World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9789
World Ranking
5371
National Ranking
2458

Peter Gerstoft publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gerstoft sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 413 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Gerstoft D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gerstoft sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Gerstoft is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within Computer Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Engineering. Within these fields, Gerstoft's work focuses on subfields such as Signal Processing, Oceanography, Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their scientific contributions involve numerous topics, including:

  • Underwater Acoustics Research
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Blind Source Separation Techniques
  • Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies

Gerstoft's recent publications demonstrate a focus on acoustic signal processing and direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation methods. Selected examples include:

  • Gridless DOA Estimation and Root-MUSIC for Non-Uniform Linear Arrays, 2021, published in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
  • A feedforward neural network for direction-of-arrival estimation, 2020, published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Gaussian processes for sound field reconstruction, 2021, published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Deep transfer learning for underwater direction of arrival using one vector sensor, 2021, published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Three-dimensional source localization using sparse Bayesian learning on a spherical microphone array, 2020, published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Their collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Yongsung Park, Michael J. Bianco, William F. Jenkins, Efrén Fernández-Grande, and Zoi-Heleni Michalopoulou. Gerstoft has maintained a substantial publication record in venues focused on acoustics and signal processing, including:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
  • JASA Express Letters
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Best Publications

  • Extracting time-domain Green's function estimates from ambient seismic noise

    Karim G. Sabra;Peter Gerstoft;Philippe Roux;W. A. Kuperman

  • Machine learning in acoustics: Theory and applications

    Michael J. Bianco;Peter Gerstoft;James Traer;Emma Ozanich

  • Machine Learning in Seismology: Turning Data into Insights

    Qingkai Kong;Daniel T. Trugman;Zachary E. Ross;Michael J. Bianco

  • Inversion of seismoacoustic data using genetic algorithms and a posteriori probability distributions

    Peter Gerstoft

  • Compressive beamforming.

    Unknown

  • Multisnapshot Sparse Bayesian Learning for DOA

    Peter Gerstoft;Christoph F. Mecklenbrauker;Angeliki Xenaki;Santosh Nannuru

  • Ocean acoustic inversion with estimation of a posteriori probability distributions

    Peter Gerstoft;Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker

  • Inversion for refractivity parameters from radar sea clutter

    Peter Gerstoft;L. Ted Rogers;Jeffrey L. Krolik;William S. Hodgkiss

  • Source localization in an ocean waveguide using supervised machine learning.

    Haiqiang Niu;Emma Reeves;Peter Gerstoft

  • Compressive sensing of the Tohoku-Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake: Frequency-dependent rupture modes

    Huajian Yao;Peter Gerstoft;Peter M. Shearer;Christoph Mecklenbräuker

  • A sparse equivalent source method for near-field acoustic holography

    Efren Fernandez-Grande;Angeliki Xenaki;Peter Gerstoft

  • Ship localization in Santa Barbara Channel using machine learning classifiers.

    Haiqiang Niu;Emma Ozanich;Peter Gerstoft

  • Grid-free compressive beamforming

    Angeliki Xenaki;Peter Gerstoft

  • The seismic traffic footprint: Tracking trains, aircraft, and cars seismically

    Nima Riahi;Peter Gerstoft

  • Gridless DOA Estimation and Root-MUSIC for Non-Uniform Linear Arrays

    Mark Wagner;Yongsung Park;Peter Gerstoft

  • Inversion of acoustic data using a combination of genetic algorithms and the Gauss–Newton approach

    Peter Gerstoft

  • Refractivity estimation from sea clutter: An invited review

    Ali Karimian;Caglar Yardim;Peter Gerstoft;William S. Hodgkiss

  • Tracking Refractivity from Clutter Using Kalman and Particle Filters

    C. Yardim;P. Gerstoft;W.S. Hodgkiss

  • Pelagic and coastal sources of P‐wave microseisms: Generation under tropical cyclones

    Jian Zhang;Peter Gerstoft;Peter D. Bromirski

  • Multiple and single snapshot compressive beamforming

    Peter Gerstoft;Angeliki Xenaki;Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker

  • Multi-frequency sparse Bayesian learning for robust matched field processing.

    Kay L. Gemba;Santosh Nannuru;Peter Gerstoft;William S. Hodgkiss

  • Estimation of radio refractivity from Radar clutter using Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis

    C. Yardim;P. Gerstoft;W.S. Hodgkiss

  • Deep-learning source localization using multi-frequency magnitude-only data

    Haiqiang Niu;Zaixiao Gong;Emma Ozanich;Peter Gerstoft

  • A feedforward neural network for direction-of-arrival estimation

    Emma Ozanich;Peter Gerstoft;Haiqiang Niu

  • Multi Snapshot Sparse Bayesian Learning for DOA Estimation

    Peter Gerstoft;Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker;Angeliki Xenaki

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Hodgkiss
William S. Hodgkiss University of California, San Diego
Peter D. Bromirski
Peter D. Bromirski University of California, San Diego
Ralph A. Stephen
Ralph A. Stephen Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Richard C. Aster
Richard C. Aster Colorado State University
William A. Kuperman
William A. Kuperman University of California, San Diego
Peter M. Shearer
Peter M. Shearer University of California, San Diego
Andrew A. Nyblade
Andrew A. Nyblade Pennsylvania State University
Douglas A. Wiens
Douglas A. Wiens Washington University in St. Louis
Heechun Song
Heechun Song Scripps Institution of Oceanography

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Today’s students have more flexible options than ever for pursuing a Computer Science education in the USA. For those worried about previous academic performance, several online schools that accept low gpa provide accessible entry points into respected degree programs. This makes it possible for a wider range of learners to start building towards a rewarding tech career.

Accelerated programs are another popular choice. An accelerated computer science degree lets motivated students complete their studies more quickly, get ahead of the competition, and enter the workforce faster.

For those interested in how technology intersects with the environment, consider exploring related fields. There are many high-paying jobs with environmental science degree credentials, ranging from data analysis to environmental consultancy. Alternatively, those wanting a strong engineering focus can seek out environmental engineering schools online that offer affordable and specialized learning pathways.

No matter your background, interests, or schedule, there are online degree options and career pathways in technology and related fields to match your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gerstoft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles