World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6226 5782 2977 2713 126 6097

David Grande publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Grande between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Grande published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 7 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1997 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Grande: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 3
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 4
2008 1
2009 5
2010 3
2011 4
2012 5
2013 7
2014 9
2015 9
2016 18
2017 20
2018 17
2019 6
2020 11
2021 8
2022 3
2023 3
2024 3
2025 4
Total 145
Download as CSV

David Grande publications per year - data summary

  • David Grande, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pennsylvania, has 145 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 2000 and 2008, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 29 years in the span carry no publications at all (1998, 1999, 2001, 2002 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.6 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 21 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 5 publications (0.5 per year); 2007-2016: 65 publications (6.5 per year); 2017-2025: 75 publications (8.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

David Grande publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Grande sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 126 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 126
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David Grande publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • David Grande, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pennsylvania, records 126 publications - the 28th percentile of the discipline.
  • 28% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David Grande, and about 72% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and David Grande ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

David Grande D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Grande sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

David Grande D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • David Grande, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from University of Pennsylvania, records 37 D-Index - the 23rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 23% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than David Grande, and about 77% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and David Grande ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

David Grande is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on health professions, medicine, and social sciences with particular attention to general health professions, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, information systems, and public health.

Their scholarly output includes a diverse range of topics such as healthcare policy and management, mobile health and mHealth applications, COVID-19 digital contact tracing, privacy, security, and data protection, health literacy and information accessibility, patient satisfaction in healthcare, and primary care and health outcomes.

David Grande has contributed publications to a variety of academic journals. Their most frequent venues of publication include:

  • Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Health Affairs

Several selected papers illustrate the scope and evolution of their research interests:

  • Health Policy and Privacy Challenges Associated With Digital Technology (2020), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Consumer Views on Using Digital Data for COVID-19 Control in the United States (2021), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Consumer Willingness to Share Personal Digital Information for Health-Related Uses (2022), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Consumer Views on Privacy Protections and Sharing of Personal Digital Health Information (2023), published in JAMA Network Open
  • Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program Addresses Unmet Social Needs And Generates Positive Return On Investment (2020), published in Health Affairs

David Grande frequently collaborates with several coauthors, demonstrating recurring professional partnerships. Notable frequent coauthors include:

  • David A. Asch
  • Raina M. Merchant
  • Nandita Mitra
  • Carolyn C. Cannuscio
  • Meghana Sharma

Their work reflects significant engagement with issues related to digital health technologies, data privacy, and public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This combination of health professions expertise with digital and policy dimensions characterizes their interdisciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • Understanding Why Patients Of Low Socioeconomic Status Prefer Hospitals Over Ambulatory Care

    Shreya Kangovi;Frances K. Barg;Tamala Carter;Judith A. Long

  • Residents' suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals.

    Kevin G.M. Volpp;David Grande

  • Prior experiences of racial discrimination and racial differences in health care system distrust.

    Katrina Armstrong;Mary Putt;Chanita H. Halbert;David Grande

  • Patient-centered community health worker intervention to improve posthospital outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

    Shreya Kangovi;Nandita Mitra;Nandita Mitra;David Grande;David Grande;David Grande;Mary L. White

  • Community Health Worker Support for Disadvantaged Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Shreya Kangovi;Nandita Mitra;David Grande;Hairong Huo

  • Effect of Community Health Worker Support on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Income Patients Across Primary Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Shreya Kangovi;Nandita Mitra;Lindsey Norton;Rory Harte

  • Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program Addresses Unmet Social Needs And Generates Positive Return On Investment

    Shreya Kangovi;Nandita Mitra;David Grande;Judith A. Long

  • A Decade of Controversy: Balancing Policy With Evidence in the Regulation of Prescription Drug Advertising

    Dominick L. Frosch;David Grande;Derjung M. Tarn;Richard L. Kravitz

  • Public Preferences about Secondary Uses of Electronic Health Information

    David Grande;David Grande;Nandita Mitra;Anand Shah;Fei Wan

  • Hospital Readmissions—Not Just a Measure of Quality

    Shreya Kangovi;David Grande

  • Understanding the Leaky Pipeline: Perceived Barriers to Pursuing a Career in Medicine or Dentistry Among Underrepresented-in-Medicine Undergraduate Students

    Brandi Kaye Freeman;Alden Landry;Robert Trevino;David Grande

  • Association of Rideshare-Based Transportation Services and Missed Primary Care Appointments: A Clinical Trial

    Krisda H. Chaiyachati;Krisda H. Chaiyachati;Rebecca A. Hubbard;Alyssa Yeager;Brian Mugo

  • Challenges Faced by Patients with Low Socioeconomic Status During the Post-Hospital Transition

    Shreya Kangovi;Frances K. Barg;Tamala Carter;Kathryn Levy

  • Racial Disparities in Geographic Access to Primary Care in Philadelphia

    Elizabeth J. Brown;Daniel Polsky;Corentin M. Barbu;Jane W. Seymour

  • Effect of Exposure to Small Pharmaceutical Promotional Items on Treatment Preferences

    David Grande;Dominick L. Frosch;Andrew W. Perkins;Barbara E. Kahn

  • Beyond books: public libraries as partners for population health.

    Anna U. Morgan;Roxanne Dupuis;Bernadette D’Alonzo;Andria Johnson

  • Limiting the influence of pharmaceutical industry gifts on physicians: self-regulation or government intervention?

    David Grande

  • From Rhetoric to Reality — Community Health Workers in Post-Reform U.S. Health Care

    Shreya Kangovi;David Grande;Chau Trinh-Shevrin

  • Perceptions of readmitted patients on the transition from hospital to home.

    Shreya Kangovi;Shreya Kangovi;Shreya Kangovi;David Grande;David Grande;Patricia Meehan;Nandita Mitra

  • Rideshare-Based Medical Transportation for Medicaid Patients and Primary Care Show Rates: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of a Pilot Program.

    Krisda H. Chaiyachati;Rebecca A. Hubbard;Alyssa Yeager;Brian Mugo

  • Pharmaceutical Industry Gifts to Physicians: Patient Beliefs and Trust in Physicians and the Health Care System

    David Grande;Judy A. Shea;Katrina Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania
Katrina Armstrong
Katrina Armstrong Harvard University
Judy A. Shea
Judy A. Shea University of Pennsylvania
Sarah E. Gollust
Sarah E. Gollust University of Minnesota
Craig Evan Pollack
Craig Evan Pollack Johns Hopkins University
Frances K. Barg
Frances K. Barg University of Pennsylvania
Daniel Polsky
Daniel Polsky Johns Hopkins University
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania
Charles C. Branas
Charles C. Branas Columbia University
Kevin G. Volpp
Kevin G. Volpp University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career pathways in fields like counseling, social work, education, and behavioral analysis. Today, more students are turning to online degrees for flexibility and affordability.

Many universities now offer 1 year masters programs online, allowing students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce quickly. For those starting out, pursuing an online bachelor's degree in social sciences or humanities is a practical way to build foundational skills and knowledge.

Aspiring social workers should consider msw programs that are both flexible and budget-friendly, providing professional training for a variety of roles in public service and mental health. Those interested in behavioral health can look into bcba online programs, which prepare graduates to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts and specialize in behavior interventions.

Online degrees in these areas offer convenient pathways to meaningful, in-demand careers—while balancing studies with personal or professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing David Grande

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles