World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pascal Borry

Pascal Borry

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
9893
World Ranking
2321
National Ranking
22

Pascal Borry publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Borry sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 322 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Pascal Borry D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Borry sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pascal Borry is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on ethics, genetics, and public health. Their research spans several specialized subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, genetics, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, general health professions, and physiology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Research Data Management Practices

Borry has published research frequently in several academic journals. The most common venues for their work are:

  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • Open Research Europe
  • Accountability in Research
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Several recent papers demonstrate the scope of their research interests:

  • "Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review" (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • "Toward better governance of human genomic data" (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • "Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature" (2020, Human Reproduction Update)
  • "The role of pharmacogenomics in contemporary cardiovascular therapy: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy" (2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy)
  • "Sport-related concussion research agenda beyond medical science: culture, ethics, science, policy" (2023, Journal of Medical Ethics)

Pascal Borry has worked collaboratively with several frequent co-authors including:

  • Danya F. Vears
  • Eva Van Steijvoort
  • Mahsa Shabani
  • Isabelle Huys
  • Thijs Devriendt

Best Publications

  • Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.

    Carla G van El;Martina C Cornel;Pascal Borry;Ros J Hastings

  • Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening

    Wybo Dondorp;Guido de Wert;Yvonne Bombard;Diana W Bianchi

  • The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics.

    Pascal Borry;Paul Schotsmans;Kris Dierickx

  • Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening

    Lidewij Henneman;Pascal Borry;Davit Chokoshvili;Davit Chokoshvili;Martina C Cornel

  • Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers

    Pascal Borry;Loes Stultiëns;Herman Nys;Jean-Jacques Cassiman

  • Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations

    Pascal Borry;Gerry Evers-Kiebooms;Martina C. Cornel;Angus John Clarke

  • Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics

    P Borry

  • Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

    Pascal Borry

  • Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries

    Pascal Borry;Pascal Borry;Rachel E van Hellemondt;Dominique Sprumont;Camilla Fittipaldi Duarte Jales

  • Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new EU General Data Protection Regulation

    Mahsa Shabani;Pascal Borry

  • A review of the key issues associated with the commercialization of biobanks

    Timothy Caulfield;Sarah Burningham;Yann Joly;Zubin Master

  • Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers.

    Pascal Borry;Jean-Pierre Fryns;Paul Schotsmans;Kris Dierickx

  • Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis

    Pascal Borry;Paul Schotsmans;Kris Dierickx

  • Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market

    Pascal Borry;Martina C. Cornel;Heidi C. Howard

  • Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders

    Frauke Becker;Carla G. van El;Dolores Ibarreta;Eleni Zika

  • 'Nobody tosses a dwarf!' The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined.

    Carlo Leget;Pascal Borry;Raymond De Vries

  • What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

    Pascal Borry;Paul Schotsmans;Kris Dierickx

  • Whole-genome sequencing in newborn screening? A statement on the continued importance of targeted approaches in newborn screening programmes

    Heidi Carmen Howard;Bartha Maria Knoppers;Martina C Cornel;Ellen Wright Clayton

  • Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature review

    Mahsa Shabani;Louise Bezuidenhout;Pascal Borry

  • Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumers

    Pascal Borry;Pascal Borry;Lidewij Henneman;Phillis Lakeman;Leo P. ten Kate

  • Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction : from research to clinical applications

    J C Harper;K Aittomäki;P Borry;M C Cornel

  • Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Summary and recommendations

    Wybo Dondorp;Guido de Wert;Yvonne Bombard;Diana W Bianchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Bartha Maria Knoppers
Bartha Maria Knoppers McGill University Health Centre
Anne De Paepe
Anne De Paepe Ghent University Hospital
Anne Cambon-Thomsen
Anne Cambon-Thomsen French National Centre for Scientific Research
Timothy Caulfield
Timothy Caulfield University of Alberta
Gert Matthijs
Gert Matthijs KU Leuven
Aad Tibben
Aad Tibben Leiden University
Karen Sermon
Karen Sermon Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Jane Kaye
Jane Kaye University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to flexible and rewarding careers. The rise of accredited digital programs means professionals can advance their education without leaving their current jobs or communities.

For students interested in clinical psychology, several psyd online programs now combine in-depth coursework with convenient virtual learning. Those pursuing family therapy can benefit from accelerated mft programs online, which provide a faster route to licensure.

Budget is another key consideration. Many high-quality online masters in psychology programs keep costs accessible while maintaining rigorous standards. For educators aiming to quickly enhance their qualifications, there are 2 year ed d programs online that deliver leadership-focused doctorates at an accelerated pace.

Online learning in these fields continues to grow, making it easier than ever for future social scientists and humanists to achieve their academic and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Pascal Borry

Trending Scientists