World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sébastien Guillaume

Sébastien Guillaume

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4047 3732 27 25 235 11783

Sébastien Guillaume publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sébastien Guillaume between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sébastien Guillaume published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2021. 13 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2021. 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
2007 2025

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sébastien Guillaume: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 4
2008 4
2009 5
2010 14
2011 14
2012 17
2013 22
2014 15
2015 22
2016 17
2017 9
2018 10
2019 19
2020 22
2021 25
2022 20
2023 9
2024 6
2025 7
Total 261
Download as CSV

Sébastien Guillaume publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sébastien Guillaume sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 235 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 235
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sébastien Guillaume D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sébastien Guillaume sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sébastien Guillaume is affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France. Their research primarily revolves around psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on clinical psychology and psychiatry and mental health. They have contributed significantly to the understanding of eating disorders, suicide and self-harm studies, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, among other topics.

Their extensive body of work includes over 100 publications in psychology and 60+ in medicine. Key subfields of study include clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, public health, environmental and occupational health, genetics, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Major topics addressed in their research include:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders

Guillaume has published in various academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Nutrients
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
  • European Psychiatry

They have collaborated extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Philippe Courtet
  • Émilie Olié
  • Maude Sénèque
  • Laurent Maïmoun
  • Philip Gorwood

Among their recent published papers are:

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms (2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • Genetic identification of cell types underlying brain complex traits yields insights into the etiology of Parkinson's disease (2020, Nature Genetics)
  • COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population (2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • "Waste not and stay at home" evidence of decreased food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic from the U.S. and Italy (2021, Appetite)
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A potential new peripheral biomarker of suicidal behavior (2020, European Psychiatry)

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa

    Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Hunna J. Watson;Zeynep Yilmaz;Laura M. Thornton;Christopher Hübel;Christopher Hübel

  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on eating disorder risk and symptoms.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Caterina Lombardo;Silvia Cerolini;Debra L. Franko

  • Increased methylation of glucocorticoid receptor gene ( NR3C1 ) in adults with a history of childhood maltreatment: a link with the severity and type of trauma

    N Perroud;A Paoloni-Giacobino;P Prada;E Olié;E Olié

  • The suicidal mind and brain: A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies

    Fabrice Jollant;Natalia L Lawrence;Emilie Olié;Sébastien Guillaume

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    R. C. Culverhouse;N. L. Saccone;A. C. Horton;Y. Ma

  • Anhedonia is associated with suicidal ideation independently of depression: A meta-analysis.

    Déborah Ducasse;Gwenolé Loas;Déborah Dassa;Carla Gramaglia

  • Is it valid to measure suicidal ideation by depression rating scales

    Martin Desseilles;Martin Desseilles;Martin Desseilles;Nader Perroud;Sébastien Guillaume;Isabelle Jaussent

  • Guidelines for the use and management of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in serious mental illness.

    Pierre Michel Llorca;Mocrane Abbar;Philippe Courtet;Sebastien Guillaume

  • Higher psychological pain during a major depressive episode may be a factor of vulnerability to suicidal ideation and act

    Emilie Olié;Sébastien Guillaume;Sébastien Guillaume;Isabelle Jaussent;Isabelle Jaussent;Philippe Courtet;Philippe Courtet

  • COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and problematic eating behaviors in a student population

    Valentin Flaudias;Sylvain Iceta;Sylvain Iceta;Oulmann Zerhouni;Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers

  • Structural magnetic resonance imaging in eating disorders: a systematic review of voxel-based morphometry studies

    Frederique Van den Eynde;Masashi Suda;Hannah Broadbent;Sébastien Guillaume;Sébastien Guillaume

  • Trait-related decision-making impairment in the three phases of bipolar disorder

    Marc Adida;Fabrice Jollant;Luke Clark;Nathalie Besnier

  • Psychological Pain in Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis.

    Déborah Ducasse;Ronald R. Holden;Laurent Boyer;Sylvaine Artéro

  • Somatic markers and explicit knowledge are both involved in decision-making.

    Sébastien Guillaume;Sébastien Guillaume;Fabrice Jollant;Fabrice Jollant;Isabelle Jaussent;Isabelle Jaussent;Natalia Lawrence

  • Associations between adverse childhood experiences and clinical characteristics of eating disorders

    S. Guillaume;I. Jaussent;Laurent Maïmoun;A. Ryst

  • Neuroinflammation in suicide: Toward a comprehensive model

    Philippe Courtet;Lucas Giner;Maude Seneque;Sebastien Guillaume

  • A meta-analysis of cytokines in suicidal behavior

    Déborah Ducasse;Emilie Olié;Sébastien Guillaume;Sylvaine Artéro

  • Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of suicide risk.

    Mathilde Husky;Emilie Olié;Sébastien Guillaume;Catherine Genty

  • Neurocognition in bulimic eating disorders : a systematic review

    F. Van den Eynde;S. Guillaume;S. Guillaume;H. Broadbent;D. Stahl

  • Borderline personality disorder and childhood maltreatment: a genome-wide methylation analysis.

    Julien Prados;Ludwig Stenz;P Courtet;Paco Boris Prada

  • Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression

    Robert C. Culverhouse;Nancy L. Saccone;Amy C. Horton;Yinjiao Ma

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Courtet
Philippe Courtet University of Montpellier
Emilie Olié
Emilie Olié Grenoble Alpes University
Fabrice Jollant
Fabrice Jollant University of Paris-Saclay
Jorge Lopez-Castroman
Jorge Lopez-Castroman University of Santiago de Compostela
Ulrike Schmidt
Ulrike Schmidt King's College London
Philip Gorwood
Philip Gorwood Université Paris Cité
Nader Perroud
Nader Perroud University of Geneva
Marion Leboyer
Marion Leboyer Paris-Est Créteil University
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and specialized pathways. Many students interested in helping others find marriage and family therapy (MFT) a rewarding option. Each state—and even each city—may have its own requirements for education, licensing, and certification.

For example, those exploring mft requirements in Dallas will need to meet specific educational prerequisites and gain supervised clinical experience before applying for state licensure. Similarly, if you’re interested in Colorado, it’s essential to understand the exact Denver mft certification requirements.

Michigan and North Carolina also have unique specifications. It’s helpful to research the Detroit mft education requirements as well as know exactly how to become an mft in Durham before selecting your degree program.

Exploring online degree options and understanding local licensure requirements is a vital part of preparing for a successful career in psychology or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Sébastien Guillaume

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles