World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
10323
World Ranking
9993
National Ranking
4211

Sharad Agarwal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharad Agarwal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 110 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sharad Agarwal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharad Agarwal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2010 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Sharad Agarwal is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed to the field of Computer Science, with a specific focus on multiple subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, and Artificial Intelligence. Their research portfolio includes topics such as Software System Performance and Reliability, IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Caching and Content Delivery, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, FinTech, Crowdfunding and Digital Finance, and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies.

The scientist has coauthored publications with several frequent collaborators, including Marie Vasek, Gilberto Atondo Siu, Marilyne Ordekian, Alice Hutchings, and Enrico Mariconti.

Sharad Agarwal's recent papers reflect a range of interests across computing and information systems. Notable publications include:

  • "The Emerging Landscape of Edge Computing", 2020, GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications
  • "Automatic log analysis with NLP for the CMS workflow handling", 2020, EPJ Web of Conferences
  • "LLexus: an AI agent system for incident management", 2024, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
  • "Vronicle: A System for Producing Videos with Verifiable Provenance", 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Shopping Websites", 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society

Frequent publication venues for Sharad Agarwal include Harvard Dataverse, GetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, EPJ Web of Conferences, and arXiv (Cornell University).

Sharad Agarwal has been recognized by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) as a Distinguished Member since 2017 and as a Senior Member since 2010.

Best Publications

  • Apache Hadoop YARN: yet another resource negotiator

    Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli;Arun C. Murthy;Chris Douglas;Sharad Agarwal

  • Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple vantage points

    L. Subramanian;S. Agarwal;J. Rexford;R.H. Katz

  • Home automation in the wild: challenges and opportunities

    A.J. Bernheim Brush;Bongshin Lee;Ratul Mahajan;Sharad Agarwal

  • Distributed power control in ad-hoc wireless networks

    S. Agarwal;R.H. Katz;S.V. Krishnamurthy;S.K. Dao

  • Volley: automated data placement for geo-distributed cloud services

    Sharad Agarwal;John Dunagan;Navendu Jain;Stefan Saroiu

  • Estimation of link interference in static multi-hop wireless networks

    Jitendra Padhye;Sharad Agarwal;Venkata N. Padmanabhan;Lili Qiu

  • MCDNN: An Approximation-Based Execution Framework for Deep Stream Processing Under Resource Constraints

    Seungyeop Han;Haichen Shen;Matthai Philipose;Sharad Agarwal

  • An operating system for the home

    Colin Dixon;Ratul Mahajan;Sharad Agarwal;A. J. Brush

  • Detailed diagnosis in enterprise networks

    Srikanth Kandula;Ratul Mahajan;Patrick Verkaik;Sharad Agarwal

  • AppInsight: mobile app performance monitoring in the wild

    Lenin Ravindranath;Jitendra Padhye;Sharad Agarwal;Ratul Mahajan

  • Matchmaking for online games and other latency-sensitive P2P systems

    Sharad Agarwal;Jacob R. Lorch

  • Virtual compass: relative positioning to sense mobile social interactions

    Nilanjan Banerjee;Sharad Agarwal;Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra

  • Barometric phone sensors: more hype than hope!

    Kartik Muralidharan;Azeem Javed Khan;Archan Misra;Rajesh Krishna Balan

  • The SAHARA Model for Service Composition across Multiple Providers

    Bhaskaran Raman;Sharad Agarwal;Yan Chen;Matthew Caesar

  • Mobile Device Safe Driving

    Joseph A. Schrader;Raman K. Sarin;Ted Tai-Yu Chen;Sharad Agarwal

  • Feasibility study of mesh networks for all-wireless offices

    Jakob Eriksson;Sharad Agarwal;Paramvir Bahl;Jitendra Padhye

  • OPCA: robust interdomain policy routing and traffic control

    S. Agarwal;Chen-Nee Chuah;R.H. Katz

  • Switchboard: a matchmaking system for multiplayer mobile games

    Justin Manweiler;Sharad Agarwal;Ming Zhang;Romit Roy Choudhury

  • The impact of BGP dynamics on intra-domain traffic

    Sharad Agarwal;Chen-Nee Chuah;Supratik Bhattacharyya;Christophe Diot

  • The home needs an operating system (and an app store)

    Colin Dixon;Ratul Mahajan;Sharad Agarwal;A. J. Brush

Frequent Co-Authors

Ratul Mahajan
Ratul Mahajan University of Washington
Jitendra Padhye
Jitendra Padhye Microsoft (United States)
Venkata N. Padmanabhan
Venkata N. Padmanabhan Microsoft (United States)
Paramvir Bahl
Paramvir Bahl Microsoft (United States)
Ming Zhang
Ming Zhang Alibaba Group (China)
Randy H. Katz
Randy H. Katz University of California, Berkeley
Stefan Saroiu
Stefan Saroiu Microsoft (United States)
Alec Wolman
Alec Wolman Microsoft (United States)
Daniel R. Simon
Daniel R. Simon Microsoft (United States)
David A. Maltz
David A. Maltz Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various related disciplines available through flexible online programs. Many students compare mechanical engineering degree online cost to find options that balance affordability with quality education in engineering.

If you’re interested in the fundamentals of science, pursuing the best online physics degree can equip you with analytical and problem-solving skills highly valued in technical careers.

For those looking toward high-growth fields, accredited data science degrees offer training in analytics, machine learning, and big data—key areas for future tech professionals.

Similarly, aspiring engineers can find programs from top online electrical engineering schools, providing flexible pathways into innovative technology sectors.

These online degree options expand your career potential and allow you to specialize or cross-train in fields closely tied to computer science, combining convenience with strong professional prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Sharad Agarwal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles