World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9791 9163 5180 4730 81 5978

Robin S. Edelstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robin S. Edelstein between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robin S. Edelstein published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2005. 5 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2005. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robin S. Edelstein: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 8
2006 5
2007 0
2008 4
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 2
2013 4
2014 7
2015 7
2016 5
2017 5
2018 3
2019 4
2020 4
2021 5
2022 2
2023 1
2024 1
2025 4
Total 87
Download as CSV

Robin S. Edelstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin S. Edelstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robin S. Edelstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin S. Edelstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robin S. Edelstein is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and has made contributions primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields including social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and demography.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics with a notable emphasis on evolutionary psychology and human behavior, attachment and relationship dynamics, family dynamics and relationships, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, social and intergroup psychology, reproductive health and technologies, and sexual function and dysfunction studies.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Robin S. Edelstein include:

  • "Estimating the Associations between Big Five Personality Traits, Testosterone, and Cortisol," 2021, Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
  • "More than a game: Trait competitiveness predicts motivation in minimally competitive contexts," 2021, Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Division of Baby Care in Heterosexual and Lesbian Parents: Expectations Versus Reality," 2020, Journal of Marriage and the Family
  • "Changes in prenatal testosterone and sexual desire in expectant couples," 2020, Hormones and Behavior
  • "Cross-cultural differences in supportive responses to positive event disclosure," 2023, The Journal of Positive Psychology

Among the frequent co-authors in their body of work are Lester Sim, William J. Chopik, Esra Ascigil, Britney M. Wardecker, and Kristi Chin.

The scientist has published multiple articles in established venues such as the Journal of Marriage and the Family, Hormones and Behavior, Personal Relationships, Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, and Personality and Individual Differences. The two venues with the highest number of publications by Edelstein are the Journal of Marriage and the Family and Hormones and Behavior.

Best Publications

  • Why children tell: a model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse

    Tina B Goodman-Brown;Robin S Edelstein;Gail S Goodman;David P.H Jones

  • Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach

    Linda J. Levine;Robin S. Edelstein

  • A Prospective Study of Memory for Child Sexual Abuse New Findings Relevant to the Repressed-Memory Controversy

    Gail S. Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Jodi A. Quas;Robin S. Edelstein

  • From the cradle to the grave: age differences in attachment from early adulthood to old age.

    William J. Chopik;Robin S. Edelstein;R. Chris Fraley

  • Adult attachment style and parental responsiveness during a stressful event

    Robin S. Edelstein;Kristen Weede Alexander;Phillip R. Shaver;Jennifer M. Schaaf

  • Traumatic Impact Predicts Long-Term Memory for Documented Child Sexual Abuse

    Kristen Weede Alexander;Jodi A. Quas;Gail S. Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Simona Ghetti

  • Avoiding Interference: Adult Attachment and Emotional Processing Biases

    Robin S. Edelstein;Omri Gillath

  • The role of attachment and cognitive inhibition in children's memory and suggestibility for a stressful event.

    Kristen Weede Alexander;Kristen Weede Alexander;Gail S Goodman;Jennifer M Schaaf;Robin S Edelstein

  • Sociosexuality moderates the association between testosterone and relationship status in men and women.

    Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik;Emily L. Kean

  • Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

    Amy C. Moors;Terri D. Conley;Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik

  • Attachment and emotional memory: Investigating the source and extent of avoidant memory impairments.

    Robin S. Edelstein

  • Childhood sexual assault victims: long-term outcomes after testifying in criminal court.

    Jodi A Quas;Gail S Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Kristen W Alexander

  • Detecting lies in children and adults.

    Robin S. Edelstein;Tanya L. Luten;Paul Ekman;Gail S. Goodman

  • Avoidant Attachment: Exploration of an Oxymoron

    Robin S. Edelstein;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Individual Differences in Emotional Memory: Adult Attachment and Long-Term Memory for Child Sexual Abuse

    Robin S. Edelstein;Simona Ghetti;Jodi A. Quas;Gail S. Goodman

  • Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples.

    Robin S. Edelstein;Sari M. van Anders;William J. Chopik;Katherine L. Goldey

  • Prenatal hormones in first‐time expectant parents: Longitudinal changes and within‐couple correlations

    Robin S. Edelstein;Britney M. Wardecker;William J. Chopik;Amy C. Moors

  • Was That Cheating? Perceptions Vary by Sex, Attachment Anxiety, and Behavior

    Daniel J. Kruger;Maryanne L. Fisher;Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik

  • Children's and Adults' Memory for Emotional Pictures: Examining Age-Related Patterns Using the Developmental Affective Photo System.

    Ingrid M. Cordon;Annika M.D. Melinder;Gail S. Goodman;Robin S. Edelstein

  • Narcissism Predicts Heightened Cortisol Reactivity to a Psychosocial Stressor in Men

    Robin S. Edelstein;Ilona S. Yim;Jodi A. Quas

  • The physiology of women's power motive: Implicit power motivation is positively associated with estradiol levels in women

    Steven J. Stanton;Robin S. Edelstein

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Chopik
William J. Chopik Michigan State University
Gail S. Goodman
Gail S. Goodman University of California, Davis
Jodi A. Quas
Jodi A. Quas University of California, Irvine
Allison D. Redlich
Allison D. Redlich George Mason University
Simona Ghetti
Simona Ghetti University of California, Davis
Sari M. van Anders
Sari M. van Anders Queen's University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Julie B. Kaplow
Julie B. Kaplow Baylor College of Medicine
Paul Ekman
Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco
Terri D. Conley
Terri D. Conley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue these programs to build foundational knowledge and gain flexibility as they prepare for specialized roles, such as substance abuse counseling. Each city or state may have unique requirements and opportunities for aspiring professionals in this field.

For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Arlington should familiarize themselves with Texas licensing standards and local treatment centers. Similarly, students focused on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Atlanta will need to understand Georgia’s specific educational and internship requirements.

If you are considering substance abuse counselor requirements in Aurora, be sure to review Colorado’s credentialing process, which emphasizes supervised clinical experience. In Austin, the process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Austin also highlights the importance of state-approved coursework and practical training.

Online psychology degrees can provide foundational skills for these career paths, but local licensure and specialized credentials are essential. Always consult your state or city regulations to ensure you are meeting the necessary standards for your chosen profession.

Best Scientists Citing Robin S. Edelstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles