World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1373 1223 642 563 290 12063

Frances K. Barg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frances K. Barg between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frances K. Barg published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 10 of the 322 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

322 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frances K. Barg: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 10
2007 6
2008 11
2009 13
2010 9
2011 12
2012 18
2013 16
2014 19
2015 15
2016 23
2017 22
2018 20
2019 23
2020 28
2021 26
2022 12
2023 8
2024 6
2025 4
Total 322
Download as CSV

Frances K. Barg publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances K. Barg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 290
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Frances K. Barg D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances K. Barg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Frances K. Barg is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and has a research focus within the broad field of Medicine, with a total of 112 publications. Their work spans several significant subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Dermatology, Oncology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research addresses diverse topics relevant to healthcare and clinical practice. Key areas of focus are:

  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Frances K. Barg has contributed regularly to several academic journals, with frequent publications in these venues:

  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • JAMA Dermatology
  • The Oncologist
  • Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
  • Preventing Chronic Disease

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Frances K. Barg include:

  • "Research Techniques Made Simple: An Introduction to Qualitative Research," 2021, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • "What Matters to Patients and Their Families During and After Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study," 2021, American Journal of Critical Care
  • "Effectiveness and Ethics of Incentives for Research Participation," 2021, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "Prevalence of Continuous Pulse Oximetry Monitoring in Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis Not Requiring Supplemental Oxygen," 2020, JAMA
  • "Early Childhood Sleep Intervention in Urban Primary Care: Caregiver and Clinician Perspectives," 2020, Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Collaborations have been an important aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Whitney Eriksen (9 collaborations)
  • M. Elle Saine (8 collaborations)
  • Nandita Mitra (7 collaborations)
  • A. Bazen (6 collaborations)
  • Junko Takeshita (6 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Understanding Why Patients Of Low Socioeconomic Status Prefer Hospitals Over Ambulatory Care

    Shreya Kangovi;Frances K. Barg;Tamala Carter;Judith A. Long

  • Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior.

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Robert C Hornik;Bridget J Kelly;Dominick L Frosch

  • A Mixed-Methods Approach to Understanding Loneliness and Depression in Older Adults

    Frances K. Barg;Rebecca Huss-Ashmore;Marsha N. Wittink;Genevra F. Murray

  • Creating Demand for Prescription Drugs: A Content Analysis of Television Direct-to-Consumer Advertising

    Dominick L. Frosch;Patrick M. Krueger;Robert C. Hornik;Peter F. Cronholm

  • Promoters and barriers to fruit, vegetable, and fast-food consumption among urban, low-income African Americans--a qualitative approach.

    Sean C. Lucan;Frances K. Barg;Judith A. Long

  • Predictors of community therapists' use of therapy techniques in a large public mental health system.

    Rinad S. Beidas;Steven Marcus;Gregory A. Aarons;Kimberly E. Hoagwood

  • Unwritten Rules of Talking to Doctors About Depression: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

    Marsha N. Wittink;Frances K. Barg;Joseph J. Gallo

  • Older Patients' Aversion to Antidepressants

    Lane L. Givens;Catherine J. Datto;Catherine J. Datto;Katy Ruckdeschel;Katy Ruckdeschel;Kathryn Knott

  • “I Didn’t Want To Put Them Through That”: The Influence Of Children on Victim Decision-making in Intimate Partner Violence Cases

    Karin V. Rhodes;Catherine Cerulli;Melissa E. Dichter;Catherine L. Kothari

  • Needs of family caregivers of persons with cancer: a review.

    Andréa Maria Laizner;Linda M. Shegda Yost;Frances K. Barg;Ruth McCorkle

  • Acupuncture Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Sheila N Garland;Sharon X Xie;Kate DuHamel;Ting Bao

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • A Prospective Examination of Clinician and Supervisor Turnover Within the Context of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Publicly-Funded Mental Health System

    Rinad S. Beidas;Steven Marcus;Steven Marcus;Courtney Benjamin Wolk;Byron Powell;Byron Powell

  • "You Don't Want to Burden Them": Older Adults' Views on Family Involvement in Care

    Eileen Cahill;Lisa M. Lewis;Frances K. Barg;Hillary R. Bogner

  • Challenges Faced by Patients with Low Socioeconomic Status During the Post-Hospital Transition

    Shreya Kangovi;Frances K. Barg;Tamala Carter;Kathryn Levy

  • ‘Breaking It Down’: Patient-Clinician Communication and Prenatal Care Among African American Women of Low and Higher Literacy

    Ian Bennett;Julia Switzer;Abigail Aguirre;Kelley Evans

  • A description of a psychoeducational intervention for family caregivers of cancer patients

    Frances K. Barg;Jeannie V. Pasacreta;Isaac F. Nuamah;Karen D. Robinson

  • Older patients' aversion to antidepressants. A qualitative study.

    Jane L Givens;Catherine J Datto;Katy Ruckdeschel;Kathryn Knott

  • Contrasting parents' and pediatricians' perspectives on shared decision-making in ADHD.

    Alexander G. Fiks;Cayce C. Hughes;Angela Gafen;James P. Guevara

  • A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System

    Rinad S. Beidas;Rebecca E. Stewart;Danielle R. Adams;Tara Fernandez

Frequent Co-Authors

Rinad S. Beidas
Rinad S. Beidas University of Pennsylvania
David S. Mandell
David S. Mandell University of Pennsylvania
Ruth McCorkle
Ruth McCorkle Yale University
Stephen E. Kimmel
Stephen E. Kimmel University of Pennsylvania
Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Trevor R. Hadley
Trevor R. Hadley University of Pennsylvania
David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania
David Grande
David Grande University of Pennsylvania
Steven C. Marcus
Steven C. Marcus University of Pennsylvania
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can open doors to many rewarding fields such as psychology, education, and counseling. Thanks to advancements in online education, more students now have access to reputable programs that help them start or advance their careers — all from the comfort of home.

For those drawn to mental health professions, accredited online psyd programs offer a route to clinical practice, while the best online mft programs prepare graduates to become licensed marriage and family therapists. Both paths emphasize practical training and can lead to licensure in many states.

If you’re interested in deeper psychological study or research roles, earning your master in psychology online can be a flexible and affordable option. Educators seeking leadership roles can find 2 year ed.d programs online to fast-track their advancement in educational administration or policy.

These online degrees support various career pathways, blending academic rigor with accessibility. Before enrolling, review accreditation, program support, and licensing requirements to ensure your chosen path aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Frances K. Barg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles