World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 59 3942 3610 1789 1612 269 17128

Beth E. Snitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Beth E. Snitz between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Beth E. Snitz published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2025. 83 of the 348 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2025. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 51 publications
1993 2025

348 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Beth E. Snitz: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 7
2009 12
2010 10
2011 5
2012 10
2013 23
2014 17
2015 19
2016 15
2017 10
2018 16
2019 12
2020 17
2021 22
2022 19
2023 33
2024 32
2025 51
Total 348
Download as CSV

Beth E. Snitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Snitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 268–277 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 269 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175 269
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Beth E. Snitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth E. Snitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334 59
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Beth E. Snitz is a researcher affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The scientific contributions cover multiple specialized areas related to brain health and cognitive function.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Beth E. Snitz has published extensively in a variety of journals and venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent collaborators in their work include the following researchers:

  • Ann D. Cohen
  • Oscar L. López
  • William E. Klunk
  • Mary Ganguli
  • Victor L. Villemagne

Prominent recent publications by Beth E. Snitz include:

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Parenchymal border macrophages regulate the flow dynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid, 2022, Nature
  • Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study, 2020, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Direct Comparison of the Tau PET Tracers¹⁸F-Flortaucipir and¹⁸F-MK-6240 in Human Subjects, 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers predict the deposition and progression of amyloid-β in cognitively unimpaired older adults, 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity

Best Publications

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • Ginkgo biloba for prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial.

    Steven T. DeKosky;Steven T. DeKosky;Jeff D. Williamson;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;Richard A. Kronmal

  • Cognitive Deficits in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Schizophrenia Patients: A Meta-analytic Review of Putative Endophenotypes

    Beth E. Snitz;Angus W. MacDonald;Cameron S. Carter;Cameron S. Carter

  • Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies.

    José L. Molinuevo;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Rebecca Amariglio;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Ginkgo biloba for preventing cognitive decline in older adults: a randomized trial.

    Beth E. Snitz;Ellen S. O’Meara;Michelle C. Carlson;Alice M. Arnold

  • Amyloid Deposition Begins in the Striatum of Presenilin-1 Mutation Carriers from Two Unrelated Pedigrees

    William E. Klunk;Julie C. Price;Chester A. Mathis;Nicholas D. Tsopelas

  • Amyloid imaging in mild cognitive impairment subtypes

    David A. Wolk;David A. Wolk;Julie C. Price;Judy A. Saxton;Beth E. Snitz

  • Outcomes of Mild Cognitive Impairment by Definition: A Population Study

    Mary Ganguli;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton;Chung Chou H. Chang

  • Parenchymal border macrophages regulate the flow dynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid

    Unknown

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Lateral and medial hypofrontality in first-episode schizophrenia: Functional activity in a medication-naive state and effects of short-term atypical antipsychotic treatment

    Beth E. Snitz;Angus MacDonald;Jonathan D. Cohen;Raymond Y. Cho

  • Cost effectiveness of clozapine in neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia.

    Herbert Y. Meltzer;B. A. Philip Cola;Lynne Way;Paul A. Thompson

  • Basal Cerebral Metabolism May Modulate the Cognitive Effects of Aβ in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Example of Brain Reserve

    Ann D. Cohen;Julie C. Price;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Jeffrey James

  • Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by multiple classifications: The Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) project.

    Mary Ganguli;Chung-Chou H. Chang;Beth E. Snitz;Judith A. Saxton

  • Pulse wave velocity is associated with β-amyloid deposition in the brains of very elderly adults

    Timothy M. Hughes;Lewis H. Kuller;Emma J.M. Barinas-Mitchell;Rachel H. Mackey

  • Age and education effects and norms on a cognitive test battery from a population-based cohort: the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team

    Mary Ganguli;Beth E. Snitz;Ching-Wen Lee;Joni Vanderbilt

  • Mild cognitive impairment: Incidence and vascular risk factors in a population-based cohort

    Mary Ganguli;Bo Fu;Beth E. Snitz;Tiffany F. Hughes

  • Subjective Cognitive Complaints, Personality and Brain Amyloid-beta in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

    Beth E. Snitz;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Ann D. Cohen;Oscar L. Lopez

  • Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects

    Hyun Kook Lim;Hyun Kook Lim;Robert Nebes;Beth Snitz;Ann Cohen

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction

    William M. Grove;David H. Zald;Boyd S. Lebow;Beth E. Snitz

  • Patterns of Mild Cognitive Impairment After Treatment of Depression in the Elderly

    Rishi K. Bhalla;Meryl A. Butters;James T. Becker;Patricia R. Houck

  • The long-term effects of conventional and atypical antipsychotics in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.

    Oscar L. Lopez;James T. Becker;Yue-Fang Chang;Robert A. Sweet

  • Functional and cognitive criteria produce different rates of mild cognitive impairment and conversion to dementia

    Judith Saxton;Beth E Snitz;Oscar L Lopez;Diane G Ives

Frequent Co-Authors

William E. Klunk
William E. Klunk University of Pittsburgh
Oscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez University of Pittsburgh
Chester A. Mathis
Chester A. Mathis University of Pittsburgh
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh
Mary Ganguli
Mary Ganguli University of Pittsburgh
M. Ilyas Kamboh
M. Ilyas Kamboh University of Pittsburgh
Lewis H. Kuller
Lewis H. Kuller University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience doesn’t have to follow a traditional, on-campus route. Today, you’ll find a growing list of what certifications can i get online that can boost your career in neuroscience, psychology, and other health fields. These flexible credentials may supplement your existing studies or help you transition into interdisciplinary roles related to neuroscience.

For students looking for accessible entry points, there are also easiest online college degree options, which can serve as a foundation before specializing further in neuroscience or adjacent fields like counseling, research, or healthcare.

Career-minded graduates might consider advanced programs closely connected to neuroscience, such as msw online programs (Master of Social Work), ideal for those passionate about mental health and clinical practice. Alternatively, earning a behavioral analysis credential through online bcba masters programs can open doors to specialized roles working with individuals with behavioral and developmental challenges.

Exploring these online pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and the chance to tailor your neuroscience career to your unique goals.

Best Scientists Citing Beth E. Snitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles