World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6742 6282 3652 3319 152 7379

Cheryl L. Holt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cheryl L. Holt between 1998 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cheryl L. Holt published across 26 years, from 1998 to 2023, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 2 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication
1998 2023

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cheryl L. Holt: publications per year, 1998 to 2023
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 4
2002 0
2003 6
2004 3
2005 6
2006 5
2007 1
2008 7
2009 12
2010 6
2011 7
2012 15
2013 13
2014 14
2015 14
2016 7
2017 19
2018 16
2019 7
2020 3
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
Total 169
Download as CSV

Cheryl L. Holt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl L. Holt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 152
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cheryl L. Holt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cheryl L. Holt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cheryl L. Holt is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Social Sciences, and Health Professions, with a substantial focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Health, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics in public health and medicine. These include:

  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Community Health and Development
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Cheryl L. Holt has published numerous articles in journals frequently associated with health and cancer epidemiology. The most common publication venues include Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Journal of Cancer Education, Global Implementation Research and Applications, Health Education Research, and Journal of Community Health.

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Cheryl L. Holt include:

  • "Meaning in Life Predicts Decreased Depressive Symptoms and Increased Positive Affect over Time but Does not Buffer Stress Effects in a National Sample of African-Americans," 2020, Journal of Happiness Studies
  • "The big reveal: Family disclosure patterns of BRCA genetic test results among young Black women with invasive breast cancer," 2020, Journal of Genetic Counseling
  • "Risks and benefits of antioxidant dietary supplement use during cancer treatment: protocol for a scoping review," 2021, BMJ Open
  • "Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Acceptability and Campaign Message Preferences Among African American Parents: a Qualitative Study," 2021, Journal of Cancer Education
  • "Lung cancer screening decisional needs among African American smokers of lower socioeconomic status," 2020, Ethnicity and Health

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of colleagues whose expertise complements their work. Among the frequent co-authors are Nathaniel Woodard, Maisha Huq, Debarchana Ghosh, Randi M. Williams, and Jimmie L. Slade.

Best Publications

  • Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory.

    Cheryl L. Holt;Jon. B. Ellis

  • Culturally appropriate storytelling to improve blood pressure: a randomized trial

    Thomas K. Houston;Jeroan J. Allison;Marc Sussman;Wendy Horn

  • Cultural tailoring for mammography and fruit and vegetable intake among low-income African-American women in urban public health centers

    Matthew W. Kreuter;Celette Sugg-Skinner;Cheryl L. Holt;Eddie M. Clark

  • Development and validation of brief scales to measure collectivism, religiosity, racial pride, and time orientation in urban African American women.

    Susan N. Lukwago;Matthew W. Kreuter;Dawn C. Bucholtz;Cheryl L. Holt

  • Spiritual health locus of control and breast cancer beliefs among urban African American women.

    Cheryl L. Holt;Eddie M. Clark;Matthew W. Kreuter;Doris M. Rubio

  • Perceptions of the Religion-Health Connection Among African American Church Members

    Cheryl L. Holt;Stephanie M. McClure

  • Positive and Negative Religious Coping Styles as Prospective Predictors of Well-Being in African Americans.

    Crystal L. Park;Cheryl L. Holt;Daisy Le;Juliette Christie

  • Relationship between religious social support and general social support with health behaviors in a national sample of African Americans.

    Katrina Debnam;Cheryl L. Holt;Eddie M. Clark;David L. Roth

  • Understanding the effects of printed health education materials: which features lead to which outcomes?

    Fiona Bull;C.L. Holt;M.W. Kreuter;E.M. Clark

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • Religion and health in African Americans: the role of religious coping.

    Cheryl L. Holt;Eddie M. Clark;Katrina J. Debnam;David L. Roth

  • Sociocultural correlates of breast cancer knowledge and screening in urban African American women.

    Susan N. Lukwago;Matthew W. Kreuter;Cheryl L. Holt;Karen Steger-May

  • Spirituality, breast cancer beliefs and mammography utilization among urban African American women.

    Cheryl L. Holt;Susan N. Lukwago;Matthew W. Kreuter

  • Spiritual health locus of control and health behaviors in African Americans.

    Katrina J. Debnam;Cheryl L. Holt;Eddie M. Clark;David L. Roth

  • Responses to behaviorally vs culturally tailored cancer communication among African American women.

    Matthew W. Kreuter;Celette Sugg Skinner;Karen Steger-May;Cheryl L. Holt

  • Comparing homeless persons' care experiences in tailored versus nontailored primary care programs.

    Stefan G. Kertesz;Cheryl L. Holt;Jocelyn L. Steward;Richard N. Jones

  • Exploring religion-health mediators among African American parishioners.

    Cheryl L. Holt;Laura A. Lewellyn;Mary Jo Rathweg

  • How Do People Process Health Information? Applications in an Age of Individualized Communication

    Matthew W. Kreuter;Cheryl L. Holt

  • Role of religious social support in longitudinal relationships between religiosity and health-related outcomes in African Americans

    Cheryl L. Holt;David L. Roth;Jin Huang;Eddie M. Clark

  • A comparison of a spiritually based and non-spiritually based educational intervention for informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African-American men.

    Cheryl L Holt;Theresa A Wynn;Mark S Litaker;Penny Southward

  • Role of Religion in Cancer Coping Among African Americans: A Qualitative Examination

    Cheryl L. Holt;Lee Caplan;Emily Schulz;Victor Blake

Frequent Co-Authors

Eddie M. Clark
Eddie M. Clark Saint Louis University
Matthew W. Kreuter
Matthew W. Kreuter Washington University in St. Louis
David L. Roth
David L. Roth Johns Hopkins University
Isabel C. Scarinci
Isabel C. Scarinci University of Alabama at Birmingham
David E. Pollio
David E. Pollio National Institutes of Health
Celette Sugg Skinner
Celette Sugg Skinner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Richard N. Jones
Richard N. Jones Brown University
Crystal L. Park
Crystal L. Park University of Connecticut
David A. Chambers
David A. Chambers National Institutes of Health
Xiaoli Nan
Xiaoli Nan University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up multiple online pathways, especially in counseling and education. Many students are drawn to school counseling, a field that requires both specialized education and state-specific licensure. For example, students considering this route should familiarize themselves with the Kansas school counselor certification requirements and the Kentucky school counselor certification requirements to understand the differences in prerequisites and credentials.

Additionally, the Louisiana school counselor education requirements highlight the importance of graduate-level coursework and practicum experience. For those interested in other regions, learning about becoming a school counselor in Maine can provide further insight into the range of career options available with a psychology degree.

Whether you choose to specialize in school counseling, clinical psychology, or another related field, online degree programs offer flexibility for working adults and career changers. Exploring state requirements early will help you select the ideal program and set a clear path toward your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Cheryl L. Holt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles