World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 67 2882 2635 1337 1202 212 16418

Milos D. Ikonomovic publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Milos D. Ikonomovic between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Milos D. Ikonomovic published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2025. 42 of the 290 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2025. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 41 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

290 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Milos D. Ikonomovic: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 4
1996 2
1997 5
1998 2
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 9
2004 12
2005 9
2006 7
2007 6
2008 5
2009 9
2010 3
2011 7
2012 9
2013 12
2014 11
2015 9
2016 11
2017 13
2018 9
2019 14
2020 4
2021 8
2022 5
2023 18
2024 32
2025 41
2026 1
Total 290
Download as CSV

Milos D. Ikonomovic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milos D. Ikonomovic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 212 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 212
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Milos D. Ikonomovic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Milos D. Ikonomovic sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239 67
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Milos D. Ikonomovic is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medical research, focusing primarily on medicine with significant attention to subfields such as physiology, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, and molecular biology.

Their research covers a range of topics, including dementia and cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, down syndrome and intellectual disability research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, medical imaging techniques and applications, and neuroscience and neuropharmacology.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Molecular Neurodegeneration

Among Milos D. Ikonomovic's recent papers are:

  • "Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes," 2020, JAMA Neurology
  • "Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease," 2023, Nature Medicine
  • "Brain injury-induced dysfunction of the blood brain barrier as a risk for dementia," 2020, Experimental Neurology
  • "Direct Comparison of the Tau PET Tracers18F-Flortaucipir and18F-MK-6240 in Human Subjects," 2021, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • "Visual assessment of [18F]flutemetamol PET images can detect early amyloid pathology and grade its extent," 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Julia Kofler, Victor L. Villemagne, Ann D. Cohen, Howard Aizenstein, and Dana Tudorascu.

Best Publications

  • Post-mortem Correlates of in Vivo PiB-PET Amyloid Imaging in a Typical Case of Alzheimer's Disease

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;William E. Klunk;Eric E. Abrahamson;Chester A. Mathis

  • Upregulation of choline acetyltransferase activity in hippocampus and frontal cortex of elderly subjects with mild cognitive impairment.

    Steven T. Dekosky;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Scot D. Styren;Laurel A Beckett

  • Validating novel tau positron emission tomography tracer [F‐18]‐AV‐1451 (T807) on postmortem brain tissue

    Marta Marquié;Marta Marquié;Marc D. Normandin;Charles R. Vanderburg;Isabel M. Costantino

  • Alzheimer's pathology in human temporal cortex surgically excised after severe brain injury.

    Milos D. Ikonomovic;Kunihiro Uryu;Eric E. Abrahamson;John R. Ciallella

  • Binding of the Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Pittsburgh Compound-B Reflects the Amount of Amyloid-β in Alzheimer's Disease Brain But Not in Transgenic Mouse Brain

    William E. Klunk;Brian J. Lopresti;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Iliya M. Lefterov

  • Amyloid Deposition Begins in the Striatum of Presenilin-1 Mutation Carriers from Two Unrelated Pedigrees

    William E. Klunk;Julie C. Price;Chester A. Mathis;Nicholas D. Tsopelas

  • Traumatic brain injury: football, warfare, and long-term effects.

    Steven T DeKosky;Milos D Ikonomovic;Sam Gandy

  • Positron Emission Tomography Imaging With [18F]flortaucipir and Postmortem Assessment of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes

    Adam S Fleisher;Michael J Pontecorvo;Michael D Devous;Ming Lu

  • Dissecting phenotypic traits linked to human resilience to Alzheimer’s pathology

    Beatriz G. Perez-Nievas;Thor D. Stein;Hwan Ching Tai;Oriol Dols-Icardo

  • The Binding of 2-(4′-Methylaminophenyl)Benzothiazole to Postmortem Brain Homogenates Is Dominated by the Amyloid Component

    William E. Klunk;Yanming Wang;Guo feng Huang;Manik L. Debnath

  • Human cholinergic basal forebrain: chemoanatomy and neurologic dysfunction

    Elliott J. Mufson;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Phase 3 Trial of Flutemetamol Labeled With Radioactive Fluorine 18 Imaging and Neuritic Plaque Density

    Craig Curtis;Jose E. Gamez;Upinder Singh;Carl H. Sadowsky

  • Acute and chronic traumatic encephalopathies: pathogenesis and biomarkers

    Steven T. DeKosky;Kaj Blennow;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Sam Gandy

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Multisite study of the relationships between antemortem [11C]PIB-PET Centiloid values and postmortem measures of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology

    Renaud La Joie;Nagehan Ayakta;Nagehan Ayakta;William W. Seeley;Ewa Borys

  • Mild cognitive impairment: pathology and mechanisms

    Elliott J. Mufson;Lester Binder;Scott E. Counts;Steven T. DeKosky

  • 22R-Hydroxycholesterol and 9-cis-Retinoic Acid Induce ATP-binding Cassette Transporter A1 Expression and Cholesterol Efflux in Brain Cells and Decrease Amyloid β Secretion

    Radosveta P. Koldamova;Iliya M. Lefterov;Milos D. Ikonomovic;John Skoko

  • Absence of Pittsburgh Compound B Detection of Cerebral Amyloid β in a Patient With Clinical, Cognitive, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers of Alzheimer Disease: A Case Report

    Nigel J. Cairns;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Tammie Benzinger;Martha Storandt

  • Biomarkers for the Early Detection and Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Scott E. Counts;Scott E. Counts;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Natosha Mercado;Irving E. Vega

  • Pathological correlations of [F-18]-AV-1451 imaging in non-alzheimer tauopathies

    Marta Marquié;Marc D. Normandin;Avery C. Meltzer;Michael Siao Tick Chong

  • Association of Increased Cortical Soluble Aβ42 Levels With Diffuse Plaques After Severe Brain Injury in Humans

    Steven T. DeKosky;Eric E. Abrahamson;John R. Ciallella;William R. Paljug

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven T. DeKosky
Steven T. DeKosky University of Florida
William E. Klunk
William E. Klunk University of Pittsburgh
Chester A. Mathis
Chester A. Mathis University of Pittsburgh
Elliott J. Mufson
Elliott J. Mufson Barrow Neurological Institute
Julie C. Price
Julie C. Price Harvard University
Oscar L. Lopez
Oscar L. Lopez University of Pittsburgh
Ronald L. Hamilton
Ronald L. Hamilton University of Pittsburgh
Patrick M. Kochanek
Patrick M. Kochanek University of Pittsburgh
Stephen D. Ginsberg
Stephen D. Ginsberg Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
David M. Armstrong
David M. Armstrong National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring neuroscience studies in the USA, it's essential to consider how your interests can align with broader most lucrative college degrees. Fields like biomedical engineering, computer science, and data analytics often intersect with neuroscience and can open doors to high-paying roles in both healthcare and technology sectors.

Many students are now opting for flexible, affordable education pathways. If cost is a concern, explore options at cheap online colleges that offer FAFSA acceptance. This can help minimize student debt while allowing you to pursue your passion for neuroscience or related fields.

Beyond degrees, earning certifications that pay well in areas such as data science, healthcare, or project management can boost your employability. These certifications are valuable additions to your neuroscience credentials.

Additionally, those seeking accessible education options should check out the easiest online degrees and majors. These can provide a solid foundation for entering the neuroscience field or pivoting into interdisciplinary career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Milos D. Ikonomovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles