World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
60
Citations
12038
World Ranking
2311
National Ranking
62

Marco Conedera publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Conedera sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 265 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Marco Conedera D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Conedera sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Conedera is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a strong emphasis on global and planetary change, plant science, and nature and landscape conservation.

Their work addresses various subfields including atmospheric science and ecology, contributing to understanding ecological processes and ecosystem dynamics. The main topics in their research cover fire effects on ecosystems, horticultural and viticultural research, as well as tree-ring climate responses, with additional focus on ecology and vegetation dynamics, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, and plant and fungal interactions.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Marco Conedera span multiple years and significant journals. Those include:

  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Assessing changes in global fire regimes, 2024, Fire Ecology
  • A critical assessment of human-impact indices based on anthropogenic pollen indicators, 2020, Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Lightning-caused fires in the Alps: Identifying the igniting strokes, 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • How future-proof is Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in a global change context?, 2021, Forest Ecology and Management

Marco Conedera has collaborated frequently with several co-authors in their field, including:

  • Gianni Boris Pezzatti
  • Patrik Krebs
  • Willy Tinner
  • Maria Chiara Manetti
  • Attilio Rizzoli

Their publications have appeared in several scientific venues with repeated contributions to:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Reconstructing past fire regimes: methods, applications, and relevance to fire management and conservation

    Marco Conedera;Willy Tinner;Christophe Neff;Manfred Meurer

  • Long-term forest fire ecology and dynamics in southern Switzerland

    Willy Tinner;Priska Hubschmid;Michael Wehrli;Brigitta Ammann

  • The cultivation of Castanea sativa (Mill.) in Europe, from its origin to its diffusion on a continental scale

    M. Conedera;P. Krebs;Willy Tinner;M. Pradella

  • Pollen and charcoal in lake sediments compared with historically documented forest fires in southern Switzerland since AD 1920

    Willy Tinner;Marco Conedera;Brigitta Ammann;Heinz W. Gaggeler

  • Fire ecology north and south of the Alps since the last ice age

    Willy Tinner;Marco Conedera;Brigitta Ammann;Andre F. Lotter

  • Inter-annual and decadal changes in teleconnections drive continental-scale synchronization of tree reproduction

    Davide Ascoli;Giorgio Vacchiano;Marco Turco;Marco Conedera

  • Climatic change and contemporaneous land-use phases north and south of the Alps 2300 BC to 800 AD

    Willy Tinner;André F. Lotter;Brigitta Ammann;Marco Conedera

  • The past ecology of Abies alba provides new perspectives on future responses of silver fir forests to global warming

    Willy Tinner;Willy Tinner;Willy Tinner;Danielle Colombaroli;Danielle Colombaroli;Olivier Heiri;Olivier Heiri;Paul D. Henne;Paul D. Henne;Paul D. Henne

  • Correcting non-linearity and slope effects in the estimation of the leaf area index of forests from hemispherical photographs

    Patrick Schleppi;Marco Conedera;Isabella Sedivy;Anne Thimonier

  • Quaternary refugia of the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): an extended palynological approach

    Patrik Krebs;Marco Conedera;Marco Pradella;Damiano Torriani

  • European atlas of forest tree species

    Jesús San-Miguel-Ayanz;Daniele de Rigo;Giovanni Caudullo;Tracy Houston Durrant

  • Fire regime: history and definition of a key concept in disturbance ecology

    Patrik Krebs;Gianni Boris Pezzatti;Stefano Mazzoleni;Lee M. Talbot

  • Changes of forest cover and disturbance regimes in the mountain forests of the Alps.

    P. Bebi;R. Seidl;R. Motta;M. Fuhr

  • Distribution and economic potential of the Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Europe

    Marco Conedera;Maria Chiara Manetti;Fulvio Giudici;Emilio Amorini

  • A palaeoecological attempt to classify fire sensitivity of trees in the Southern Alps

    Willy Tinner;Marco Conedera;Erika Gobet;Priska Hubschmid

  • Fire regime changes and major driving forces in Spain from 1968 to 2010

    M. Vanesa Moreno;Marco Conedera;Emilio Chuvieco;Gianni Boris Pezzatti

  • Long-distance transport of macroscopic charcoal by an intensive crown fire in the Swiss Alps - implications for fire history reconstruction

    Willy Tinner;Simone Hofstetter;Fabienne Zeugin;Marco Conedera

  • The 2018 European heatwave led to stem dehydration but not to consistent growth reductions in forests

    Unknown

  • Soil respiration and soil microbial biomass after fire in a sweet chestnut forest in southern Switzerland

    Christoph Wüthrich;Daniel Schaub;Markus Weber;Peter Marxer

  • Root reinforcement dynamics of European coppice woodlands and their effect on shallow landslides: A review

    C Vergani;F Giadrossich;P Buckley;M Conedera

  • Weather and human impacts on forest fires: 100 years of fire history in two climatic regions of Switzerland

    Thomas Zumbrunnen;Thomas Zumbrunnen;Gianni B. Pezzatti;Patricia Menéndez;Patricia Menéndez;Harald Bugmann

  • Consequences of forest fires on the hydrogeological response of mountain catchments: a case study of the Riale Buffaga, Ticino, Switzerland

    Marco Conedera;Larissa Peter;Peter Marxer;Felix Forster

Frequent Co-Authors

Willy Tinner
Willy Tinner University of Bern
Daniele Colombaroli
Daniele Colombaroli Royal Holloway University of London
Thomas Wohlgemuth
Thomas Wohlgemuth Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Marco Moretti
Marco Moretti Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Brigitta Ammann
Brigitta Ammann University of Bern
Carlo Ricotta
Carlo Ricotta Sapienza University of Rome
Matthias Bürgi
Matthias Bürgi Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Mikhail Kanevski
Mikhail Kanevski University of Lausanne
Cathy Whitlock
Cathy Whitlock Montana State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring ecology and evolution opens doors to diverse, interdisciplinary careers. Many students find themselves interested in related fields such as healthcare, communication sciences, or public health. Fortunately, there are flexible education options, including online programs, that let you pivot or complement your studies in ecology and evolution with other career pathways.

For example, if you have a background in communication sciences, the SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates offers a streamlined way to transition into speech-language pathology—a field that combines science, healthcare, and human development.

If you are interested in fast-tracking your entry into nursing, look for the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs designed for non-nurses. These programs let you build on your existing bachelor’s degree, making a healthcare career more accessible.

Prospective nurse practitioners should consider opportunities for specialization. For those interested in mental health, the dnp pmhnp salary data can help you assess earning potential across states. Wondering about the path ahead? Discover how long to become a nurse practitioner and plan your career trajectory efficiently.

Online degrees and career pathways can empower you to diversify your expertise and adapt to the evolving job market, whether staying within ecology and evolution or branching into allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Conedera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles