World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marko Scholze

Marko Scholze

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6837
World Ranking
8031
National Ranking
154

Marko Scholze publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Scholze sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Marko Scholze D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marko Scholze sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marko Scholze is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans multiple subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Mechanical Engineering, Economics and Econometrics, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main research topics addressed by Scholze include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies.

Scholze has published papers in several well-known scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Earth system science data
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Scholze are:

  • Toward an Operational Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions Monitoring and Verification Support Capacity, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Changes in net ecosystem exchange over Europe during the 2018 drought based on atmospheric observations, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The regional European atmospheric transport inversion comparison, EUROCOM: first results on European-wide terrestrial carbon fluxes for the period 2006-2015, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Using SMOS soil moisture data combining CO2 flask samples to constrain carbon fluxes during 2010-2015 within a Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS), 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • The CO2 Human Emissions (CHE) Project: First Steps Towards a European Operational Capacity to Monitor Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions, 2021, Frontiers in Remote Sensing

Scholze has collaborated frequently with coauthors including Guillaume Monteil, Philippe Peylin, Grégoire Broquet, Christoph Gerbig, and Rona L. Thompson. These partnerships reflect a broad engagement in atmospheric and environmental science research communities.

Best Publications

  • A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems

    Marko Scholze;Wolfgang Knorr;Nigel W. Arnell;I. Colin Prentice

  • Pollen-based continental climate reconstructions at 6 and 21 ka: A global synthesis

    Patrick J Bartlein;S P Harrison;S P Harrison;S Brewer;Simon Connor

  • Two decades of terrestrial carbon fluxes from a carbon cycle data assimilation system (CCDAS)

    Peter J. Rayner;Marko Scholze;Marko Scholze;Wolfgang Knorr;Wolfgang Knorr;Thomas Kaminski

  • Increased water-use efficiency and reduced CO2 uptake by plants during droughts at a continental scale

    Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;Ivar R. van der Velde;Ivar R. van der Velde;Erik van Schaik;John B. Miller

  • Large inert carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during the Last Glacial Maximum

    P. Ciais;A. Tagliabue;A. Tagliabue;M. Cuntz;L. Bopp

  • Propagating uncertainty through prognostic carbon cycle data assimilation system simulations

    Marko Scholze;Thomas Kaminski;Peter Rayner;Wolfgang Knorr

  • The Greenhouse Gas Climate Change Initiative (GHG-CCI): Comparison and quality assessment of near-surface-sensitive satellite-derived CO2 and CH4 global data sets

    M Buchwitz;Markus Reuter;O Schneising;Hartmut Boesch

  • MERLIN: A French-German Space Lidar Mission Dedicated to Atmospheric Methane

    Gerhard Ehret;Philippe Bousquet;Clémence Pierangelo;Matthias Alpers

  • Toward an operational anthropogenic CO2 emissions monitoring and verification support capacity

    G. Janssens-Maenhout;B. Pinty;M. Dowell;H. Zunker

  • Constraining temperature variations over the last millennium by comparing simulated and observed atmospheric CO2

    S. Gerber;F. Joos;P. Brugger;T. F. Stocker

  • CO2 inhibition of global terrestrial isoprene emissions: Potential implications for atmospheric chemistry

    Almut Arneth;Paul A. Miller;Marko Scholze;Thomas Hickler

  • A Comparison of Spectral Angle Mapper and Artificial Neural Network Classifiers Combined with Landsat TM Imagery Analysis for Obtaining Burnt Area Mapping

    George P. Petropoulos;Krishna Prasad Vadrevu;Gavriil Xanthopoulos;George Karantounias

  • Carbon cycle data assimilation with a generic phenology model

    W. Knorr;T. Kaminski;M. Scholze;N. Gobron

  • The BETHY/JSBACH Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System: experiences and challenges

    T. Kaminski;W. Knorr;G. Schürmann;M. Scholze

  • Investigating the usefulness of satellite-derived fluorescence data in inferring gross primary productivity within the carbon cycle data assimilation system

    E. N. Koffi;P. J. Rayner;A. J. Norton;C. Frankenberg

  • Consistent assimilation of MERIS FAPAR and atmospheric CO2 into a terrestrial vegetation model and interactive mission benefit analysis

    T. Kaminski;Wolfgang Knorr;Wolfgang Knorr;Marko Scholze;Marko Scholze;N. Gobron

  • Changes in net ecosystem exchange over Europe during the 2018 drought based on atmospheric observations.

    R. L. Thompson;G. Broquet;Christoph Gerbig;Thomas Koch;Thomas Koch

  • Modeling Potential Equilibrium States of Vegetation and Terrestrial Water Cycle of Mesoamerica under Climate Change Scenarios

    Pablo Imbach;Luis Guillermo Molina;Bruno Locatelli;Olivier Roupsard

  • Estimating global gross primary productivity using chlorophyll fluorescence and a data assimilation system with the BETHY-SCOPE model

    Alexander J. Norton;Peter J. Rayner;Ernest N. Koffi;Marko Scholze

  • Modeling terrestrial 13C cycling: Climate, land use and fire

    Marko Scholze;Marko Scholze;P. Ciais;M. Heimann

  • Simultaneous assimilation of SMOS soil moisture and atmospheric CO2 in-situ observations to constrain the global terrestrial carbon cycle

    M. Scholze;T. Kaminski;W. Knorr;S. Blessing

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Knorr
Wolfgang Knorr Lund University
Peter Rayner
Peter Rayner University of Melbourne
F. Chevallier
F. Chevallier University of Paris-Saclay
Michael Buchwitz
Michael Buchwitz University of Bremen
Martin Heimann
Martin Heimann Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Nadine Gobron
Nadine Gobron European Commission Joint Research Centre
Wouter Peters
Wouter Peters Wageningen University & Research
Christoph Gerbig
Christoph Gerbig Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Sander Houweling
Sander Houweling Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christian Rödenbeck
Christian Rödenbeck Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, a variety of online degree options offer specialized knowledge that can enhance career prospects. Pursuing an online geology degree provides a strong foundation in earth systems and natural resource management, essential for roles in environmental consultancy or conservation efforts.

Similarly, GIS degree programs focus on spatial data analysis and mapping technologies, critical tools in environmental planning and disaster management. These skills are increasingly in demand across government agencies and private sectors.

On the administrative side, studying for the best online MPA equips students with leadership and policy-making expertise. This can lead to impactful careers in environmental policy, public administration, and sustainable community development.

In addition, an online bachelors degree programs in sociology explores human-environment interactions and social dynamics, preparing graduates for roles in environmental justice, advocacy, and education.

Together, these pathways offer diverse opportunities tailored to different interests within Environmental Sciences, empowering students to address complex environmental challenges effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Marko Scholze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles