World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marian Stewart Bartlett

Marian Stewart Bartlett

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
16972
World Ranking
6025
National Ranking
2711

Marian Stewart Bartlett publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marian Stewart Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marian Stewart Bartlett D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marian Stewart Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Marian Stewart Bartlett is affiliated with Apple in the United States. Their research activities focus primarily on the field of psychology, with a specialization in applied psychology. The main topics of their work include digital mental health interventions.

Their recent publication is titled Assessing the feasibility of large-scale digital sensing for depression and anxiety: The Digital Mental Health Study, published in 2025 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). This work investigates approaches to digital sensing aimed at monitoring mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety.

Frequent collaborators of Marian Stewart Bartlett have included:

  • Christie Douglas
  • Eliza Congdon
  • Crane Huang
  • Darsol Seok
  • Zachary D. Cohen

Their research has been published in venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Marian Stewart Bartlett's contributions in psychology are marked by their focus on applying digital technology methods within mental health contexts. Their membership in the National Academy of Sciences, awarded in 1993, indicates recognition within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Face recognition by independent component analysis

    M.S. Bartlett;J.R. Movellan;T.J. Sejnowski

  • Classifying facial actions

    G. Donato;M.S. Bartlett;J.C. Hager;P. Ekman

  • Dynamics of facial expression extracted automatically from video

    Gwen Littlewort;Marian Stewart Bartlett;Ian Fasel;Joshua Susskind

  • Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA

    Bruce A. Draper;Kyungim Baek;Marian Stewart Bartlett;J. Ross Beveridge

  • Recognizing facial expression: machine learning and application to spontaneous behavior

    M.S. Bartlett;G. Littlewort;M. Frank;C. Lainscsek

  • Real Time Face Detection and Facial Expression Recognition: Development and Applications to Human Computer Interaction.

    Marian Stewart Bartlett;Gwen Littlewort;Ian Fasel;Javier R. Movellan

  • The computer expression recognition toolbox (CERT)

    Gwen Littlewort;Jacob Whitehill;Tingfan Wu;Ian Fasel

  • Fitting a Straight Line When Both Variables are Subject to Error

    M. S. Bartlett

  • Automatic Recognition of Facial Actions in Spontaneous Expressions

    Marian Stewart Bartlett;Gwen C. Littlewort;Mark G. Frank;Claudia Lainscsek

  • Measuring facial expressions by computer image analysis.

    Marian Stewart Bartlett;Joseph C. Hager;Paul Ekman;Terrence J. Sejnowski;Terrence J. Sejnowski

  • Independent component representations for face recognition

    Marian Stewart Bartlett;Martin H. Lades;Terrence J. Sejnowski

  • Fully Automatic Facial Action Recognition in Spontaneous Behavior

    M.S. Bartlett;G. Littlewort;M. Frank;C. Lainscsek

  • Toward Practical Smile Detection

    J. Whitehill;G. Littlewort;I. Fasel;M. Bartlett

  • Drowsy driver detection through facial movement analysis

    Esra Vural;Mujdat Cetin;Aytul Ercil;Gwen Littlewort

  • Automatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain

    Gwen C. Littlewort;Marian Stewart Bartlett;Kang Lee

  • Automatic Decoding of Facial Movements Reveals Deceptive Pain Expressions

    Marian Stewart Bartlett;Gwen C. Littlewort;Mark G. Frank;Kang Lee

  • Machine learning methods for fully automatic recognition of facial expressions and facial actions

    M.S. Bartlett;G. Littlewort;C. Lainscsek;I. Fasel

  • Human and computer recognition of facial expressions of emotion.

    J.M. Susskind;G. Littlewort;M.S. Bartlett;J. Movellan

  • Facial expression recognition using Gabor motion energy filters

    Tingfan Wu;Marian S. Bartlett;Javier R. Movellan

  • Faces of pain: automated measurement of spontaneousallfacial expressions of genuine and posed pain

    Gwen C. Littlewort;Marian Stewart Bartlett;Kang Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Javier R. Movellan
Javier R. Movellan University of California, San Diego
Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Mujdat Cetin
Mujdat Cetin University of Rochester
Mark G. Frank
Mark G. Frank University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Piotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman University of California, San Diego
Paul Ekman
Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
Judy Reilly
Judy Reilly San Diego State University
Abhinav Dhall
Abhinav Dhall Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career possibilities. For those wanting to enter the field quickly, accelerated cs degree programs offer a faster pathway to graduation, making it easier for students to join the workforce sooner.

The interdisciplinary nature of technology also allows for crossover with other fields. For example, by learning what can you do with an environmental science major, students can understand how computer science enhances research, modeling, and data analysis in environmental studies.

Similarly, those interested in engineering can benefit from online options, such as reviewing the online environmental engineering degree programs, which showcase how computer and engineering skills go hand-in-hand. Understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education can also inform your decision, especially if you are considering a double major or a shift in discipline.

Ultimately, these related online degree pathways equip students with versatile skills and open diverse career opportunities at the intersection of technology, science, and engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Marian Stewart Bartlett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles