World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johannes J. M. van Delden

Johannes J. M. van Delden

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 63 1193 1052 53 50 262 13374

Johannes J. M. van Delden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Johannes J. M. van Delden between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Johannes J. M. van Delden published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2019. 25 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2019. 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1964 2025

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Johannes J. M. van Delden: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 8
2005 7
2006 6
2007 8
2008 8
2009 13
2010 9
2011 15
2012 20
2013 15
2014 20
2015 20
2016 23
2017 15
2018 20
2019 37
2020 18
2021 13
2022 17
2023 14
2024 14
2025 11
Total 348
Download as CSV

Johannes J. M. van Delden publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes J. M. van Delden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 254–263 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 262 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162 262
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Johannes J. M. van Delden D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes J. M. van Delden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77 63
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Johannes J. M. van Delden is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has published extensively in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and general health professions. Their research intersects a range of subfields, including economics, econometrics, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work explores several core topics in medicine and bioethics. Central themes include:

  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Ethics in Medical Practice

Van Delden has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed publications, with research appearing prominently in venues such as BMC Medical Ethics, The American Journal of Bioethics, Supportive Care in Cancer, Palliative Medicine, and BMC Palliative Care.

Frequent co-authors in van Delden's work include Agnes van der Heide, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel, Judith Rietjens, Rieke van der Graaf, and Guido Miccinesi, indicating collaborative efforts within ethical and medical research communities.

Among notable recent publications are:

  • "Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial" (2020), published in PLoS Medicine
  • "The social licence for data-intensive health research: towards co-creation, public value and trust" (2021), published in BMC Medical Ethics
  • "Should we deny ICU admission to the elderly? Ethical considerations in times of COVID-19" (2020), published in Critical Care
  • "Changing Practices in the Use of Continuous Sedation at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature" (2020), published in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
  • "Health-related quality of life and symptoms of conservative care versus dialysis in patients with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review" (2020), published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Best Publications

  • Definition and recommendations for advance care planning : an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care

    Judith A C Rietjens;Rebecca L Sudore;Rebecca L Sudore;Michael Connolly;Johannes J van Delden

  • End-of-Life Practices in the Netherlands under the Euthanasia Act

    Agnes van der Heide;Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen;Mette L. Rurup;Hilde M. Buiting

  • Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Henrike J Schouten;G J Geersing;H L Koek;Nicolaas P A Zuithoff

  • Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: a repeated cross-sectional survey

    Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen;Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg;Corine Penning;Gwen J F de Jong-Krul

  • Revised CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans.

    Johannes J. M. van Delden;Rieke van der Graaf

  • Comparative Survival among Older Adults with Advanced Kidney Disease Managed Conservatively Versus with Dialysis

    Wouter R. Verberne;A.B.M. Tom Geers;Wilbert T. Jellema;Hieronymus H. Vincent

  • Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence

    Shona Kalkman;Shona Kalkman;Johannes van Delden;Johannes van Delden;Amitava Banerjee;Benoît Tyl

  • Narrative medicine as a medical education tool: A systematic review.

    M. M. Milota;G. J. M. W. van Thiel;J. J. M. van Delden

  • Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study

    Judith Rietjens;Johannes van Delden;Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen;Hilde Buiting

  • Being there: parenting the child with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Marijke C Kars;Mia S H Duijnstee;Aart Pool;Johannes J M van Delden

  • Two Decades of Research on Euthanasia from the Netherlands. What Have We Learnt and What Questions Remain

    Judith A. C. Rietjens;Paul J. van der Maas;Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen;Johannes J. M. van Delden

  • Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.

    Menno Mostert;Annelien L Bredenoord;Monique C I H Biesaart;Johannes J M van Delden

  • Terminal sedation and euthanasia: a comparison of clinical practices.

    Judith A. C. Rietjens;Johannes J. M. van Delden;Agnes van der Heide;Astrid M. Vrakking

  • Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy

    Annelien L. Bredenoord;N. Charlotte Onland‐Moret;Johannes J.M. Van Delden

  • The ethics of mandatory vaccination against influenza for health care workers.

    J.J.M. van Delden;R. Ashcroft;A. Dawson;G. Marckmann

  • Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms

    Shona Kalkman;Menno Mostert;Christoph Gerlinger;Christoph Gerlinger;Johannes J. M. van Delden

  • Forgoing treatment at the end of life in 6 European countries

    Georg Bosshard;Tore Nilstun;Johan Bilsen;Michael Norup

  • Advance care planning for patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review of preferences and practices

    Lea J Jabbarian;Marieke Zwakman;Agnes van der Heide;Marijke C Kars

  • Advance care planning in patients with advanced cancer: A 6-country, cluster-randomised clinical trial.

    Ida J. Korfage;Giulia Carreras;Caroline M. Arnfeldt Christensen;Caroline M. Arnfeldt Christensen;Pascalle Billekens

  • Opinions of health care professionals and the public after eight years of euthanasia legislation in the Netherlands: A mixed methods approach

    Pauline S. C. Kouwenhoven;Natasja J. H. Raijmakers;Johannes J. M. van Delden;Judith A. C. Rietjens

  • End-of-life decision-making in Canada: the report by the Royal Society of Canada expert panel on end-of-life decision-making

    Udo Schüklenk;Johannes J. M. Van Delden;Jocelyn Downie;Sheila A. M. Mclean

  • The implications of today's family structures for support giving to older parents

    Maria C. Stuifbergen;Johannes J.M. van Delden;Pearl A. Dykstra

  • Which determinants should be targeted to increase influenza vaccination uptake among health care workers in nursing homes

    I Looijmans-van den Akker;J J M van Delden;Th J M Verheij;G A van Essen

Frequent Co-Authors

Karel G.M. Moons
Karel G.M. Moons Utrecht University
Diederick E. Grobbee
Diederick E. Grobbee Utrecht University
Luc Deliens
Luc Deliens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Eelko Hak
Eelko Hak University of Groningen
Sheila Payne
Sheila Payne Lancaster University
Wouter J.A. Dhert
Wouter J.A. Dhert Utrecht University
Martha A. Grootenhuis
Martha A. Grootenhuis University of Amsterdam
Ross E. G. Upshur
Ross E. G. Upshur University of Toronto
Caspar W. N. Looman
Caspar W. N. Looman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pearl A. Dykstra
Pearl A. Dykstra Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Social Sciences and Humanities students have diverse online education options, many leading directly to meaningful careers. Mental health fields are especially popular, with programs designed to be flexible, affordable, and fast.

For those seeking advanced psychological practice, psy d programs offer a strong pathway into clinical, counseling, or research positions. If your interest lies in supporting couples and families, consider online masters mft programs for a focused, time-efficient route to licensure.

Exploring the broader field of psychology? getting a masters in psychology can open doors to roles in organizational leadership, academia, and human services. Many programs are designed for both recent graduates and working professionals, letting you balance study with other commitments.

Those interested in education leadership or policy may want to consider the fastest edd program online options. These degrees help prepare you for administrative, academic, or consulting roles within educational institutions.

Online learning in the Social Sciences and Humanities gives you flexibility and access to respected credentials, supporting both traditional and emerging career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes J. M. van Delden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles