World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
17128
World Ranking
3942
National Ranking
1789

Beth E. Snitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Snitz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 269 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Beth E. Snitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Snitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beth E. Snitz is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientific contributions cover multiple specialized areas related to brain health and cognitive function.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Beth E. Snitz has published extensively in a variety of journals and venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent collaborators in their work include the following researchers:

  • Ann D. Cohen
  • Oscar L. López
  • William E. Klunk
  • Mary Ganguli
  • Victor L. Villemagne

Prominent recent publications by Beth E. Snitz include:

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Parenchymal border macrophages regulate the flow dynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid, 2022, Nature
  • Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study, 2020, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Direct Comparison of the Tau PET Tracers¹⁸F-Flortaucipir and¹⁸F-MK-6240 in Human Subjects, 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers predict the deposition and progression of amyloid-β in cognitively unimpaired older adults, 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity

Best Publications

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial.

    Steven T. DeKosky;Steven T. DeKosky;Jeff D. Williamson;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;Richard A. Kronmal

  • Cognitive Deficits in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-analytic Review of Putative Endophenotypes

    Beth E. Snitz;Angus W. MacDonald;Cameron S. Carter;Cameron S. Carter

  • Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies.

    José L. Molinuevo;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Rebecca Amariglio;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Ginkgo biloba for preventing cognitive decline in older adults: a randomized trial.

    Beth E. Snitz;Ellen S. O’Meara;Michelle C. Carlson;Alice M. Arnold

  • Amyloid Deposition Begins in the Striatum of Presenilin-1 Mutation Carriers from Two Unrelated Pedigrees

    William E. Klunk;Julie C. Price;Chester A. Mathis;Nicholas D. Tsopelas

  • Amyloid imaging in mild cognitive impairment subtypes

    David A. Wolk;David A. Wolk;Julie C. Price;Judy A. Saxton;Beth E. Snitz

  • Outcomes of Mild Cognitive Impairment by Definition: A Population Study

    Mary Ganguli;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton;Chung Chou H. Chang

  • Parenchymal border macrophages regulate the flow dynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid

    Unknown

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Lateral and medial hypofrontality in first-episode schizophrenia: Functional activity in a medication-naive state and effects of short-term atypical antipsychotic treatment

    Beth E. Snitz;Angus MacDonald;Jonathan D. Cohen;Raymond Y. Cho

  • Cost effectiveness of clozapine in neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia.

    Herbert Y. Meltzer;B. A. Philip Cola;Lynne Way;Paul A. Thompson

  • Basal Cerebral Metabolism May Modulate the Cognitive Effects of Aβ in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Example of Brain Reserve

    Ann D. Cohen;Julie C. Price;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Jeffrey James

  • Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by multiple classifications: The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) project.

    Mary Ganguli;Chung-Chou H. Chang;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton

  • Pulse wave velocity is associated with β-amyloid deposition in the brains of very elderly adults

    Timothy M. Hughes;Lewis H. Kuller;Emma J.M. Barinas-Mitchell;Rachel H. Mackey

  • Age and education effects and norms on a cognitive test battery from a population-based cohort: the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team

    Mary Ganguli;Beth E. Snitz;Ching-Wen Lee;Joni Vanderbilt

  • Mild cognitive impairment: Incidence and vascular risk factors in a population-based cohort

    Mary Ganguli;Bo Fu;Beth E. Snitz;Tiffany F. Hughes

  • Subjective Cognitive Complaints, Personality and Brain Amyloid-beta in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

    Beth E. Snitz;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Ann D. Cohen;Oscar L. Lopez

  • Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects

    Hyun Kook Lim;Hyun Kook Lim;Robert Nebes;Beth Snitz;Ann Cohen

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction

    William M. Grove;David H. Zald;Boyd S. Lebow;Beth E. Snitz

  • Patterns of Mild Cognitive Impairment After Treatment of Depression in the Elderly

    Rishi K. Bhalla;Meryl A. Butters;James T. Becker;Patricia R. Houck

  • The long-term effects of conventional and atypical antipsychotics in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.

    Oscar L. Lopez;James T. Becker;Yue-Fang Chang;Robert A. Sweet

  • Functional and cognitive criteria produce different rates of mild cognitive impairment and conversion to dementia

    Judith Saxton;Beth E Snitz;Oscar L Lopez;Diane G Ives

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh
Robert D. Nebes
Robert D. Nebes University of Pittsburgh
Laura A. Rabin
Laura A. Rabin City University of New York
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania
Milos D. Ikonomovic
Milos D. Ikonomovic University of Pittsburgh
David A. Loewenstein
David A. Loewenstein University of Miami
Kirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to follow a traditional, on-campus route. Today, you’ll find a growing list of what certifications can i get online that can boost your career in neuroscience, psychology, and other health fields. These flexible credentials may supplement your existing studies or help you transition into interdisciplinary roles related to neuroscience.

For students looking for accessible entry points, there are also easiest online college degree options, which can serve as a foundation before specializing further in neuroscience or adjacent fields like counseling, research, or healthcare.

Career-minded graduates might consider advanced programs closely connected to neuroscience, such as msw online programs (Master of Social Work), ideal for those passionate about mental health and clinical practice. Alternatively, earning a behavioral analysis credential through online bcba masters programs can open doors to specialized roles working with individuals with behavioral and developmental challenges.

Exploring these online pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and the chance to tailor your neuroscience career to your unique goals.

Best Scientists Citing Beth E. Snitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles