World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
15226
World Ranking
3800
National Ranking
1738

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
15221
World Ranking
3519
National Ranking
1984

Robert D. Nebes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Nebes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Robert D. Nebes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. Nebes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. Nebes is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement primarily within this institution, indicating a stable base for research and scholarly activities.

While specific recent papers authored by Robert D. Nebes are not listed, the lack of documented frequent co-authors and publication venues suggests a focused or possibly emerging research trajectory. This absence might also indicate a preference for solo work or a limited number of collaborative projects.

No information on book publications or awards is available, which narrows the visible scope of their academic contributions to journal or conference papers, if any. The absence of data regarding fields of study, subfields, or main research topics means precise characterization of their expertise cannot be provided from the existing dataset.

Given these constraints, Robert D. Nebes's professional and research footprint appears minimally documented in the current accessible sources. This highlights the importance of further data acquisition to comprehensively assess their academic impact and specialization.

Best Publications

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population

    Gary G. Briggs;Robert D. Nebes

  • Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items

    Denis Raczkowski;James W. Kalat;Robert Nebes

  • The nature and determinants of neuropsychological functioning in late-life depression.

    Meryl A. Butters;Ellen M. Whyte;Robert D. Nebes;Amy E. Begley

  • Semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease.

    Robert D. Nebes

  • Autobiographical memory across the lifespan.

    David C. Rubin;Scott E. Wetzler;Robert D. Nebes

  • Changes in cognitive functioning following treatment of late-life depression.

    Meryl A. Butters;James T. Becker;Robert D. Nebes;Michelle D. Zmuda

  • Self-Reported Sleep Quality Predicts Poor Cognitive Performance in Healthy Older Adults

    Robert D. Nebes;Daniel J. Buysse;Edythe M. Halligan;Patricia R. Houck

  • Sparing of semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease.

    Robert D. Nebes;David C. Martin;Lisa C. Horn

  • Decreased working memory and processing speed mediate cognitive impairment in geriatric depression.

    R. D. Nebes;M. A. Butters;B. H. Mulsant;B. G. Pollock

  • Neuropsychological function in Alzheimer's disease. Pattern of impairment and rates of progression.

    James T. Becker;F. Jacob Huff;Robert D. Nebes;Audrey L. Holland

  • Persistence of cognitive impairment in geriatric patients following antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial with nortriptyline and paroxetine

    Robert D. Nebes;Bruce G. Pollock;Patricia R. Houck;Meryl A. Butters

  • Regional cerebral blood flow during word and nonword reading.

    A.N. Herbster;M.A. Mintun;R.D. Nebes;J.T. Becker

  • Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man

    Robert D. Nebes

  • Basal Cerebral Metabolism May Modulate the Cognitive Effects of Aβ in Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Example of Brain Reserve

    Ann D. Cohen;Julie C. Price;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Jeffrey James

  • A positron emission tomography (PET) study of autobiographical memory retrieval.

    Martin A. Conway;David J. Turk;Shannon L. Miller;Jessica Logan

  • Automatic and attentional mechanisms of semantic priming in Alzheimer's disease.

    Nebes Rd;Brady Cb;Huff Fj

  • Use of semantic context by patients with Alzheimer's disease.

    Robert D. Nebes;François Boller;Audrey Holland

  • Cognitive deficits and clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

    F. J. Huff;J. T. Becker;S. H. Belle;R. D. Nebes

  • Subjective Cognitive Complaints, Personality and Brain Amyloid-beta in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

    Beth E. Snitz;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Ann D. Cohen;Oscar L. Lopez

  • Regional Brain Activation during Concurrent Implicit and Explicit Sequence Learning

    Howard J. Aizenstein;V. Andrew Stenger;Jennifer Cochran;Kristi Clark

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Howard J. Aizenstein
Howard J. Aizenstein University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh
David J. Madden
David J. Madden Duke University
J. Richard Jennings
J. Richard Jennings University of Pittsburgh
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
David A. Wolk
David A. Wolk University of Pennsylvania
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, particularly in fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many choose to pursue online degrees, which offer flexibility and accessibility, especially for working professionals or those unable to relocate.

If you’re interested in social work, each state has unique education and licensure requirements. For instance, you can explore Kansas social work education requirements to understand the necessary steps for beginning a career there. Similarly, you can review the requirements to be a social worker in Kentucky or learn about Louisiana social work education requirements for guidance on degrees, supervised training hours, and licensing exams.

For those drawn to the Northeast, learn what it takes to begin becoming a social worker in Maine. No matter the state, psychology-related online degrees provide foundational knowledge for diverse roles in education, healthcare, social services, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. Nebes

Recently Published Articles