World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martha A. Grootenhuis

Martha A. Grootenhuis

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
21871
World Ranking
14763
National Ranking
566

Martha A. Grootenhuis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha A. Grootenhuis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 396 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martha A. Grootenhuis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha A. Grootenhuis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martha A. Grootenhuis is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the medical field, with particular emphasis on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health. Additional interdisciplinary efforts include sociology and political science, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, and speech and hearing.

The main topics covered in their research encompass childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, family support in illness, acute lymphoblastic leukemia research, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, family and disability support research, palliative care and end-of-life issues, and cancer survivorship and care.

Among the most frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • Supportive Care in Cancer
  • Psycho-Oncology
  • Quality of Life Research
  • Cancer

Frequent co-authors of Grootenhuis include:

  • Wim J. E. Tissing
  • Heleen Maurice-Stam
  • Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
  • Raphaële R. L. van Litsenburg
  • Helena J. H. van der Pal

Recent papers authored by Grootenhuis cover a range of topics related to childhood cancer and patient well-being:

  • "Psychological Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Neurocognitive Functioning in Survivors of Childhood Cancer and Their Parents" (2020), published in Pediatric Clinics of North America
  • "A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)" (2020), published in Quality of Life Research
  • "No increase in psychosocial stress of Dutch children with cancer and their caregivers during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • "Prevalence and risk factors of cancer-related fatigue in childhood cancer survivors: A DCCSS LATER study" (2021), published in Cancer
  • "A joint international consensus statement for measuring quality of survival for patients with childhood cancer" (2023), published in Nature Medicine

Best Publications

  • Definitions and Measurement of Chronic Health Conditions in Childhood: A Systematic Review

    Johanna H. van der Lee;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Martha A. Grootenhuis;Hugo S. Heymans

  • Quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer

    N E Langeveld;H Stam;M A Grootenhuis

  • Young adult patients with a history of pediatric disease: Impact on course of life and transition into adulthood

    Heleen Stam;Esther E. Hartman;Esther E. Hartman;Jacqueline A. Deurloo;Jaap Groothoff

  • Adjustment and coping by parents of children with cancer: a review of the literature

    M. A. Grootenhuis

  • Healthy play, better coping : The importance of play for the development of children in health and disease

    Sanne L. Nijhof;Christiaan H. Vinkers;Stefan M. van Geelen;Sasja N. Duijff

  • Quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

    N.E. Langeveld;M.A. Grootenhuis;P.A. Voûte;R.J. de Haan

  • The course of life of survivors of childhood cancer.

    H. Stam;M.A. Grootenhuis

  • Educational achievement, employment and living situation in long-term young adult survivors of childhood cancer in the Netherlands.

    N.E. Langeveld;M.C. Ubbink;M.A. Grootenhuis

  • Defining chronic diseases and health conditions in childhood (0-18 years of age): national consensus in the Netherlands

    Lidwine B. Mokkink;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Johanna H. van der Lee;Martha A. Grootenhuis;Martin Offringa

  • Psychosocial Assessment as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Cancer.

    Anne E. Kazak;Anne E. Kazak;Annah N. Abrams;Jaime Banks;Jennifer Christofferson

  • Hidden Consequences of Success in Pediatrics: Parental Health-Related Quality of Life—Results From the Care Project

    Janneke Hatzmann;Hugo S A Heymans;Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell;Bernard M S van Praag

  • Coping and Family Functioning Predict Longitudinal Psychological Adaptation of Siblings of Childhood Cancer Patients

    Bregje A. Houtzager;Frans J. Oort;Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers;Huib N. Caron

  • Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice.

    Maria J. Santana;Lotte Haverman;Kate Absolom;Elena Takeuchi

  • Adjustment of siblings to childhood cancer: a literature review

    B. A. Houtzager;M. A. Grootenhuis

  • Predictors of parental emotional adjustment to childhood cancer

    Martha A. Grootenhuis

  • Quality of life and psychological adaptation in siblings of paediatric cancer patients, 2 years after diagnosis.

    B.A. Houtzager;M.A. Grootenhuis;H.N. Caron

  • Coping Strategies and Quality of Life of Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    H J van der Zaag-Loonen;M A Grootenhuis;H H F Derkx

  • Health related quality of life of Dutch children: psychometric properties of the PedsQL in the Netherlands

    Vivian Engelen;Marleen M Haentjens;Symone B Detmar;Hendrik M Koopman

  • Neurocognitive consequences of a paediatric brain tumour and its treatment: a meta-analysis.

    Marieke A De Ruiter;Rosa Van Mourik;Antoinette Y N Schouten-Van Meeteren;Martha A Grootenhuis

  • Definitions and Measurement of Chronic Health Conditions in Childhood

    Johanna H. van der Lee;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Martha A. Grootenhuis;Hugo S. Heymans

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap Oosterlaan
Jaap Oosterlaan University of Amsterdam
Marc A. Benninga
Marc A. Benninga University of Amsterdam
Frits A. Wijburg
Frits A. Wijburg University of Amsterdam
Carlo Schuengel
Carlo Schuengel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink University Medical Center Utrecht
Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers
Josette E. H. M. Hoekstra-Weebers University Medical Center Groningen
Frans J. Oort
Frans J. Oort University of Amsterdam
Claire E. Wakefield
Claire E. Wakefield University of New South Wales
Esther Hartman
Esther Hartman University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine opens the door to a range of online degree options and related pathways. Many students interested in healthcare start with foundational programs, such as an online bachelor's degree in nutrition, which combines science-based coursework with practical skills and can lead to roles in dietetics, public health, or clinical support.

For those pursuing healthcare administration, top online mha programs that are cahme accredited offer advanced training in leadership and organizational management, ensuring high academic standards and strong career prospects in hospital or practice management.

Registered Nurses (RNs) can accelerate their careers by enrolling in rn to bsn no clinical hours programs. These programs are ideal for working professionals seeking advancement while maintaining flexibility and avoiding additional clinical requirements.

For nurses aiming for the highest levels of practice, the fastest dnp online program provides a pathway to leadership, advocacy, and clinical expertise. These accelerated programs allow practitioners to complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently, supporting career growth in advanced healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing Martha A. Grootenhuis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles