World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
31653
World Ranking
13543
National Ranking
6886

John Neuhaus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Neuhaus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 332 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Neuhaus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Neuhaus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Neuhaus is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, specializing primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research topics reflect a focus on brain-related health issues and broader medical concerns. Key topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

John Neuhaus has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals, frequently publishing in these venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Brain
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • JAMA Network Open

Recent publications illustrate a diverse range of interests and collaborative work. Selected papers include:

  • Efficacy of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Insomnia Symptoms Among Pregnant Women, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Big smile, small self: Awe walks promote prosocial positive emotions in older adults, 2020, Emotion
  • Anatomically interpretable deep learning of brain age captures domain-specific cognitive impairment, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Divergent Cortical Tau Positron Emission Tomography Patterns Among Patients With Preclinical Alzheimer Disease, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Plasma phosphorylated-tau181 as a predictive biomarker for Alzheimer's amyloid, tau and FDG PET status, 2021, Translational Psychiatry

Neuhaus has a record of collaboration with several frequent co-authors involved extensively in related research fields. These include Rachel L. Nosheny, Michael W. Weiner, Chengshi Jin, Miriam T. Ashford, and Richard J. Perrin.

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus.

    Brian K. Alldredge;Alan M. Gelb;S. Marshal Isaacs;Megan D. Corry

  • Generalized Linear Mixed Models

    Charles E. McCulloch;John M. Neuhaus

  • Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Diagnosis of Meningitis and Encephalitis

    Michael R Wilson;Hannah A Sample;Kelsey C Zorn;Shaun Arevalo

  • Unanticipated Admission to the Hospital Following Ambulatory Surgery

    Barbara S. Gold;Deborah S. Kitz;John H. Lecky;John M. Neuhaus

  • Saw Palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

    Stephen Bent;Christopher Kane;Katsuto Shinohara;John Neuhaus

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients.

    Julene K. Johnson;Janine Diehl;Mario F. Mendez;John Neuhaus

  • Locus coeruleus volume and cell population changes during Alzheimer's disease progression: A stereological study in human postmortem brains with potential implication for early-stage biomarker discovery

    Panos Theofilas;Alexander J. Ehrenberg;Sara Dunlop;Ana T. Di Lorenzo Alho

  • Comparison of family histories in FTLD subtypes and related tauopathies

    J. S. Goldman;J. M. Farmer;E. M. Wood;J. K. Johnson

  • Serum Fatty Acids and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease

    Joel A. Simon;Michael L. Hodgkins;Warren S. Browner;Warren S. Browner;John M. Neuhaus

  • Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study

    M A Davis;W H Ettinger;J M Neuhaus;K P Mallon

  • THE ASSOCIATION OF KNEE INJURY AND OBESITY WITH UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE

    Maradee A. Davis;Walter H. Ettinger;John M. Neuhaus;Sangsook A. Cho

  • Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying.

    Kathleen A. Puntillo;Shoshana Arai;Neal H. Cohen;Michael A. Gropper

  • Long-term physical functioning in persons with knee osteoarthritis from NHANES. I: Effects of comorbid medical conditions.

    Walter H. Ettinger;Maradee A. Davis;John M. Neuhaus;Kenneth P. Mallon

  • Recruitment and Retention of Healthy Minority Women into Community-Based Longitudinal Research

    Catherine L. Gilliss;Kathryn A. Lee;Yolanda Gutierrez;Diana Taylor

  • Language networks in semantic dementia

    Federica Agosta;Roland G. Henry;Raffaella Migliaccio;Raffaella Migliaccio;John Neuhaus

  • Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses

    John M Neuhaus

  • Clinical features and outcomes in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma.

    Mark A. Applebaum;Jennifer Worch;Katherine K. Matthay;Robert Goldsby

  • Familial and Personal Medical History of Cancer and Nervous System Conditions among Adults with Glioma and Controls

    Margaret Wrensch;Marion Lee;Rei Miike;Beth Newman

  • Obesity and osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I)

    Maradee A. Davis;Walter H. Ettinger;John M. Neuhaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce L. Miller
Bruce L. Miller University of California, San Francisco
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
Mary N. Haan
Mary N. Haan University of California, San Francisco
Charles E. McCulloch
Charles E. McCulloch University of California, San Francisco
Steven M. Paul
Steven M. Paul University of California, San Francisco
Christine Miaskowski
Christine Miaskowski University of California, San Francisco
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco
Bradley E. Aouizerat
Bradley E. Aouizerat New York University
William W. Seeley
William W. Seeley University of California, San Francisco
Lea T. Grinberg
Lea T. Grinberg University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, exploring related online degrees can help you enter the healthcare field faster and often at a lower cost. For students seeking flexible study options, many universities now offer affordable nursing programs online. These programs enable you to earn a degree without the need to relocate or interrupt your current commitments.

Nurses looking to advance their careers might consider pursuing higher degrees through some of the cheapest dnp programs online. These doctoral programs are designed for working professionals aiming for leadership or advanced clinical roles.

If you already hold a registered nurse license, bridge programs such as rn to bsn cheapest options help you earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing quickly and affordably. These pathways can boost your job prospects and earning potential.

For non-nurses, there are also direct entry msn programs that accept students from other fields, offering a direct route into nursing with a master’s degree. Exploring these alternatives can open diverse opportunities within the healthcare sector, even if you do not plan to pursue a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing John Neuhaus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles