World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 50 238 211 139 117 180 12682

Sarah E. Gollust publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah E. Gollust between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah E. Gollust published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2021. 27 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2021. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 19 publications
2002 2025

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah E. Gollust: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 4
2004 0
2005 5
2006 3
2007 3
2008 8
2009 7
2010 5
2011 3
2012 7
2013 11
2014 9
2015 7
2016 10
2017 22
2018 11
2019 10
2020 18
2021 26
2022 17
2023 11
2024 8
2025 19
Total 225
Download as CSV

Sarah E. Gollust publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Gollust sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 176–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 180 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29 180
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Sarah E. Gollust D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E. Gollust sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19 50
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Sarah E. Gollust is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Health Professions, with an emphasis on General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science as noted subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Media Influence and Health, Healthcare Policy and Management, Climate Change Communication and Perception, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, Milbank Quarterly, Social Science & Medicine, JAMA Network Open, and the American Journal of Public Health.

Some of Sarah E. Gollust's recent papers include:

  • The Emergence of COVID-19 in the US: A Public Health and Political Communication Crisis, 2020, Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law
  • Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: Results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • College roommates have a modest but significant influence on each other's political ideology, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Effects of Prior Exposure to Conflicting Health Information on Responses to Subsequent Unrelated Health Messages: Results from a Population-Based Longitudinal Experiment, 2021, Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Americans' perceptions of disparities in COVID-19 mortality: Results from a nationally-representative survey, 2020, Preventive Medicine

The scientist frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Erika Franklin Fowler
  • Rebekah H. Nagler
  • Jeff Niederdeppe
  • Laura Baum
  • Margaret Tait

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality Among University Students

    Daniel Eisenberg;Sarah E. Gollust;Ezra Golberstein;Jennifer L. Hefner

  • Help-seeking and access to mental health care in a university student population.

    Daniel Eisenberg;Ezra Golberstein;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Persistence of mental health problems and needs in a college student population.

    Kara Zivin;Daniel Eisenberg;Sarah E. Gollust;Ezra Golberstein

  • Perceived Stigma and Mental Health Care Seeking

    B.A. Ezra Golberstein;Daniel Eisenberg;B.A. Sarah E. Gollust

  • Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Injury among University Students.

    Sarah Elizabeth Gollust;Daniel Eisenberg;Ezra Golberstein

  • Social Stigma Toward Persons With Prescription Opioid Use Disorder: Associations With Public Support for Punitive and Public Health–Oriented Policies

    Alene Kennedy-Hendricks;Colleen L. Barry;Sarah E. Gollust;Margaret E. Ensminger

  • The Polarizing Effect of News Media Messages About the Social Determinants of Health

    Sarah E. Gollust;Paula M. Lantz;Peter A. Ubel

  • Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing.

    Sarah E. Gollust;Sara Chandros Hull;Benjamin S. Wilfond

  • Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research Participants

    S.E. Gollust;E.S. Gordon;C. Zayac;G. Griffin

  • Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy

    Sarah E. Gollust;Jeff Niederdeppe;Colleen L. Barry

  • Perceived Stigma and Mental Health Care Seeking

    Unknown

  • Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet

    Sarah E. Gollust;Benjamin S. Wilfond;Sara Chandros Hull

  • Communicating population health: print news media coverage of type 2 diabetes.

    Sarah E. Gollust;Paula M. Lantz

  • Primary care physicians’ perspectives on the prescription opioid epidemic

    Alene Kennedy-Hendricks;Susan H. Busch;Emma Elizabeth McGinty;Marcus A. Bachhuber

  • Turner syndrome: four challenges across the lifespan

    Erica J Sutton;Aideen McInerney-Leo;Carolyn A Bondy;Sarah E Gollust

  • Living with achondroplasia in an average-sized world: An assessment of quality of life

    Sarah E. Gollust;Richard E. Thompson;Holly C. Gooding;Barbara B. Biesecker

  • News Media Framing of Childhood Obesity in the United States From 2000 to 2009

    Colleen L. Barry;Marian Jarlenski;Rachel Grob;Mark Schlesinger

  • Perceived Stigma and Help-Seeking Behavior: Longitudinal Evidence From the Healthy Minds Study

    Ezra Golberstein;Daniel Eisenberg;Sarah E. Gollust

  • The Content and Effect of Politicized Health Controversies

    Erika Franklin Fowler;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Strategic Messaging to Promote Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Lessons From Recent Political Campaigns

    Judy Jou;Jeff Niederdeppe;Colleen L. Barry;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Framing Childhood Obesity: How Individualizing the Problem Affects Public Support for Prevention

    Colleen L. Barry;Victoria L. Brescoll;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Americans' opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.

    Sarah E. Gollust;Colleen L. Barry;Jeff Niederdeppe

  • Criminal Activity or Treatable Health Condition? News Media Framing of Opioid Analgesic Abuse in the United States, 1998-2012

    Emma E. McGinty;Alene Kennedy-Hendricks;Julia Baller;Jeff Niederdeppe

  • Looking Ahead: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Public Health Practice

    Nancy M. Baum;Sarah Elizabeth Gollust;Susan Dorr Goold;Peter D. Jacobson

  • Playing fair: fairness beliefs and health policy preferences in the United States.

    Julia Lynch;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Communication About Health Disparities in the Mass Media

    Jeff Niederdeppe;Cabral A. Bigman;Amy L. Gonzales;Sarah E. Gollust

  • Truth-telling and Turner Syndrome: the importance of diagnostic disclosure.

    Erica J. Sutton;Jessica Young;Aideen McInerney-Leo;Carolyn A. Bondy

Frequent Co-Authors

Erika Franklin Fowler
Erika Franklin Fowler Wesleyan University
Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Jeff Niederdeppe
Jeff Niederdeppe Cornell University
David Grande
David Grande University of Pennsylvania
Emma E. McGinty
Emma E. McGinty Cornell University
Barbara B. Biesecker
Barbara B. Biesecker RTI International
Diana J. Burgess
Diana J. Burgess United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Daniel Eisenberg
Daniel Eisenberg University of California, Los Angeles
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Political Science degrees can open doors to versatile careers both inside and outside government. Many students are now considering online education for its convenience and flexibility. If you’re interested in adding to your credentials or changing direction, certifications that pay well can quickly boost your employability. Also, accelerated options like the fastest masters degree programs allow you to upskill and advance your career in a short period of time.

Cost is always a concern—fortunately, there are quality programs among the affordable online degrees available nationwide. These options make further education accessible to more students. Political Science majors also find exciting roles in the sustainability sector. Learn more about how to become a sustainability consultant and similar green careers that are growing in demand.

Exploring related online degrees and career pathways can help you tailor your academic journey and increase your impact in today’s dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah E. Gollust

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles