World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 152 141 127 93 82 729 110311

Steven T. DeKosky publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven T. DeKosky between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven T. DeKosky published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 17.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2006. 49 of the 804 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2006. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 21 publications 1998: 25 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 31 publications 2005: 43 publications 2006: 50 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 35 publications 2009: 36 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 20 publications
1980 2025

804 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven T. DeKosky: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 5
1986 4
1987 3
1988 3
1989 4
1990 4
1991 2
1992 5
1993 6
1994 11
1995 17
1996 18
1997 21
1998 25
1999 19
2000 21
2001 20
2002 24
2003 29
2004 31
2005 43
2006 50
2007 28
2008 35
2009 36
2010 22
2011 15
2012 21
2013 22
2014 17
2015 8
2016 13
2017 10
2018 25
2019 19
2020 27
2021 28
2022 20
2023 37
2024 29
2025 20
Total 804
Download as CSV

Steven T. DeKosky publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven T. DeKosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 728–737 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 729 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5 729
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven T. DeKosky D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven T. DeKosky sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 152–153 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 152 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6 152
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in United States Leader Award

Overview

Steven T. DeKosky is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, physiology, neurology, and molecular biology. Their work encompasses a wide range of topics related to brain health and cognitive function.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

They have published extensively in several scientific venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • GeroScience
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Steven T. DeKosky consist of:

  • The clinical promise of biomarkers of synapse damage or loss in Alzheimer's disease (2020), Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Diagnostic criteria for apathy in neurocognitive disorders (2021), Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • The Role of Resting-State Network Functional Connectivity in Cognitive Aging (2020), Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Preclinical and clinical biomarker studies of CT1812: A novel approach to Alzheimer's disease modification (2021), Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Brain and blood biomarkers of tauopathy and neuronal injury in humans and rats with neurobehavioral syndromes following blast exposure (2020), Molecular Psychiatry

Collaboration plays a significant role in their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Michael Marsiske
  • Ronald A. Cohen
  • Adam J. Woods
  • Andrew O'Shea
  • Gene E. Alexander

Best Publications

  • Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS–ADRDA criteria

    Bruno Dubois;Howard H. Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Steven T. DeKosky

  • The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease

    Marilyn S. Albert;Steven T. DeKosky;Dennis Dickson;Bruno Dubois

  • Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria

    Bruno Dubois;Bruno Dubois;Howard H Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Harald Hampel;Harald Hampel

  • Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: Correlation with cognitive severity

    Steven T. DeKosky;Stephen W. Scheff

  • Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and mild cognitive impairment: results from the cardiovascular health study.

    Constantine G. Lyketsos;Oscar Lopez;Beverly Jones;Annette L. Fitzpatrick

  • Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    R. C. Petersen;J.C. Stevens;M. Ganguli;E. G. Tangalos

  • Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon.

    Bruno Dubois;Howard H. Feldman;Howard H. Feldman;Howard H. Feldman;Claudia Jacova;Jeffrey L. Cummings

  • Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review) Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    R. S. Doody;J. C. Stevens;C. Beck;R. M. Dubinsky

  • Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Adam C. Naj;Gyungah Jun;Gary W. Beecham;Li-San Wang

  • Vascular Cognitive Impairment

    John T O'Brien;Timo Erkinjuntti;Barry Reisberg;Gustavo Roman

  • Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    Daniel I. Kaufer;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Patrick Ketchel;Patrick Ketchel;Vanessa Smith;Vanessa Smith

  • Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury with Moderate Hypothermia

    Donald W. Marion;Louis E. Penrod;Sheryl F. Kelsey;Walter D. Obrist

  • Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans.

    Anne M. Fagan;Mark A. Mintun;Robert H. Mach;Sang-Yoon Lee

  • Diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer disease and related disorders. Consensus statement of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, the Alzheimer's Association, and the American Geriatrics Society.

    Gary W. Small;Peter V. Rabins;Patricia P. Barry;Neil S. Buckholtz

  • Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a National Football League player.

    Bennet I. Omalu;Steven T. DeKosky;Ryan L. Minster;M Ilyas Kamboh

  • Frequent Amyloid Deposition Without Significant Cognitive Impairment Among the Elderly

    Howard Jay Aizenstein;Robert D. Nebes;Judith A. Saxton;Julie C. Price

  • [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease.

    M. A. Mintun;G. N. LaRossa;Y. I. Sheline;C. S. Dence

  • Post-mortem Correlates of in Vivo PiB-PET Amyloid Imaging in a Typical Case of Alzheimer's Disease

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;William E. Klunk;Eric E. Abrahamson;Chester A. Mathis

  • Mild cognitive impairment, amnestic type: an epidemiologic study.

    Mary Ganguli;Hiroko H. Dodge;Changyu Shen;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Fibrillar amyloid-β burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Reiman;Kewei Chen;Xiaofen Liu;Daniel Bandy

Frequent Co-Authors

Oscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez University of Pittsburgh
William E. Klunk
William E. Klunk University of Pittsburgh
Chester A. Mathis
Chester A. Mathis University of Pittsburgh
M. Ilyas Kamboh
M. Ilyas Kamboh University of Pittsburgh
Milos D. Ikonomovic
Milos D. Ikonomovic University of Pittsburgh
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
James T. Becker
James T. Becker University of Pittsburgh
Judith Saxton
Judith Saxton University of Pittsburgh
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh
Lewis H. Kuller
Lewis H. Kuller University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a range of online degrees and rewarding career paths. Many students pursue online psych d programs to gain advanced expertise in clinical practice and psychological research. These programs offer flexibility and are designed for individuals seeking licensure as professional psychologists.

For those interested in therapy careers, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited provide a pathway to become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. These online options can often be completed in less time than traditional degrees, helping you start your career sooner.

If you’re eager to earn credentials quickly, accelerated bachelors degrees allow you to complete your studies at a faster pace – without sacrificing quality. This can be ideal for those ready to step into the workforce or pursue graduate study in neuroscience-related fields.

Finally, it’s important to consider future earning potential. Many neuroscience graduates explore the highest paid degrees to guide their decisions, ensuring their education leads to strong career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Steven T. DeKosky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles