World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
11294
World Ranking
9526
National Ranking
4037

Mujdat Cetin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mujdat Cetin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 305 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mujdat Cetin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mujdat Cetin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mujdat Cetin is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States and has contributed extensively to fields intersecting engineering and neuroscience. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and advanced imaging techniques.

The scientist's work covers a variety of subfields including:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Aerospace Engineering

Within these domains, the main topics addressed in their publications include:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
  • Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The scientist has published frequently in several academic venues, primarily:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging
  • Electronic Imaging
  • Applied Neuropsychology Child
  • IEEE Signal Processing Magazine

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Mujdat Cetin include:

  • "Plug-and-Play Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Formation Using Deep Priors," 2020, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging
  • "A mobile app that uses neurofeedback and multi-sensory learning methods improves reading abilities in dyslexia: A pilot study," 2021, Applied Neuropsychology Child
  • "Changes in EEG complexity with neurofeedback and multi-sensory learning in children with dyslexia: A multiscale entropy analysis," 2020, Applied Neuropsychology Child
  • "An interactive time series image analysis software for dendritic spines," 2022, Scientific Reports
  • "A Hybrid End-to-End Spatiotemporal Attention Neural Network With Graph-Smooth Signals for EEG Emotion Recognition," 2023, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems

Mujdat Cetin collaborates regularly with a number of frequent coauthors including:

  • Shadi Sartipi
  • Narges Mohammadi
  • Marvin M. Doyley
  • Canberk Ekmekci
  • Mastaneh Torkamani-Azar

Best Publications

  • A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays

    D. Malioutov;M. Cetin;A.S. Willsky

  • Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging

    Lee C Potter;Emre Ertin;Jason T Parker;Mujdat Cetin

  • Feature-enhanced synthetic aperture radar image formation based on nonquadratic regularization

    M. Cetin;W.C. Karl

  • A nonparametric statistical method for image segmentation using information theory and curve evolution

    Junmo Kim;J.W. Fisher;A. Yezzi;M. Cetin

  • Homotopy continuation for sparse signal representation

    D.M. Malioutov;M. Cetin;A.S. Willsky

  • Sparsity-Driven Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging: Reconstruction, autofocusing, moving targets, and compressed sensing

    Mujdat Cetin;Ivana Stojanovic;Ozben Onhon;Kush Varshney

  • A Fast Algorithm for Vision-Based Hand Gesture Recognition for Robot Control

    A. Malima;E. Ozgur;M. Cetin

  • Drowsy driver detection through facial movement analysis

    Esra Vural;Mujdat Cetin;Aytul Ercil;Gwen Littlewort

  • Distributed fusion in sensor networks

    M. Cetin;Lei Chen;J.W. Fisher;A.T. Ihler

  • A Sparsity-Driven Approach for Joint SAR Imaging and Phase Error Correction

    N. Ö Onhon;M. Cetin

  • Sparse Representation in Structured Dictionaries With Application to Synthetic Aperture Radar

    K.R. Varshney;M. Cetin;J.W. Fisher;A.S. Willsky

  • Sparse representation-based synthetic aperture radar imaging

    Sadegh Samadi;Müjdat Çetin;Mohammad Ali Masnadi-Shirazi

  • Wide-angle SAR imaging

    Randolph L. Moses;Lee C. Potter;Mujdat Cetin

  • Nonparametric methods for image segmentation using information theory and curve evolution

    Junmo Kim;J.W. Fisher;A. Yezzi;M. Cetin

  • Nonparametric shape priors for active contour-based image segmentation

    Junmo Kim;Müjdat Çetin;Alan S. Willsky

  • An Augmented Lagrangian Method for Complex-Valued Compressed SAR Imaging

    H. Emre Guven;Alper Gungor;Mujdat Cetin

  • Optimal sparse representations in general overcomplete bases

    D.M. Malioutov;M. Cetin;A.S. Willsky

  • Data association based on optimization in graphical models with application to sensor networks

    Lei Chen;Martin J. Wainwright;MüJdat ÇEtin;Alan S. Willsky

  • A variational technique for source localization based on a sparse signal reconstruction perspective

    Mujdat Cetin;Dmitry M. Malioutov;Alan S. Willsky

  • Feature enhancement and ATR performance using nonquadratic optimization-based SAR imaging

    M. Cetin;W.C. Karl;D.A. Castanon

Frequent Co-Authors

Tolga Tasdizen
Tolga Tasdizen University of Utah
William Clement Karl
William Clement Karl Boston University
Marian Stewart Bartlett
Marian Stewart Bartlett Apple (United States)
Javier R. Movellan
Javier R. Movellan University of California, San Diego
Randolph L. Moses
Randolph L. Moses The Ohio State University
Junmo Kim
Junmo Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
David A. Castanon
David A. Castanon Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up numerous options for students interested in pursuing computer science and related fields. Today, you can find flexible programs at all levels, from associate to doctorate, delivered entirely online.

For those seeking a quick entry into the tech world, there are easy online associate degrees that lay a strong foundation in computer science and information technology. These programs are ideal for students who want to access job opportunities sooner.

Higher-level career advancement may require further academic credentials. Educators and professionals looking for advanced leadership roles can benefit from pursuing the cheapest doctorate of education online, ensuring a balance between career growth and affordability.

When selecting a program, it’s crucial to consider accreditation to guarantee quality and industry recognition. You can explore respected, online degrees accredited by national agencies to support your long-term goals.

Interested in gaming or interactive media? Check out the game design degree online, a popular choice for creative minds eager to enter the fast-growing gaming industry.

Best Scientists Citing Mujdat Cetin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles