Afeworki;Ravi A. Shankar;Deborah Coffin

  • Nitroxide stable radicals protect beating cardiomyocytes against oxidative damage.

    Amram Samuni;Dorit Winkelsberg;Ariè Pinson;Stephen M. Hahn

  • Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

    Quynh-Nhu Nguyen;Stephen G. Chun;Edward Chow;Ritsuko Komaki

  • Detection of Brain Tumor Cells in the Peripheral Blood by a Telomerase Promoter-Based Assay

    Kelly M. MacArthur;Gary D. Kao;Sanjay Chandrasekaran;Michelle Alonso-Basanta

  • Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors An Overview of the Results of Preclinical and Clinical Investigations

    Thomas B. Brunner;Stephen M. Hahn;Anjali K. Gupta;Ruth J. Muschel

  • The RAS signal transduction pathway and its role in radiation sensitivity

    W Gillies McKenna;Ruth J Muschel;Anjali K Gupta;Stephen M Hahn

  • Nelfinavir Down-regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α and VEGF Expression and Increases Tumor Oxygenation: Implications for Radiotherapy

    Nabendu Pore;Anjali K. Gupta;George J. Cerniglia;Zibin Jiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Eli Glatstein
Eli Glatstein University of Pennsylvania
Rosemarie Mick
Rosemarie Mick University of Pennsylvania
Arjun G. Yodh
Arjun G. Yodh University of Pennsylvania
Cameron J. Koch
Cameron J. Koch University of Pennsylvania
Douglas L. Fraker
Douglas L. Fraker University of Pennsylvania
James B. Mitchell
James B. Mitchell National Institutes of Health
William DeGraff
William DeGraff National Institutes of Health
Ruth J. Muschel
Ruth J. Muschel University of Oxford
Corey J. Langer
Corey J. Langer University of Pennsylvania
Andy J. Minn
Andy J. Minn University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If studying Medicine in the USA feels overwhelming or out of reach, there are other rewarding pathways in healthcare to consider. For many, nursing is a popular option. You may want to explore whats the easiest nursing program to get into?, especially if you are looking for a flexible entry point. Some schools offer greater accessibility, such as nursing school that does not require teas test, removing additional barriers in the admissions process.

Alternatively, you can pursue fast-growing fields that require less time to get started, like medical billing and coding. These programs are available online, and you can find valuable support by searching for financial aid for medical billing and coding programs.

If you're interested in leadership or administration, consider enrolling in a healthcare administration accelerated degree online. These career pathways offer diverse opportunities within the healthcare industry, often with flexible learning options suited for busy students or working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Hahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles