World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
16418
World Ranking
2882
National Ranking
1337

Milos D. Ikonomovic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milos D. Ikonomovic sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 212 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Milos D. Ikonomovic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milos D. Ikonomovic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Milos D. Ikonomovic is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, focusing primarily on medicine with significant attention to subfields such as physiology, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, and molecular biology.

Their research covers a range of topics, including dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, down syndrome and intellectual disability research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, medical imaging techniques and applications, and neuroscience and neuropharmacology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration

Among Milos D. Ikonomovic's recent papers are:

  • "Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes," 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • "Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease," 2023, Nature Medicine
  • "Brain injury-induced dysfunction of the blood brain barrier as a risk for dementia," 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • "Direct Comparison of the Tau PET Tracers18F-Flortaucipir and18F-MK-6240 in Human Subjects," 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Visual assessment of [18F]flutemetamol PET images can detect early amyloid pathology and grade its extent," 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Julia Kofler, Victor L. Villemagne, Ann D. Cohen, Howard Aizenstein, and Dana Tudorascu.

Best Publications

  • Post-mortem Correlates of in Vivo PiB-PET Amyloid Imaging in a Typical Case of Alzheimer's Disease

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;William E. Klunk;Eric E. Abrahamson;Chester A. Mathis

  • Upregulation of choline acetyltransferase activity in hippocampus and frontal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment.

    Steven T. Dekosky;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Scot D. Styren;Laurel A Beckett

  • Validating novel tau positron emission tomography tracer [F‐18]‐AV‐1451 (T807) on postmortem brain tissue

    Marta Marquié;Marta Marquié;Marc D. Normandin;Charles R. Vanderburg;Isabel M. Costantino

  • Alzheimer's pathology in human temporal cortex surgically excised after severe brain injury.

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;Kunihiro Uryu;Eric E. Abrahamson;John R. Ciallella

  • Binding of the Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Pittsburgh Compound-B Reflects the Amount of Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's Disease Brain But Not in Transgenic Mouse Brain

    William E. Klunk;Brian J. Lopresti;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Iliya M. Lefterov

  • Amyloid Deposition Begins in the Striatum of Presenilin-1 Mutation Carriers from Two Unrelated Pedigrees

    William E. Klunk;Julie C. Price;Chester A. Mathis;Nicholas D. Tsopelas

  • Traumatic brain injury: football, warfare, and long-term effects.

    Steven T DeKosky;Milos D Ikonomovic;Sam Gandy

  • Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes

    Adam S Fleisher;Michael J Pontecorvo;Michael D Devous;Ming Lu

  • Dissecting phenotypic traits linked to human resilience to Alzheimer’s pathology

    Beatriz G. Perez-Nievas;Thor D. Stein;Hwan Ching Tai;Oriol Dols-Icardo

  • The Binding of 2-(4′-Methylaminophenyl)Benzothiazole to Postmortem Brain Homogenates Is Dominated by the Amyloid Component

    William E. Klunk;Yanming Wang;Guo feng Huang;Manik L. Debnath

  • Human cholinergic basal forebrain: chemoanatomy and neurologic dysfunction

    Elliott J. Mufson;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Phase 3 Trial of Flutemetamol Labeled With Radioactive Fluorine 18 Imaging and Neuritic Plaque Density

    Craig Curtis;Jose E. Gamez;Upinder Singh;Carl H. Sadowsky

  • Acute and chronic traumatic encephalopathies: pathogenesis and biomarkers

    Steven T. DeKosky;Kaj Blennow;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Sam Gandy

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [11C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology

    Renaud La Joie;Nagehan Ayakta;Nagehan Ayakta;William W. Seeley;Ewa Borys

  • Mild cognitive impairment: pathology and mechanisms

    Elliott J. Mufson;Lester Binder;Scott E. Counts;Steven T. DeKosky

  • 22R-Hydroxycholesterol and 9-cis-Retinoic Acid Induce ATP-binding Cassette Transporter A1 Expression and Cholesterol Efflux in Brain Cells and Decrease Amyloid β Secretion

    Radosveta P. Koldamova;Iliya M. Lefterov;Milos D. Ikonomovic;John Skoko

  • Absence of Pittsburgh Compound B Detection of Cerebral Amyloid β in a Patient With Clinical, Cognitive, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Alzheimer Disease: A Case Report

    Nigel J. Cairns;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Tammie Benzinger;Martha Storandt

  • Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Scott E. Counts;Scott E. Counts;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Natosha Mercado;Irving E. Vega

  • Pathological correlations of [F-18]-AV-1451 imaging in non-alzheimer tauopathies

    Marta Marquié;Marc D. Normandin;Avery C. Meltzer;Michael Siao Tick Chong

  • Association of Increased Cortical Soluble Aβ42 Levels With Diffuse Plaques After Severe Brain Injury in Humans

    Steven T. DeKosky;Eric E. Abrahamson;John R. Ciallella;William R. Paljug

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
Elliott J. Mufson
Elliott J. Mufson Barrow Neurological Institute
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Stephen D. Ginsberg
Stephen D. Ginsberg Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
David M. Armstrong
David M. Armstrong National Institutes of Health
Sylvia E. Perez
Sylvia E. Perez Barrow Neurological Institute
Joanne Wuu
Joanne Wuu University of Miami
Scott E. Counts
Scott E. Counts Michigan State University
C. Edward Dixon
C. Edward Dixon University of Pittsburgh
Beth E. Snitz
Beth E. Snitz University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring neuroscience studies in the USA, it's essential to consider how your interests can align with broader most lucrative college degrees. Fields like biomedical engineering, computer science, and data analytics often intersect with neuroscience and can open doors to high-paying roles in both healthcare and technology sectors.

Many students are now opting for flexible, affordable education pathways. If cost is a concern, explore options at cheap online colleges that offer FAFSA acceptance. This can help minimize student debt while allowing you to pursue your passion for neuroscience or related fields.

Beyond degrees, earning certifications that pay well in areas such as data science, healthcare, or project management can boost your employability. These certifications are valuable additions to your neuroscience credentials.

Additionally, those seeking accessible education options should check out the easiest online degrees and majors. These can provide a solid foundation for entering the neuroscience field or pivoting into interdisciplinary career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Milos D. Ikonomovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles