World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14073
World Ranking
4305
National Ranking
1949

Judith Saxton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith Saxton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 150 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Judith Saxton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith Saxton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Judith Saxton is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with particular attention to psychiatry and mental health, geriatrics and gerontology, cognitive neuroscience, economics and econometrics, and epidemiology.

The scientist's recent work centers on dementia and cognitive impairment research, frailty in older adults, the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, and chronic disease management strategies.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Judith Saxton include:

  • Measurement and Structure of Cognition in the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (2020), Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Methodological considerations in designing and implementing the harmonized diagnostic assessment of dementia for longitudinal aging study in India (LASI-DAD) (2020), Biodemography and Social Biology
  • Measurement and Structure of Cognition in the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (2020), Innovation in Aging

Frequent coauthors of Judith Saxton include:

  • Pranali Khobragade
  • Alden L. Gross
  • Erik Meijer
  • Joyita Banerjee
  • Urvashi Jain

The most common publication venues for Judith Saxton's work are:

  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Biodemography and Social Biology
  • Innovation in Aging

Best Publications

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial.

    Steven T. DeKosky;Steven T. DeKosky;Jeff D. Williamson;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;Richard A. Kronmal

  • The natural history of Alzheimer's disease. Description of study cohort and accuracy of diagnosis.

    J T Becker;F Boller;O L Lopez;J Saxton

  • Sex differences in brain aging : A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study

    C. Edward Coffey;Joseph F. Lucke;Judith A. Saxton;Graham Ratcliff

  • Ginkgo biloba for preventing cognitive decline in older adults: a randomized trial.

    Beth E. Snitz;Ellen S. O’Meara;Michelle C. Carlson;Alice M. Arnold

  • Amyloid Deposition Begins in the Striatum of Presenilin-1 Mutation Carriers from Two Unrelated Pedigrees

    William E. Klunk;Julie C. Price;Chester A. Mathis;Nicholas D. Tsopelas

  • Severe impairment battery. A neuropsychological test for severely demented patients.

    M Panisset;M Roudier;J Saxton;F Boller

  • Amyloid imaging in mild cognitive impairment subtypes

    David A. Wolk;David A. Wolk;Julie C. Price;Judy A. Saxton;Beth E. Snitz

  • Outcomes of Mild Cognitive Impairment by Definition: A Population Study

    Mary Ganguli;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton;Chung Chou H. Chang

  • Cholinesterase inhibitor treatment alters the natural history of Alzheimer's disease

    O L Lopez;J T Becker;S Wisniewski;J Saxton

  • Long-term effects of the concomitant use of memantine with cholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer disease

    Oscar L Lopez;James T Becker;Abdus S Wahed;Judith Saxton

  • Psychiatric symptoms vary with the severity of dementia in probable Alzheimer's disease.

    Oscar L. Lopez;James T. Becker;Robert A. Sweet;William Klunk

  • Relation of education to brain size in normal aging: Implications for the reserve hypothesis

    C.E. Coffey;J.A. Saxton;G. Ratcliff;R.N. Bryan

  • Basal Cerebral Metabolism May Modulate the Cognitive Effects of Aβ in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Example of Brain Reserve

    Ann D. Cohen;Julie C. Price;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Jeffrey James

  • Assessment of the severely impaired patient: Description and validation of a new neuropsychological test battery.

    Judith Saxton;Karen L. McGonigle-Gibson;Andrew A. Swihart;Vicki J. Miller

  • Preclinical Alzheimer disease Neuropsychological test performance 1.5 to 8 years prior to onset

    Judith Saxton;O. L. Lopez;G. Ratcliff;C. Dulberg

  • Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by multiple classifications: The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) project.

    Mary Ganguli;Chung-Chou H. Chang;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton

  • The Severe Impairment Battery : Concurrent validity and the assessment of longitudinal change in Alzheimer's disease

    Frederick A. Schmitt;Wesson Ashford;Christopher Ernesto;Judith Saxton

  • Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment.

    Judith Saxton;Lisa Morrow;Amy Eschman;Gretchen Archer

  • The Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory (GEM) study: design and baseline data of a randomized trial of Ginkgo biloba extract in prevention of dementia.

    Steven T. DeKosky;Annette Fitzpatrick;Diane G. Ives;Judith Saxton

  • Research evaluation and diagnosis of possible Alzheimer’s disease over the last two decades: II

    Oscar L. Lopez;J. T. Becker;W. Klunk;J. Saxton

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Robert D. Nebes
Robert D. Nebes University of Pittsburgh
Caterina Rosano
Caterina Rosano University of Pittsburgh
Linda P. Fried
Linda P. Fried Columbia University
Anne B. Newman
Anne B. Newman University of Pittsburgh
François Boller
François Boller National Institutes of Health
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying neuroscience, there are many flexible pathways to achieve your educational goals. Many universities now offer accelerated online programs, allowing you to complete your neuroscience or related bachelor's degree in less time than traditional options.

Neuroscience and other STEM degrees often rank among the highest earning degrees, opening doors to lucrative careers in research, healthcare, pharmaceuticals, data science, and technology. If you are considering adjacent fields, there are many interesting majors that pay well, such as biomedical engineering or cognitive science, both of which complement neuroscience expertise.

Financing your education is important, especially for online learners. Fortunately, many online colleges that accept fafsa can make earning your degree more affordable and accessible.

Exploring these related options helps you prepare for a rewarding neuroscience career, whether you're entering the workforce or pursuing graduate study.

Best Scientists Citing Judith Saxton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles