World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marie-Laure Navas

Marie-Laure Navas

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
27158
World Ranking
5411
National Ranking
239

Marie-Laure Navas publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Laure Navas sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marie-Laure Navas D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie-Laure Navas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marie-Laure Navas is affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with specific emphasis on ecological modeling, ecology, and nature and landscape conservation.

Their recent publication record includes a paper titled "Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France" published in 2023 in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence. This paper has been cited three times.

Marie-Laure Navas's work covers core topics such as:

  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The scientist frequently collaborates with multiple co-authors, including:

  • Thibaut Couturier
  • Sarah Bauduin
  • Guillelme Astruc
  • Aurélie Blanck
  • Coline Canonne

Their contributions are mainly published in the journal Ecological Solutions and Evidence, reflecting a focus on ecological applied research.

Best Publications

  • The worldwide leaf economics spectrum

    Ian J. Wright;Peter B. Reich;Mark Westoby;David D. Ackerly

  • Let the concept of trait be functional

    Cyrille Violle;Marie-Laure Navas;Denis Vile;Elena Kazakou

  • PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION

    Eric Garnier;Jacques Cortez;Georges Billès;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants

    Katharine N. Suding;Sandra Lavorel;F. S. Chapin;Johannes H. Cornelissen

  • Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2 : on winners, losers and functional groups.

    Hendrik Poorter;Marie-Laure Navas;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Specific Leaf Area and dry Matter Content Estimate thickness in Laminar Leaves

    Denis Vile;Éric Garnier;Bill Shipley;Gérard Laurent

  • A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review

    Eric Garnier;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits

    E. Garnier;G. Laurent;A. Bellmann;S. Debain

  • Plant Functional Diversity: Organism traits, community structure, and ecosystem properties

    Eric Garnier;Marie-Laure Navas;Karl Grigulis

  • Community assembly along a soil depth gradient: contrasting patterns of plant trait convergence and divergence in a Mediterranean rangeland

    Maud Bernard-Verdier;Marie-Laure Navas;Marie-Laure Navas;Mark Vellend;Cyrille Violle

  • Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design.

    Sabrina Gaba;Françoise Lescourret;Simon Boudsocq;Jérôme Enjalbert

  • Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities

    Cyrille Violle;Eric Garnier;Jérémie Lecoeur;Catherine Roumet

  • Are trait‐based species rankings consistent across data sets and spatial scales?

    Elena Kazakou;Cyrille Violle;Catherine Roumet;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Agroecological weed control using a functional approach: a review of cropping systems diversity

    Sabrina Gaba;Guillaume Fried;Elena Kazakou;Bruno Chauvel

  • Leaf life span, dynamics and construction cost of species from Mediterranean old‐fields differing in successional status

    Marie‐Laure Navas;Béatrice Ducout;Catherine Roumet;Jean Richarte

  • A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: how to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures?

    Eric Garnier;Marie-Laure Navas;Michael P. Austin;Julianne M. Lilley

  • Suites of plant traits in species from different stages of a Mediterranean secondary succession.

    M.‐L. Navas;C. Roumet;A. Bellmann;G. Laurent

  • Plasticity of whole plant and leaf traits in Rubia peregrina in response to light, nutrient and water availability

    Marie-Laure Navas;Eric Garnier

  • Plant traits related to competition: how do they shape the functional diversity of communities?

    Marie-Laure Navas;Cyrille Violle

  • Quantifying relationships between traits and explicitly measured gradients of stress and disturbance in early successional plant communities

    Grégory Sonnier;Grégory Sonnier;Bill Shipley;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Using plant population biology in weed research : a strategy to improve weed management

    M.-L. Navas

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Garnier
Eric Garnier University of Montpellier
Catherine Roumet
Catherine Roumet University of Montpellier
Cyrille Violle
Cyrille Violle Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Hendrik Poorter
Hendrik Poorter Forschungszentrum Jülich
Bill Shipley
Bill Shipley Université de Sherbrooke
Jacek Oleksyn
Jacek Oleksyn Polish Academy of Sciences
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Sandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz National University of Córdoba
Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright Western Sydney University
Jacques Roy
Jacques Roy Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse academic and professional opportunities, many available through flexible online programs. For example, those interested in communication, behavior, or science education often pursue degrees in allied fields online.

If you're inclined toward healthcare and communication sciences, consider asha accredited slp programs, which deliver quality instruction and meet rigorous industry standards. For those coming from unrelated majors, slp bridge programs can help you transition into a rewarding Speech-Language Pathology career.

Science-focused students interested in healthcare roles might also look into online absn programs for non nurses, which offer a fast track into nursing for those with prior bachelor’s degrees. Further specialization—such as in mental health care—can lead to lucrative practices. You can discover more about career prospects and earnings for advanced roles by checking psychiatric nurse practitioner salary information by state.

Whether you want to apply your Ecology and Evolution background directly or pivot into an allied health or education career, online degrees provide both flexibility and accessibility for your next academic step.

Best Scientists Citing Marie-Laure Navas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles