World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
4556
World Ranking
13145
National Ranking
112

Xenofontas Dimitropoulos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xenofontas Dimitropoulos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xenofontas Dimitropoulos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xenofontas Dimitropoulos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Xenofontas Dimitropoulos is affiliated with the University of Crete in Greece. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with notable work in the subfields of computer networks and communications as well as artificial intelligence.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
  • Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Xenofontas Dimitropoulos has contributed to academic literature with publications in prominent venues. One of their recent papers is titled "O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs", published in 2020 in the IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. This paper has been cited 17 times.

Their frequent publication venue includes:

  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Vasileios Giotsas
  • George G. Nomikos
  • Vasileios Kotronis
  • Pavlos Sermpezis
  • Petros Gigis

This collaborative network connects Xenofontas Dimitropoulos to a range of research projects within their fields of study, facilitating multidisciplinary approaches in their areas of focus.

Best Publications

  • The internet AS-level topology: three data sources and one definitive metric

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • AS relationships: inference and validation

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • SEPIA: privacy-preserving aggregation of multi-domain network events and statistics

    Martin Burkhart;Mario Strasser;Dilip Many;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • The Internet AS-Level Topology: Three Data Sources and One Definitive Metric

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • Anomaly extraction in backbone networks using association rules

    Daniela Brauckhoff;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Arno Wagner;Kavé Salamatian

  • Histogram-based traffic anomaly detection

    A. Kind;M.P. Stoecklin;X. Dimitropoulos

  • Outsourcing the routing control logic: better internet routing based on SDN principles

    Vasileios Kotronis;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Bernhard Ager

  • Digital discrimination: Political bias in Internet service provision across ethnic groups

    Nils B. Weidmann;Suso Benitez-Baleato;Suso Benitez-Baleato;Philipp Hunziker;Eduard Glatz

  • Probabilistic lossy counting: an efficient algorithm for finding heavy hitters

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Paul Hurley;Andreas Kind

  • Anomaly extraction in backbone networks using association rules

    Daniela Brauckhoff;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Arno Wagner;Kavè Salamatian

  • Lessons from Three Views of the Internet Topology

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri V. Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

  • Classifying internet one-way traffic

    Eduard Glatz;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • ARTEMIS: Neutralizing BGP Hijacking Within a Minute

    Pavlos Sermpezis;Vasileios Kotronis;Petros Gigis;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • On the 95-Percentile Billing Method

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Paul Hurley;Andreas Kind;Marc Ph. Stoecklin

  • Design and Development of Software Defined Metamaterials for Nanonetworks

    Christos Liaskos;Ageliki Tsioliaridou;Andreas Pitsillides;Ian F. Akyildiz

  • Revealing the Autonomous System Taxonomy: The Machine Learning Approach

    Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos;Dmitri V. Krioukov;George F. Riley;Kimberly C. Claffy

  • Determination of Network Topology Using Flow-Based Traffic Information

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Andreas Kind;Bernhard Jansen;Jeroen Massar

  • Graph annotations in modeling complex network topologies

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Amin Vahdat;George Riley

  • Estimating internet address space usage through passive measurements

    Alberto Dainotti;Karyn Benson;Alistair King;kc claffy

  • Inferring AS relationships: dead end or lively beginning?

    Xenofontas Dimitropoulos;Dmitri Krioukov;Bradley Huffaker;kc claffy

  • A novel framework for modeling and mitigating distributed link flooding attacks

    Christos Liaskos;Vasileios Kotronis;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • Digging into HTTPS: flow-based classification of webmail traffic

    Dominik Schatzmann;Wolfgang Mühlbauer;Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • Visualizing big network traffic data using frequent pattern mining and hypergraphs

    Eduard Glatz;Stelios Mavromatidis;Bernhard Ager;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • Practical anomaly detection based on classifying frequent traffic patterns

    Ignasi Paredes-Oliva;Ismael Castell-Uroz;Pere Barlet-Ros;Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

  • Seven years in the life of Hypergiants' off-nets

    Petros Gigis;Matt Calder;Lefteris Manassakis;George Nomikos

  • Lessons from Three Views of the Internet Topology: Technical Report

    Priya Mahadevan;Dmitri Krioukov;Marina Fomenkov;Bradley Huffaker

Frequent Co-Authors

Dmitri Krioukov
Dmitri Krioukov Northeastern University
George F. Riley
George F. Riley Georgia Institute of Technology
Bradley Huffaker
Bradley Huffaker University of California, San Diego
Stefan Schmid
Stefan Schmid Technical University of Berlin
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
Michail Vlachos
Michail Vlachos University of Lausanne
Alex C. Snoeren
Alex C. Snoeren University of California, San Diego
Antonio Pescape
Antonio Pescape University of Naples Federico II
David M. Nicol
David M. Nicol University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nils B. Weidmann
Nils B. Weidmann University of Konstanz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a broad range of online degree and career opportunities. Many students consider closely related fields, such as engineering, for their strong job outlook and diverse applications. For example, if you’re interested in the intersection of hardware and software, you might want to look at the top online electrical engineering schools for programs that balance technical knowledge with real-world problem-solving skills.

For those seeking quick paths to employment or upskilling, there are easy licenses and certifications to get that can boost your resume and earning potential in a matter of months. Some students might prefer pursuing advanced qualifications through the shortest masters degree programs online, offering accelerated options in computer science, data analytics, and IT management.

Deciding which degree is most valuable for your goals is important. Take time to explore masters degrees that are worth it to discover which credentials align with high-demand, well-paid roles in technology. This combined approach helps ensure your study in computer science leads to strong career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Xenofontas Dimitropoulos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles