World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2299 2099 255 239 215 15002

Iain C. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iain C. Campbell between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iain C. Campbell published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 4 of the 262 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 1978: 3 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 9 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

262 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iain C. Campbell: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 3
1979 3
1980 5
1981 1
1982 9
1983 4
1984 2
1985 5
1986 3
1987 4
1988 4
1989 5
1990 6
1991 6
1992 3
1993 2
1994 3
1995 4
1996 6
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 2
2003 9
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 8
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 11
2012 9
2013 14
2014 6
2015 8
2016 14
2017 10
2018 5
2019 8
2020 12
2021 9
2022 8
2023 3
2024 8
2025 3
2026 1
Total 262
Download as CSV

Iain C. Campbell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain C. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 215 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 215
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Iain C. Campbell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain C. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Iain C. Campbell is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health as subfields of study.

The main topics of Campbell's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Campbell cover a range of subjects related to eating disorders and treatment interventions. These include:

  • Brain Structure in Acutely Underweight and Partially Weight-Restored Individuals With Anorexia Nervosa: A Coordinated Analysis by the ENIGMA Eating Disorders Working Group, 2022, Biological Psychiatry
  • Food related attention bias modification training for anorexia nervosa and its potential underpinning mechanisms, 2020, Journal of Eating Disorders
  • The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food choice-related self-control in patients with severe, enduring anorexia nervosa, 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • The outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for Obesity and Binge Eating Disorder: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, 2021, Appetite
  • Association of Genetic and Phenotypic Assessments With Onset of Disordered Eating Behaviors and Comorbid Mental Health Problems Among Adolescents, 2020, JAMA Network Open

Campbell frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Ulrike Schmidt, Lucy Gallop, Bethan Dalton, Savani Bartholdy, and Jessica McClelland.

Their research is published extensively in venues related to eating disorders and mental health. The most common publication venues include:

  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • European Eating Disorders Review
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • The prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial: factorial randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and antioxidants in patients with diabetes and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease

    Jill Belch;Angus MacCuish;Iain Campbell;Stuart Cobbe

  • Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity Associated With Symptom Provocation in Eating Disorders

    Rudolf Uher;Tara Murphy;Michael J. Brammer;Tim Dalgleish

  • A neurodevelopmental model for anorexia nervosa

    Frances Connan;Iain C Campbell;Melanie Katzman;Stafford L Lightman

  • Cerebral processing of food-related stimuli: effects of fasting and gender

    Rudolf Uher;Janet Treasure;Maike Heining;Michael J. Brammer

  • Functional Neuroanatomy of Body Shape Perception in Healthy and Eating-Disordered Women

    Rudolf Uher;Tara Murphy;Hans-Christoph Friederich;Tim Dalgleish

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behaviour.

    Samantha Brooks;Alexis Prince;Daniel Stahl;Iain C. Campbell

  • Eating disorders: the big issue

    Ulrike Schmidt;Roger Adan;Ilka Böhm;Iain C Campbell

  • Recovery and chronicity in anorexia nervosa: brain activity associated with differential outcomes.

    Rudolf Uher;Michael J Brammer;Tara Murphy;Iain C Campbell

  • A reward-centred model of anorexia nervosa: a focussed narrative review of the neurological and psychophysiological literature

    Caitlin B. O’Hara;Iain C. Campbell;Ulrike Schmidt

  • Differential Neural Responses to Food Images in Women with Bulimia versus Anorexia Nervosa

    Samantha J. Brooks;Owen G. O′Daly;Rudolf Uher;Hans-Christoph Friederich

  • A systematic review of the relationship between eating, weight and inhibitory control using the stop signal task.

    Savani Bartholdy;Bethan Dalton;Owen G. O’Daly;Iain C. Campbell

  • Cognitive remediation therapy for patients with anorexia nervosa: preliminary findings

    Kate Tchanturia;Helen Davies;Iain C Campbell

  • Increased sensitivity of dopamine receptors and recurrence of affective psychosis after childbirth.

    A Wieck;R Kumar;A D Hirst;M N Marks

  • Effect of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food craving.

    Rudolf Uher;Daniella Yoganathan;Andrew Mogg;Savithasri V. Eranti

  • A systematic review of the clinical efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in psychiatric disorders

    Maria Kekic;Elena Boysen;Iain Cameron Campbell;Ulrike Hermine Schmidt

  • Neuropsychological studies in anorexia nervosa

    Kate Tchanturia;Iain C. Campbell;Robin Morris;Janet Treasure

  • An investigation of decision making in anorexia nervosa using the Iowa Gambling Task and skin conductance measurements

    Kate Tchanturia;Pei-Chi Liao;Rudolf Uher;Natalia Lawrence

  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reduces Cue-Induced Food Craving in Bulimic Disorders

    Frederique Van den Eynde;Angelica M. Claudino;Angelica M. Claudino;Andrew Mogg;Linda Horrell

  • The effects of prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and temporal discounting in women with frequent food cravings.

    Maria Kekic;Jessica McClelland;Iain Campbell;Steffen Nestler

  • Differential motivational responses to food and pleasurable cues in anorexia and bulimia nervosa: a startle reflex paradigm

    Hans-Christoph Friederich;Veena Kumari;Rudolf Uher;Marianthy Riga

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrike Schmidt
Ulrike Schmidt King's College London
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London
Rudolf Uher
Rudolf Uher Dalhousie University
Michael Brammer
Michael Brammer King's College London
Kate Tchanturia
Kate Tchanturia King's College London
Owen O'Daly
Owen O'Daly King's College London
Dennis L. Murphy
Dennis L. Murphy National Institutes of Health
Samantha J. Brooks
Samantha J. Brooks Liverpool John Moores University
Sébastien Guillaume
Sébastien Guillaume University of Montpellier
David A. Collier
David A. Collier Eli Lilly (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a wide range of fulfilling careers, particularly in the field of substance abuse counseling. Online psychology programs provide flexibility and access to essential coursework, making it easier to balance studies with personal commitments.

Becoming a substance abuse counselor often requires a combination of educational qualifications, state-specific certifications, and real-world training. For instance, those interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Indianapolis will need to follow Indiana’s licensing process, which includes education, supervised experience, and exams. On the West Coast, guidance on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Irvine highlights the distinct requirements in California, such as specific supervised practice hours.

Similarly, those seeking to understand substance abuse counselor requirements in Irving will find that Texas has its own set of credentials and training. Meanwhile, substance abuse counselor requirements in Jacksonville provide a look into the Florida process, emphasizing state-specific coursework and internship obligations.

Online psychology degrees can help you meet these requirements by offering foundational knowledge and specialized training. Whether you plan to work in addiction services, mental health clinics, or community outreach, these pathways can lead to rewarding and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Iain C. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles