World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
21413
World Ranking
19375
National Ranking
9646

Ruth McCorkle publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth McCorkle sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 339 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ruth McCorkle D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth McCorkle sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Best Publications

  • The relationship of depression and stressors to immunological assays: a meta-analytic review.

    Eric P. Zorrilla;Lester Luborsky;James R. McKay;Robert Rosenthal

  • Development of a symptom distress scale.

    Ruth Mccorkle;Katherine Young

  • Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness†‡

    Ruth McCorkle;Elizabeth Ercolano;Mark Lazenby;Mark Lazenby;Dena Schulman-Green

  • Processes of Self-Management in Chronic Illness

    Dena Schulman-Green;Sarah Jaser;Faith Martin;Angelo Alonzo

  • Fatigue and quality of life outcomes of exercise during cancer treatment.

    Victoria Mock;Mary Pickett;Mary E. Ropka;Esther Muscari Lin

  • Psychosocial Care for Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer

    Laurel Northouse;Anna-leila Williams;Barbara Given;Ruth McCorkle

  • Exercise manages fatigue during breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial

    Victoria Mock;Constantine Frangakis;Nancy E. Davidson;Mary E. Ropka

  • Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease.

    Ruth McCorkle;Jeanne Quint-Benoliel

  • A specialized home care intervention improves survival among older post-surgical cancer patients.

    Ruth Mccorkle;Neville E. Strumpf;Isaac F. Nuamah;Diane C. Adler

  • Impact of Financial Burden of Cancer on Survivors' Quality of Life?

    Kathleen M. Fenn;Suzanne B. Evans;Ruth McCorkle;Michael P. DiGiovanna

  • Enhancing Patient-Provider Communication With the Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer: A Randomized Trial

    Donna L. Berry;Brent A. Blumenstein;Barbara Halpenny;Seth Wolpin

  • A randomized clinical trial of home nursing care for lung cancer patients

    Ruth McCorkle;Jeanne Q. Benoliel;Gary Donaldson;Fotini Georgiadou

  • A framework for the study of self- and family management of chronic conditions

    Margaret Grey;Kathleen Knafl;Ruth McCorkle

  • Effect of a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention on Reducing Symptom Severity During Chemotherapy

    Charles Given;Barbara Given;Mohammad Rahbar;Sangchoon Jeon

  • Pain and fatigue management: results of a nursing randomized clinical trial.

    Barbara Given;Charles W. Given;Ruth McCorkle;Sharon Kozachik

  • Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: a review of the descriptive psychosocial literature.

    Anna-Leila Williams;Ruth McCorkle

  • Gender bias in the measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

    Manfred Stommel;Barbara A. Given;Charles W. Given;Hripsime A. Kalaian

  • Use of family proxies in quality of life research for cancer patients at the end of life: a literature review.

    Siew Tzuh Tang;Ruth McCorkle

  • Nurse Navigators in Early Cancer Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Edward H. Wagner;Evette J. Ludman;Erin J. Aiello Bowles;Robert Penfold

  • Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients

    Dena J. Schulman-Green;Aanand D. Naik;Elizabeth H. Bradley;Ruth McCorkle

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth H. Bradley
Elizabeth H. Bradley Vassar College
Barbara A. Given
Barbara A. Given Michigan State University
Charles W. Given
Charles W. Given Michigan State University
Frances K. Barg
Frances K. Barg University of Pennsylvania
Peter E. Schwartz
Peter E. Schwartz Yale University
Melinda L. Irwin
Melinda L. Irwin Yale University
Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Clifford Y. Ko
Clifford Y. Ko University of California, Los Angeles
Harvey A. Risch
Harvey A. Risch Yale University
Holly G. Prigerson
Holly G. Prigerson Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA also opens the door to a range of related online degrees and career pathways. These programs provide flexible, accredited options for those looking to enter healthcare or expand their expertise.

For those interested in nutrition and health, an online BS in nutrition offers foundational education in dietary science and wellness, preparing graduates for roles in public health, clinical settings, or private consultancy.

Aspiring healthcare leaders may benefit from cahme-accredited online mha programs, which equip students with advanced management skills essential for hospital administration and healthcare organizations.

Registered Nurses wishing to further their education can pursue rn to bsn programs that don’t require onsite clinicals, allowing them to earn their degree while balancing work and family obligations.

For the highest level of nursing practice, online dnp programs offer doctoral-level training in leadership, research, and evidence-based practice.

These flexible online pathways help pave the way for diverse healthcare careers and further professional development while accommodating busy schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth McCorkle

Recently Published Articles