World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barbara Prainsack

Barbara Prainsack

Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
8185
World Ranking
2337
National Ranking
5

Barbara Prainsack publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Prainsack sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 226 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Barbara Prainsack D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara Prainsack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Austria Leader Award
  • 2019 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Barbara Prainsack is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, and Information Systems.

The main topics of their work include Ethics in Clinical Research, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research.

Prainsack has published frequently in several academic venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
  • Policy Studies
  • BioSocieties
  • BMJ
  • Policy Press eBooks

Among recent papers relevant to the broader field of public health and ethics are:

  • Integrating artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of radiology: challenges and recommendations (2020), published in European Radiology
  • Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings (2021), published in Frontiers in Public Health
  • Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data? (2020), published in The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation (2021), published in the Institutional Repository University of Antwerp
  • Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study (2021), published in Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent co-authors working alongside Prainsack include:

  • Hendrik Wagenaar
  • Amelia Fiske
  • Bettina Zimmermann
  • Seliem El-Sayed
  • Katharina Kieslich

Barbara Prainsack has contributed to several book publications, mainly with Policy Press, where four editions of The Pandemic Within were published in 2021. Additionally, a version of the same book was released by Bristol University Press eBooks in 2021.

Recognition for their academic work includes being named a Member of Academia Europaea in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Solidarity: Reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics

    Barbara Prainsack;Alena Buyx

  • Solidarity in Biomedicine and Beyond

    Barbara Prainsack;Alena Buyx

  • Beyond individualism: Is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research?:

    Edward S. Dove;Susan E. Kelly;Federica Lucivero;Mavis Machirori

  • Integrating artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of radiology: challenges and recommendations

    Michael P. Recht;Marc Dewey;Keith Dreyer;Curtis Langlotz

  • SOLIDARITY IN CONTEMPORARY BIOETHICS – TOWARDS A NEW APPROACH

    Barbara Prainsack;Alena Buyx

  • Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings.

    Lucia Martinelli;Vanja Kopilaš;Matjaž Vidmar;Ciara Heavin

  • The future of technologies for personalised medicine

    Alison Harvey;Angela Brand;Stephen T. Holgate;Lars V. Kristiansen

  • ‘Negotiating Life’ The Regulation of Human Cloning and Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Israel

    Barbara Prainsack

  • Personal genomes: Misdirected precaution.

    Barbara Prainsack;Jenny Reardon;Richard Alan Hindmarsh;Herbert Gottweis

  • Biobanks : governance in comparative perspective

    Herbert Gottweis;Alan Petersen

  • A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing.

    Lynn F. Cherkas;Juliette M. Harris;Elana Levinson;Tim D. Spector

  • Global Public Perceptions of Genomic Data Sharing: What Shapes the Willingness to Donate DNA and Health Data?

    Anna Middleton;Richard Milne;Mohamed A. Almarri;Shamim Anwer

  • The Use of Forensic DNA Phenotyping in Predicting Appearance and Biogeographic Ancestry.

    Peter M. Schneider;Barbara Prainsack;Manfred Kayser

  • A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks.

    Barbara Prainsack;Alena Buyx

  • The “We” in the “Me”: Solidarity and Health Care in the Era of Personalized Medicine

    Barbara Prainsack

  • A look into the future of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: an expert consultation.

    Emil Nafis Iftekhar;Viola Priesemann;Rudi Balling;Simon Bauer

  • An action plan for pan-European defence against new SARS-CoV-2 variants.

    Viola Priesemann;Rudi Balling;Melanie M Brinkmann;Sandra Ciesek

  • Logged out: Ownership, exclusion and public value in the digital data and information commons:

    Barbara Prainsack

  • Genetic Suspects : Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing

    Richard Alan Hindmarsh;Barbara Prainsack

  • Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.

    Bettina Maria Zimmermann;Amelia Fiske;Barbara Prainsack;Nora Hangel

  • Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.

    Richard Milne;Katherine I Morley;Katherine I Morley;Katherine I Morley;Heidi Carmen Howard;Emilia Niemiec

  • Enterprising or altruistic selves?:making up research subjects in genetics research

    Richard Tutton;Barbara Prainsack

  • The Prüm Regime: Situated Dis/Empowerment in Transnational DNA Profile Exchange

    Barbara Prainsack;Victor Toom

Frequent Co-Authors

Effy Vayena
Effy Vayena ETH Zurich
George P. Patrinos
George P. Patrinos University of Patras
Rudi Balling
Rudi Balling University of Bonn
Federico Innocenti
Federico Innocenti University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matjaž Perc
Matjaž Perc University of Maribor
David Neil Cooper
David Neil Cooper Cardiff University
Milan Macek
Milan Macek Charles University
Fahd Al-Mulla
Fahd Al-Mulla Kuwait University
Paolo Fortina
Paolo Fortina Thomas Jefferson University
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers a wide array of academic and professional opportunities—especially with the rise of flexible online options. Students can now choose from various specialized programs that fast-track their studies and open doors to in-demand careers.

For those interested in social work, online accelerated msw programs provide an efficient path to earning a master’s degree and entering clinical practice or leadership roles. Similarly, if you’re passionate about understanding human behavior, an accelerated psychology degree online can lead to opportunities in counseling, research, or community services.

Accreditation is key in counseling careers. Opting for cacrep accredited programs ensures your degree meets professional standards required for licensure. Those focused on family dynamics and therapy can pursue online mft programs accredited for careers in marriage and family therapy.

With these online options, you can balance your education with work or family commitments while building the skills needed for meaningful careers supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara Prainsack

Trending Scientists