World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
8564
World Ranking
6761
National Ranking
304

Max Debussche publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Debussche sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 68 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Max Debussche D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Debussche sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Max Debussche is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their academic profile is centered on scientific research within this institution.

Their bibliography does not currently list recent papers, frequent co-authors, or a record of publication in specific venues. Additionally, there is no available detailed data regarding book publications or awards received.

There is no specific information regarding Max Debussche's main fields of study, subfields, or core research topics. Consequently, there is no detailed breakdown of research areas or topics associated with their work at this time.

Despite the limited public record, Max Debussche remains an active member of the CNRS, contributing through their role in this national research organization in France.

Best Publications

  • PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION

    Eric Garnier;Jacques Cortez;Georges Billès;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Biological invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin.

    F. di Castri;A. J. Hansen;M. Debussche

  • The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs

    Sébastien Lavergne;John D. Thompson;Eric Garnier;Max Debussche

  • MEDITERRANEAN LANDSCAPE CHANGES : EVIDENCE FROM OLD POSTCARDS

    Max Debussche;Jacques Lepart;Alain Dervieux

  • Fleshy fruit characters and the choices of bird and mammal seed dispersers in a Mediterranean region

    Max Debussche;Paul Isenmann

  • Rural depopulation and recent landscape changes in a Mediterranean region: Consequences to the breeding avifauna

    Eric Preiss;Jean-Louis Martin;Max Debussche

  • Bird-dispersed seed rain and seedling establishment in patchy Mediterranean vegetation

    Unknown

  • Assessing Why Two Introduced Conyza Differ in Their Ability to Invade Mediterranean Old Fields

    Christophe Thebaud;Adrien C. Finzi;Laurence Affre;Max Debussche

  • Changes in Mediterranean plant succession: old-fields revisited

    Max Debussche;José Escarré;Jacques Lepart;Claudie Houssard

  • Environmental and human factors influencing rare plant local occurrence, extinction and persistence: a 115‐year study in the Mediterranean region

    Sébastien Lavergne;Wilfried Thuiller;James Molina;Max Debussche

  • Ornithochory and plant succession in mediterranean abandoned orchards

    M. Debussche;J. Escarré;J. Lepart

  • Small scale disturbances and the maintenance of species diversity in Mediterranean old fields

    Sandra Lavorel;Jacques Lepart;Max Debussche;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

  • Rapid invasion of Fraxinus ornus L. along the Herault River system in southern France: the importance of seed dispersal by water

    Christophe Thebaud;Max Debussche

  • Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria

    Perrine Gauthier;Max Debussche;John D. Thompson

  • Do rock endemic and widespread plant species differ under the Leaf–Height–Seed plant ecology strategy scheme?

    Sébastien Lavergne;Eric Garnier;Max Debussche

  • Plant traits, litter quality and decomposition in a Mediterranean old-field succession

    Jacques Cortez;Eric Garnier;Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy;Max Debussche

  • Establishment of woody plants in Mediterranean old fields: opportunity in space and time

    Max Debussche;Jacques Lepart

  • Ecological differentiation of Mediterranean endemic plants

    John D. Thompson;Sébastien Lavergne;Laurence Affre;Myriam Gaudeul

  • Human impact on landscape patterning: Mediterranean examples.

    Jacques Lepart;Max Debussche

  • Fingerprints of environmental change on the rare mediterranean flora: a 115-year study

    Sébastien Lavergne;James Molina;Max Debussche

  • Seed dispersal and germination patternsin a rare Mediterranean island endemic ( Anchusa crispa Viv., Boraginaceae)

    Angélique Quilichini;Angélique Quilichini;Max Debussche

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Thompson
John D. Thompson Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jacques Lepart
Jacques Lepart Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Sébastien Lavergne
Sébastien Lavergne Grenoble Alpes University
Eric Garnier
Eric Garnier University of Montpellier
Sandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel Grenoble Alpes University
Jean-Dominique Lebreton
Jean-Dominique Lebreton Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Christophe Thébaud
Christophe Thébaud Paul Sabatier University
Aurélien Besnard
Aurélien Besnard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Louis Martin
Jean-Louis Martin Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Catherine Roumet
Catherine Roumet University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Ecology and Evolution opens diverse avenues for advanced study and specialization. Many students opt for flexible programs that allow them to pursue their passion for science while maintaining work or family commitments.

Those with nursing backgrounds sometimes transition into research or environmental policy roles, with online bsn to msn programs offering a strong foundation in analytical and leadership skills. Similarly, professionals interested in conservation, advocacy, or community outreach may pursue msw online programs to develop expertise in social work with a scientific edge.

It’s important to consider the quality and reputation of your chosen institution. Many students seek out a non profit university to ensure transparency, accreditation, and value. In addition, a growing number of individuals from military backgrounds are selecting an online college for military community to best serve their unique needs while advancing their career in the sciences.

By choosing the right online pathway, you can shape a rewarding career in Ecology, Evolution, or a related field, all while balancing your personal and professional responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Max Debussche

Trending Scientists