World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
16972
World Ranking
2152
National Ranking
60

Marco Moretti publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Moretti sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 205 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marco Moretti D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Moretti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Moretti is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the field of engineering, with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering, aerospace engineering, computer networks and communications, atomic and molecular physics and optics, and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics including advanced wireless communication technologies, orbital angular momentum in optics, advanced MIMO systems optimization, optical wireless communication technologies, IoT and edge/fog computing, satellite communication systems, and antenna design and analysis.

Marco Moretti has contributed to numerous publications in prominent venues. Frequent publication outlets include arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, and IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

Some recent papers authored by or involving Moretti include:

  • A Promising Technology for 6G Wireless Networks: Intelligent Reflecting Surface (2021), Journal of Communications and Information Networks
  • Satellite Edge Computing for Real-Time and Very-High Resolution Earth Observation (2023), IEEE Transactions on Communications
  • Joint Spatial Division and Coaxial Multiplexing for Downlink Multi-User OAM Wireless Backhaul (2021), IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
  • Edge Computing and Communication for Energy-Efficient Earth Surveillance with LEO Satellites (2022), 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)
  • AoA Estimation for OAM Communication Systems With Mode-Frequency Multi-Time ESPRIT Method (2021), IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Marco Moretti frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include Wen-Xuan Long, Rui Chen, Andrea Abrardo, Jiandong Li, and Fabio Saggese.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites

    Miquel De Cáceres;Pierre Legendre;Marco Moretti

  • Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment

    P. James;K. Tzoulas;M. D. Adams;A. Barber

  • Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms

    Marie Vandewalle;Marie Vandewalle;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Matty P. Berg;Thomas Bolger

  • CWM and Rao's quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology

    Carlo Ricotta;Marco Moretti

  • Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits

    Marco Moretti;André T. C. Dias;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Florian Altermatt;Florian Altermatt

  • Exotic invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) negatively affect native plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats.

    Esther Gerber;Christine Krebs;Craig Murrell;Marco Moretti

  • Research trends in ecosystem services provided by insects

    Jorge Ari Noriega;Joaquín Hortal;Joaquín Hortal;Francisco M. Azcárate;Matty P. Berg

  • Measuring the functional redundancy of biological communities: a quantitative guide

    Carlo Ricotta;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello;Marco Moretti;Marco Caccianiga

  • A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services.

    Sandra Lavorel;Jonathan Storkey;Richard D. Bardgett;Francesco de Bello

  • Habitat connectivity shapes urban arthropod communities: the key role of green roofs.

    S. Braaker;J. Ghazoul;M. K. Obrist;M. Moretti

  • Arthropod biodiversity after forest fires: winners and losers in the winter fire regime of the southern Alps

    Marco Moretti;Martin K. Obrist;Peter Duelli

  • Agricultural policies exacerbate honeybee pollination service supply-demand mismatches across Europe.

    Tom D. Breeze;Bernard E. Vaissière;Riccardo Bommarco;Theodora Petanidou

  • The global spectrum of plant form and function: enhanced species-level trait dataset

    Unknown

  • Impacts of urbanisation on biodiversity: the role of species mobility, degree of specialisation and spatial scale

    Elena D. Concepción;Marco Moretti;Florian Altermatt;Florian Altermatt;Michael P. Nobis

  • Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions

    Carsten F. Dormann;Maria Bobrowski;D. Matthias Dehling;David J. Harris

  • Orbital Angular Momentum Waves: Generation, Detection, and Emerging Applications

    Rui Chen;Hong Zhou;Marco Moretti;Xiaodong Wang

  • Biodiversity and resilience of arthropod communities after fire disturbance in temperate forests.

    Marco Moretti;Peter Duelli;Martin K. Obrist

  • How to manage the urban green to improve bird diversity and community structure

    Simone Fontana;Simone Fontana;Thomas Sattler;Thomas Sattler;Fabio Bontadina;Marco Moretti

  • sPlot – A new tool for global vegetation analyses

    Helge Bruelheide;Jürgen Dengler;Jürgen Dengler;Borja Jiménez-Alfaro;Borja Jiménez-Alfaro;Oliver Purschke

  • Taxonomical vs. functional responses of bee communities to fire in two contrasting climatic regions.

    Marco Moretti;Francesco De Bello;Stuart P. M. Roberts;Simon G. Potts

  • SPECIAL FEATURE: FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY A novel framework for linking functional diversity of plants with other trophic levels for the quantification of ecosystem services

    Sandra Lavorel;Jonathan Storkey;Richard D. Bardgett;Francesco de Bello

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco de Bello
Francesco de Bello Spanish National Research Council
Matty P. Berg
Matty P. Berg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Lars Götzenberger
Lars Götzenberger Czech Academy of Sciences
Carlos P. Carmona
Carlos P. Carmona University of Tartu
Sandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel Grenoble Alpes University
Marco Conedera
Marco Conedera Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Raphaël Arlettaz
Raphaël Arlettaz University of Bern
Carlo Ricotta
Carlo Ricotta Sapienza University of Rome
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Ecology and Evolution, pursuing an online degree can open doors to diverse career pathways. Nowadays, various accredited programs exist that blend flexibility, quality, and affordability, making it easier to build a strong foundation in related fields or pivot to interdisciplinary graduates studies.

Many students consider healthcare-focused routes—for example, some explore online direct entry MSN programs, which allow graduates in science disciplines to quickly transition into nursing careers. When comparing degree options, resources like wgu vs chamberlain can help you weigh institutions and programs side-by-side, ensuring you choose a pathway that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Cost is another key factor. If you’re seeking affordable routes through advanced nursing degrees, check the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to keep your education investment manageable. Above all, focus on programs offered by not for profit online colleges to ensure academic rigor and accreditation. Selecting the right online pathway can lead to rewarding roles in research, education, conservation, or healthcare, directly applying your expertise in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Moretti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles