World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
14750
World Ranking
7017
National Ranking
422

Steve Uhlig publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Uhlig sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steve Uhlig D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Uhlig sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Uhlig is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions in the areas of computer networks and communications, information systems, and artificial intelligence. The scientist has published extensively, with 118 works classified under computer science and a strong emphasis on subfields such as computer networks and communications (57 publications), information systems (27 publications), artificial intelligence (24 publications), education (7 publications), and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging (5 publications).

The main research topics explored by Steve Uhlig include IoT and edge/fog computing, cloud computing and resource management, blockchain technology applications and security, caching and content delivery, software-defined networks and 5G, data stream mining techniques, and COVID-19 diagnosis using AI.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Internet of Things
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Collaborators often working with Steve Uhlig include:

  • Sukhpal Singh Gill
  • Muhammed Golec
  • Huaming Wu
  • Minxian Xu
  • Félix Cuadrado

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Steve Uhlig are:

  • "AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions" (2022, Internet of Things)
  • "Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots" (2023, Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems)
  • "AI-based fog and edge computing: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions" (2022, Internet of Things)
  • "Modern computing: Vision and challenges" (2024, Telematics and Informatics Reports)
  • "HunterPlus: AI based energy-efficient task scheduling for cloud-fog computing environments" (2022, Internet of Things)

Best Publications

  • Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey

    Diego Kreutz;Fernando M. V. Ramos;Paulo Esteves Verissimo;Christian Esteve Rothenberg

  • Providing public intradomain traffic matrices to the research community

    Steve Uhlig;Bruno Quoitin;Jean Lepropre;Simon Balon

  • Elastic sketch: adaptive and fast network-wide measurements

    Tong Yang;Jie Jiang;Peng Liu;Qun Huang

  • IP geolocation databases: unreliable?

    Ingmar Poese;Steve Uhlig;Mohamed Ali Kaafar;Benoit Donnet

  • Anatomy of a large european IXP

    Bernhard Ager;Nikolaos Chatzis;Anja Feldmann;Nadi Sarrar

  • OFLOPS: an open framework for openflow switch evaluation

    Charalampos Rotsos;Nadi Sarrar;Steve Uhlig;Rob Sherwood

  • Interdomain traffic engineering with BGP

    B. Quoitin;C. Pelsser;L. Swinnen;O. Bonaventure

  • Building an AS-topology model that captures route diversity

    Wolfgang Mühlbauer;Anja Feldmann;Olaf Maennel;Matthew Roughan

  • Modeling the routing of an autonomous system with C-BGP

    B. Quoitin;S. Uhlig

  • Pushing CDN-ISP collaboration to the limit

    Benjamin Frank;Ingmar Poese;Yin Lin;Georgios Smaragdakis

  • On the relationship between the algebraic connectivity and graph's robustness to node and link failures

    A. Jamakovic;S. Uhlig

  • Comparing DNS resolvers in the wild

    Bernhard Ager;Wolfgang Mühlbauer;Georgios Smaragdakis;Steve Uhlig

  • Open Connect Everywhere: A Glimpse at the Internet Ecosystem through the Lens of the Netflix CDN

    Timm Böttger;Felix Cuadrado;Gareth Tyson;Ignacio Castro

  • Optimal cache allocation for Content-Centric Networking

    Yonggong Wang;Zhenyu Li;Gareth Tyson;Steve Uhlig

  • Leveraging Zipf's law for traffic offloading

    Nadi Sarrar;Steve Uhlig;Anja Feldmann;Rob Sherwood

  • HeavyKeeper: An Accurate Algorithm for Finding Top-$k$ Elephant Flows

    Tong Yang;Haowei Zhang;Jinyang Li;Junzhi Gong

  • Cold Filter: A Meta-Framework for Faster and More Accurate Stream Processing

    Yang Zhou;Tong Yang;Jie Jiang;Bin Cui

  • Internet optometry: assessing the broken glasses in internet reachability

    Randy Bush;Olaf Maennel;Matthew Roughan;Steve Uhlig

  • Web content cartography

    Bernhard Ager;Wolfgang Mühlbauer;Georgios Smaragdakis;Steve Uhlig

  • Weighted spectral distribution for internet topology analysis: theory and applications

    Damien Fay;Hamed Haddadi;Andrew Thomason;Andrew W. Moore

  • HeavyKeeper: An Accurate Algorithm for Finding Top-k Elephant Flows.

    Junzhi Gong;Tong Yang;Haowei Zhang;Hao Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Anja Feldmann
Anja Feldmann Max Planck Society
Olivier Bonaventure
Olivier Bonaventure Université Catholique de Louvain
Richard Mortier
Richard Mortier University of Cambridge
Georgios Smaragdakis
Georgios Smaragdakis Delft University of Technology
Hamed Haddadi
Hamed Haddadi Imperial College London
Gaogang Xie
Gaogang Xie Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stefan Schmid
Stefan Schmid Technical University of Berlin
Mohamed Ali Kaafar
Mohamed Ali Kaafar Macquarie University
Matthew Roughan
Matthew Roughan University of Adelaide
Walter Willinger
Walter Willinger NIKSUN, Inc.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens a world of career opportunities, both on-campus and through flexible, remote learning. With increased demand for tech skills, many students now consider online accredited colleges for affordability and accessibility. These institutions offer rigorous programs featuring the same curriculum and outcomes as traditional universities.

Specializing in areas such as game development is easier than ever, thanks to the availability of targeted programs like the game development online degree. Students interested in digital entertainment, game design, and interactive technology can start their journey from anywhere.

Cybersecurity remains a critical field with high employability. Consider earning a cyber security masters degree online to open doors in data protection, ethical hacking, and information assurance.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and infrastructure, a cheapest construction management degree can lead to roles in project management, planning, and real-world tech applications.

Exploring these online educational options provides flexibility, affordability, and diverse career pathways for aspiring tech professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Uhlig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles