World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1877 1694 1105 974 192 21939

Linda M. Chatters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda M. Chatters between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda M. Chatters published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 16 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 7 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1982 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda M. Chatters: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 3
1987 1
1988 4
1989 3
1990 2
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 4
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 6
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 1
2003 6
2004 1
2005 7
2006 1
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 6
2011 10
2012 8
2013 12
2014 4
2015 6
2016 10
2017 13
2018 15
2019 8
2020 10
2021 9
2022 6
2023 2
2024 9
2025 7
Total 209
Download as CSV

Linda M. Chatters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Chatters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 192
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda M. Chatters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Chatters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda M. Chatters is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States. Their research primarily spans across the social sciences, health professions, and psychology, with a focus on multiple subfields including sociology and political science, health, general health professions, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their scholarly work addresses key topics such as health disparities and outcomes, racial and ethnic identity research, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, religion, spirituality, and psychology, family dynamics and relationships, mental health treatment and access, as well as employment and welfare studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Linda M. Chatters include:

  • Robert Joseph Taylor
  • Harry Owen Taylor
  • Ann W. Nguyen
  • Amy J. Schulz
  • Christina J. Cross

Notable venues where they have published multiple works include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • UNC Libraries
  • Health Education & Behavior
  • Journal of Family Issues
  • Journal of Marriage and the Family

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Linda M. Chatters include:

  • Older Black Americans During COVID-19: Race and Age Double Jeopardy, 2020, Health Education & Behavior
  • Moving Health Education and Behavior Upstream: Lessons From COVID-19 for Addressing Structural Drivers of Health Inequities, 2020, Health Education & Behavior
  • Fictive Kin Networks among African Americans, Black Caribbeans, and Non-Latino Whites, 2021, Journal of Family Issues
  • Social isolation from family and friends and mental health among African Americans and Black Caribbeans, 2020, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
  • Psychiatric Disorders Among Older Black Americans: Within- and Between-Group Differences, 2020, Innovation in Aging

The topics covered in these papers emphasize the intersections of race, age, mental health, family networks, and health inequities. The work frequently explores how structural factors and social environments affect health outcomes, especially within Black American populations.

Best Publications

  • Religion in the Lives of African Americans : Social, Psychological, and Health Perspectives

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters;Jeffrey S. Levin

  • Religion and Health: Public Health Research and Practice

    Linda M. Chatters

  • Sociodemographic and environmental correlates of racial socialization by Black parents.

    Michael C. Thornton;Linda M. Chatters;Robert Joseph Taylor;Walter R. Allen

  • Race and Gender Differences in Religiosity Among Older Adults: Findings From Four National Surveys

    Jeffrey S. Levin;Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters

  • CHURCH MEMBERS AS A SOURCE OF INFORMAL SOCIAL SUPPORT

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters

  • Mental Health Services in Faith Communities: The Role of Clergy in Black Churches

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Christopher G. Ellison;Linda M. Chatters;Jeffrey S. Levin

  • Religious effects on health status and life satisfaction among black Americans.

    Jeffrey S. Levin;Linda M. Chatters;Robert Joseph Taylor

  • Black and white differences in religious participation : A multisample comparison

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters;Rukmalie Jayakody;Jeffrey S. Levin

  • Social Isolation, Depression, and Psychological Distress Among Older Adults:

    Harry Owen Taylor;Robert Joseph Taylor;Ann W. Nguyen;Linda Chatters

  • Religion, Health, and Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults: Findings from Three National Surveys

    Jeffrey S. Levin;Linda M. Chatters

  • Fictive Kinship Relations in black extended families

    Linda M. Chatters;Robert Joseph Taylor;Rukmalie Jayakody

  • Religious Coping Among African Americans, Caribbean Blacks and Non-Hispanic Whites.

    Linda M. Chatters;Robert Joseph Taylor;James S. Jackson;Karen D. Lincoln

  • Subjective Religiosity among African Americans: A Synthesis of Findings from Five National Samples

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Jacqueline Mattis;Linda M. Chatters

  • Research on religion and mental health: An overview of empirical findings and theoretical issues

    Jeffrey S. Levin;Linda M. Chatters

  • Racial and Ethnic Differences in Extended Family, Friendship, Fictive Kin, and Congregational Informal Support Networks

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters;Amanda Toler Woodward;Edna Brown

  • Church-based Informal Support Among Elderly Blacks

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters

  • Emotional Support from Parents Early in Life, Aging, and Health

    Benjamin A. Shaw;Neal Krause;Linda M. Chatters;Cathleen M Connell

  • A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEASURE OF RELIGIOUS INVOLVEMENT FOR AFRICAN AMERICANS

    Jeffrey S. Levin;Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters

  • Antecedents and dimensions of religious involvement among older black adults.

    Linda M. Chatters;Jeffrey S. Levin;Robert Joseph Taylor

  • Patterns of Informal Support to Elderly Black Adults: Family, Friends, and Church Members

    Robert Joseph Taylor;Linda M. Chatters

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Joseph Taylor
Robert Joseph Taylor University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Karen D. Lincoln
Karen D. Lincoln University of Southern California
James S. Jackson
James S. Jackson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jeffrey S. Levin
Jeffrey S. Levin Baylor University
Joseph A. Himle
Joseph A. Himle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sean Joe
Sean Joe Washington University in St. Louis
Harold W. Neighbors
Harold W. Neighbors University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Neal Krause
Neal Krause University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David H. Chae
David H. Chae Tulane University
Brian E. Perron
Brian E. Perron University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse educational and career options. With the increasing demand for flexible study schedules, many students are considering online psychology programs. These degrees offer the same rigorous curriculum as on-campus options, while providing the convenience and accessibility for working professionals or those with family commitments.

Prospective students should carefully research their choices to ensure a program’s value and reputation. Reviewing rankings such as the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Hawaii can help highlight programs with strong outcomes. Similarly, region-specific resources such as the most valuable psychology degrees in Jacksonville and the most valuable psychology degrees in New Jersey provide insights into programs with high employability and strong alumni networks. Students considering major metropolitan areas should also look at the most valuable psychology degrees in New York for additional options.

In addition to traditional therapy roles, graduates can pursue careers in counseling, education, human resources, research, and organizational psychology—many of which can be started with an online degree. Careful research ensures you choose a pathway aligned with your aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Linda M. Chatters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles