World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 111 836 798 507 480 882 54412
Medicine 115 4486 4209 2439 2259 881 57845

Christine Miaskowski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine Miaskowski between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine Miaskowski published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 18.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2021. 38 of the 906 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2021. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 35 publications 2010: 37 publications 2011: 48 publications 2012: 42 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 46 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 48 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 15 publications
1978 2025

906 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine Miaskowski: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 4
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 2
1990 11
1991 6
1992 15
1993 10
1994 10
1995 10
1996 10
1997 14
1998 8
1999 10
2000 16
2001 15
2002 18
2003 14
2004 22
2005 21
2006 18
2007 16
2008 28
2009 35
2010 37
2011 48
2012 42
2013 27
2014 39
2015 28
2016 34
2017 46
2018 35
2019 34
2020 32
2021 59
2022 48
2023 40
2024 23
2025 15
Total 906
Download as CSV

Christine Miaskowski publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Miaskowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 881 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 881
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine Miaskowski D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Miaskowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393 115
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Christine Miaskowski is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. The primary field of their research is Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Physiology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Family Support in Illness
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment

Among recent publications featuring their work are:

  • "Stress and Symptom Burden in Oncology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • "Loneliness and symptom burden in oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2021, Cancer

Other notable papers co-authored alongside Christine Miaskowski but led by different authors include:

  • "Real time remote symptom monitoring during chemotherapy for cancer: European multicentre randomised controlled trial (eSMART)," 2021, BMJ
  • "Symptom clusters in patients receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review," 2021, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
  • "Identifying Symptom Information in Clinical Notes Using Natural Language Processing," 2020, Nursing Research

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Christine Miaskowski include:

  • Yvette P. Conley
  • Steven M. Paul
  • Kord M. Kober
  • Marilyn J. Hammer
  • Jon D. Levine

Christine Miaskowski has published often in several key venues within their research area, including:

  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Cancer Nursing
  • Seminars in Oncology Nursing
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • Oncology Nursing Forum

Best Publications

  • Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations.

    Robert H. Dworkin;Alec B. O'Connor;Miroslav Backonja;John T. Farrar

  • Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain

    Roger Chou;Gilbert J. Fanciullo;Perry G. Fine;Jeremy A. Adler

  • Recommendations for the Pharmacological Management of Neuropathic Pain: An Overview and Literature Update

    Robert H. Dworkin;Alec B. O'Connor;Joseph Audette;Ralf Baron

  • Impact of Cancer-Related Fatigue on the Lives of Patients: New Findings From the Fatigue Coalition

    Gregory A. Curt;William Breitbart;David Cella;Jerome E. Groopman

  • Advancing the science of symptom management.

    Marylin Dodd;Susan Janson;Noreen Facione;Julia Faucett

  • Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer.

    Marylin J. Dodd;Christine Miaskowski;Steven M. Paul

  • American Pain Society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management: American Pain Society quality of care task force

    Debra B. Gordon;June L. Dahl;Christine Miaskowski;Bill McCarberg

  • Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer.

    Una Stenberg;Cornelia M. Ruland;Cornelia M. Ruland;Christine Miaskowski;Christine Miaskowski

  • The prevalence, severity, and impact of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: results of a US and European Patient Survey (PROBE 1)

    Timothy J. Bell;Sunil J. Panchal;Christine Miaskowski;Susan C. Bolge

  • Kappa–opioids produce significantly greater analgesia in women than in men

    Robert W. Gear;Christine Miaskowski;Newton C. Gordon;Steven M. Paul

  • Management of Chronic Pain in Survivors of Adult Cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

    Judith A. Paice;Russell Portenoy;Christina Lacchetti;Toby Campbell

  • Research Gaps on Use of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Findings From a Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline

    Roger Chou;Jane C. Ballantyne;Gilbert J. Fanciullo;Perry G. Fine

  • Symptom clusters: the new frontier in symptom management research.

    Christine Miaskowski;Marylin Dodd;Kathryn Lee

  • Opioids for chronic noncancer pain: prediction and identification of aberrant drug-related behaviors: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine clinical practice guideline.

    Roger Chou;Gilbert J. Fanciullo;Perry G. Fine;Christine Miaskowski

  • Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Disturbances in Oncology Outpatients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis: A Pilot Study

    Christine Miaskowski;Kathryn A. Lee

  • Burn Injury Pain: The Continuing Challenge

    Gretchen J. Summer;Kathleen A. Puntillo;Christine Miaskowski;Paul G. Green

  • Subgroups of patients with cancer with different symptom experiences and quality-of-life outcomes: a cluster analysis.

    Christine Miaskowski;Bruce A. Cooper;Steven M. Paul;Marylin Dodd

  • The kappa opioid nalbuphine produces gender- and dose-dependent analgesia and antianalgesia in patients with postoperative pain

    Robert W. Gear;Christine Miaskowski;Newton C. Gordon;Steven M. Paul

  • Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in the general Norwegian population

    Tone Rustøen;Astrid Klopstad Wahl;Berit Rokne Hanestad;Anners Lerdal;Anners Lerdal

  • Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying.

    Kathleen A. Puntillo;Shoshana Arai;Neal H. Cohen;Michael A. Gropper

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven M. Paul
Steven M. Paul University of California, San Francisco
Bradley E. Aouizerat
Bradley E. Aouizerat New York University
Jon D. Levine
Jon D. Levine University of California, San Francisco
Kathryn A. Lee
Kathryn A. Lee University of California, San Francisco
William M. Wara
William M. Wara Kaiser Permanente
John Neuhaus
John Neuhaus University of California, San Francisco
Margaret A. Chesney
Margaret A. Chesney University of California, San Francisco
David R. Bangsberg
David R. Bangsberg Simon Fraser University
Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Katherine K. Matthay
Katherine K. Matthay University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to many related fields that can be accessed through flexible online study. For those interested in mental health, online msn pmhnp programs allow registered nurses to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, preparing them for advanced clinical roles.

If you are interested in the business side of healthcare, healthcare administration degrees offer foundational training in policies, management, and leadership. For those seeking higher-level positions, choosing an affordable mha online program can provide a cost-effective path to an advanced administrative career.

Nurses looking to achieve the highest level of practice may consider cheap dnp online programs. These Doctor of Nursing Practice degrees develop leadership and clinical expertise while maintaining flexibility for working professionals.

Exploring these online medical and healthcare-related programs can help you expand your career opportunities, enhance your knowledge, and achieve your professional goals—all from virtually anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Miaskowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles