World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
152
Citations
110311
World Ranking
141
National Ranking
93

Steven T. DeKosky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven T. DeKosky sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 729 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Steven T. DeKosky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven T. DeKosky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 152 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award

Overview

Steven T. DeKosky is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, physiology, neurology, and molecular biology. Their work encompasses a wide range of topics related to brain health and cognitive function.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

They have published extensively in several scientific venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • GeroScience
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven T. DeKosky consist of:

  • The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease (2020), Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders (2021), Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • The Role of Resting-State Network Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Aging (2020), Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer's disease modification (2021), Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Brain and blood biomarkers of tauopathy and neuronal injury in humans and rats with neurobehavioral syndromes following blast exposure (2020), Molecular Psychiatry

Collaboration plays a significant role in their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Michael Marsiske
  • Ronald A. Cohen
  • Adam J. Woods
  • Andrew O'Shea
  • Gene E. Alexander

Best Publications

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria

    Bruno Dubois;Howard H. Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Steven T. DeKosky

  • The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

    Marilyn S. Albert;Steven T. DeKosky;Dennis Dickson;Bruno Dubois

  • Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

    Bruno Dubois;Bruno Dubois;Howard H Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Harald Hampel;Harald Hampel

  • Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: Correlation with cognitive severity

    Steven T. DeKosky;Stephen W. Scheff

  • Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and mild cognitive impairment: results from the cardiovascular health study.

    Constantine G. Lyketsos;Oscar Lopez;Beverly Jones;Annette L. Fitzpatrick

  • Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    R. C. Petersen;J.C. Stevens;M. Ganguli;E. G. Tangalos

  • Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon.

    Bruno Dubois;Howard H. Feldman;Howard H. Feldman;Howard H. Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Jeffrey L. Cummings

  • Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    R. S. Doody;J. C. Stevens;C. Beck;R. M. Dubinsky

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Vascular Cognitive Impairment

    John T O'Brien;Timo Erkinjuntti;Barry Reisberg;Gustavo Roman

  • Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    Daniel I. Kaufer;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Patrick Ketchel;Patrick Ketchel;Vanessa Smith;Vanessa Smith

  • Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury with Moderate Hypothermia

    Donald W. Marion;Louis E. Penrod;Sheryl F. Kelsey;Walter D. Obrist

  • Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Robert H. Mach;Sang-Yoon Lee

  • Diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Consensus statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer's Association, and the American Geriatrics Society.

    Gary W. Small;Peter V. Rabins;Patricia P. Barry;Neil S. Buckholtz

  • Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a National Football League player.

    Bennet I. Omalu;Steven T. DeKosky;Ryan L. Minster;M Ilyas Kamboh

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

  • Post-mortem Correlates of in Vivo PiB-PET Amyloid Imaging in a Typical Case of Alzheimer's Disease

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;William E. Klunk;Eric E. Abrahamson;Chester A. Mathis

  • Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study.

    Mary Ganguli;Hiroko H. Dodge;Changyu Shen;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Fibrillar amyloid-β burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen;Xiaofen Liu;Daniel Bandy

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez University of Pittsburgh
William E. Klunk
William E. Klunk University of Pittsburgh
Chester A. Mathis
Chester A. Mathis University of Pittsburgh
M. Ilyas Kamboh
M. Ilyas Kamboh University of Pittsburgh
Milos D. Ikonomovic
Milos D. Ikonomovic University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
James T. Becker
James T. Becker University of Pittsburgh
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh
Lewis H. Kuller
Lewis H. Kuller University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue online psych d programs to gain advanced expertise in clinical practice and psychological research. These programs offer flexibility and are designed for individuals seeking licensure as professional psychologists.

For those interested in therapy careers, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited provide a pathway to become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. These online options can often be completed in less time than traditional degrees, helping you start your career sooner.

If you’re eager to earn credentials quickly, accelerated bachelors degrees allow you to complete your studies at a faster pace – without sacrificing quality. This can be ideal for those ready to step into the workforce or pursue graduate study in neuroscience-related fields.

Finally, it’s important to consider future earning potential. Many neuroscience graduates explore the highest paid degrees to guide their decisions, ensuring their education leads to strong career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Steven T. DeKosky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles