World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 90 271 253 26 24 155 74858

Hendrik Poorter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hendrik Poorter between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hendrik Poorter published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2021. 6 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2021. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hendrik Poorter: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 4
1991 2
1992 5
1993 2
1994 3
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 6
1999 2
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 5
2006 5
2007 3
2008 4
2009 7
2010 4
2011 4
2012 8
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 10
2017 9
2018 3
2019 8
2020 4
2021 11
2022 10
2023 6
2024 4
2025 2
Total 175
Download as CSV

Hendrik Poorter publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrik Poorter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–155 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 155 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147 155
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Hendrik Poorter D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrik Poorter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18 90
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Photosynthesis

Hendrik Poorter mainly investigates Botany, Specific leaf area, Ecology, Photosynthesis and Relative growth rate. The study of Botany is intertwined with the study of Horticulture in a number of ways. The concepts of his Specific leaf area study are interwoven with issues in Biomass and Habitat.

Vegetation and Range are the subjects of his Ecology studies. In general Photosynthesis, his work in Photosynthetic capacity is often linked to Form and function linking many areas of study. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Relative growth rate, concentrating on Nutrient and frequently concerns with Shoot.

His most cited work include:

  • The worldwide leaf economics spectrum (4498 citations)
  • A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide (2451 citations)
  • New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide (1676 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Ecology, Agronomy, Photosynthesis and Relative growth rate. His work deals with themes such as Biomass, Nutrient and Horticulture, which intersect with Botany. His study in Ecosystem, Range, Vegetation, Plant functional type and Biosphere is done as part of Ecology.

As part of the same scientific family, he usually focuses on Ecosystem, concentrating on Environmental change and intersecting with Plant ecology. His work investigates the relationship between Agronomy and topics such as Competition that intersect with problems in Phenotypic plasticity. His study looks at the relationship between Photosynthesis and topics such as Interspecific competition, which overlap with Herbaceous plant.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (38.99%)
  • Ecology (27.67%)
  • Agronomy (27.04%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Agronomy (27.04%)
  • Ecology (27.67%)
  • Ecosystem (13.21%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Agronomy, Ecology, Ecosystem, Root and Biome. The study incorporates disciplines such as Biomass, Nutrient, Competition and Allometry in addition to Agronomy. His Nutrient research incorporates themes from Statistics and Soil volume.

His work on Evergreen, Deciduous and Biomass as part of general Ecology research is often related to Context and Thesaurus, thus linking different fields of science. In Ecosystem, he works on issues like Environmental change, which are connected to Tundra, Global warming and Vegetation. He performs multidisciplinary study in the fields of White paper and Botany via his papers.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome (185 citations)
  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome (185 citations)
  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access (179 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Hendrik Poorter mainly focuses on Ecology, Ecosystem, Photosynthesis, Agronomy and Identification. In his research on the topic of Ecosystem, Global warming, Vegetation, Biome, Plant community and Tundra is strongly related with Environmental change. His Photosynthesis study incorporates themes from Acclimatization and Shade tolerance.

His Agronomy research includes elements of Biomass and Soil water, Soil respiration. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Photosynthetic capacity, Evergreen, Specific leaf area, Deciduous, Macroecology and Range is strongly linked to Plant anatomy. Evergreen is a subfield of Botany that he studies.

Best Publications

  • The worldwide leaf economics spectrum

    Ian J. Wright;Peter B. Reich;Mark Westoby;David D. Ackerly

  • A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    J. H. C. Cornelissen;S. Lavorel;E. Garnier;S. Diaz

  • New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    N. Pérez-Harguindeguy;S. Díaz;E. Garnier;S. Lavorel

  • Corrigendum to: New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide

    N. Pérez-Harguindeguy;S. Díaz;E. Garnier;S. Lavorel

  • Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control

    Hendrik Poorter;Karl J. Niklas;Peter B. Reich;Peter B. Reich;Jacek Oleksyn;Jacek Oleksyn

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function

    Sandra Myrna Díaz;Jens Kattge;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Ian J. Wright

  • Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis.

    Hendrik Poorter;Ülo Niinemets;Lourens Poorter;Ian J. Wright

  • TRY - a global database of plant traits

    J. Kattge;S. Díaz;S. Lavorel;I. C. Prentice

  • Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences

    Hans Lambers;Hendrik Poorter

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships

    Ian J. Wright;Peter B. Reich;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Daniel S. Falster

  • The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review

    Hendrik Poorter;Oscar Nagel

  • Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain

    John Evans;H Poorter

  • Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate.

    Hendrik Poorter;Carlo Remkes

  • INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN THE GROWTH-RESPONSE OF PLANTS TO AN ELEVATED AMBIENT CO2 CONCENTRATION

    Hendrik Poorter

  • The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change

    Fernando Valladares;Fernando Valladares;Silvia Matesanz;Francois Guilhaumon;Francois Guilhaumon;Miguel B. Araujo;Miguel B. Araujo;Miguel B. Araujo

  • Blue light dose–responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of Cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light

    Sander W. Hogewoning;Govert Trouwborst;Hans Maljaars;Hendrik Poorter

  • Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate

    Ian J. Wright;Peter B. Reich;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Daniel S. Falster

  • Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition

    Georges Kunstler;Georges Kunstler;Daniel Falster;David A. Coomes;Francis Hui

  • Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate.

    William A. Hoffmann;Hendrik Poorter

  • Carbon and nitrogen economy of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate.

    Hendrik Poorter;Carlo Remkes;Hans Lambers

  • Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area

    Hendrik Poorter;John R. Evans

  • Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2 : on winners, losers and functional groups.

    Hendrik Poorter;Marie-Laure Navas;Marie-Laure Navas

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome

    Anne D. Bjorkman;Anne D. Bjorkman;Isla H. Myers-Smith;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Signe Normand

  • Specific Leaf Area and dry Matter Content Estimate thickness in Laminar Leaves

    Denis Vile;Éric Garnier;Bill Shipley;Gérard Laurent

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright Western Sydney University
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences
Eric Garnier
Eric Garnier University of Montpellier
Hans Lambers
Hans Lambers University of Western Australia
Jacek Oleksyn
Jacek Oleksyn Polish Academy of Sciences
Lawren Sack
Lawren Sack University of California, Los Angeles
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen
Johannes H. C. Cornelissen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jens Kattge
Jens Kattge Max Planck Society
Mark Westoby
Mark Westoby Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Hendrik Poorter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles