World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
14976
World Ranking
2246
National Ranking
1067

Stephen D. Ginsberg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Ginsberg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 200 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephen D. Ginsberg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Ginsberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen D. Ginsberg is affiliated with the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on physiology, molecular biology, neurology, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

Their work covers a range of topics including Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, Down syndrome and intellectual disability research, dementia and cognitive impairment research, computational drug discovery methods, tryptophan and brain disorders, and bioinformatics and genomic networks.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications

Co-authors who frequently collaborate with Stephen D. Ginsberg are:

  • Melissa J. Alldred
  • Elliott J. Mufson
  • Gabriela Chiosis
  • Sang H. Lee
  • Adriana Heguy

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • "Type I interferon response drives neuroinflammation and synapse loss in Alzheimer disease," 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • "Mitovesicles are a novel population of extracellular vesicles of mitochondrial origin altered in Down syndrome," 2021, Science Advances
  • "The epichaperome is a mediator of toxic hippocampal stress and leads to protein connectivity-based dysfunction," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Effects of early-life penicillin exposure on the gut microbiome and frontal cortex and amygdala gene expression," 2021, iScience
  • "A method for quantification of vesicular compartments within cells using 3D reconstructed confocal z-stacks: Comparison of ImageJ and Imaris to count early endosomes within basal forebrain cholinergic neurons," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Best Publications

  • Cholinergic system during the progression of Alzheimer's disease: therapeutic implications.

    Elliott J Mufson;Scott E Counts;Sylvia E Perez;Stephen D Ginsberg

  • Type I interferon response drives neuroinflammation and synapse loss in Alzheimer disease

    Ethan R. Roy;Baiping Wang;Ying-Wooi Wan;Gabriel S. Chiu

  • Expression profile of transcripts in Alzheimer's disease tangle-bearing CA1 neurons.

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Scott E. Hemby;Virginia M.‐Y. Lee;James H. Eberwine

  • Human cholinergic basal forebrain: chemoanatomy and neurologic dysfunction

    Elliott J. Mufson;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Milos D. Ikonomovic;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Autophagy flux in CA1 neurons of Alzheimer hippocampus: Increased induction overburdens failing lysosomes to propel neuritic dystrophy.

    Matteo Bordi;Martin J Berg;Panaiyur S Mohan;Corrinne M Peterhoff

  • Alzheimer’s-related endosome dysfunction in Down syndrome is Aβ-independent but requires APP and is reversed by BACE-1 inhibition

    Ying Jiang;Kerry A. Mullaney;Corrinne M. Peterhoff;Shaoli Che

  • Locus coeruleus cellular and molecular pathology during the progression of Alzheimer’s disease

    Sarah C. Kelly;Bin He;Sylvia E. Perez;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Stephen D. Ginsberg

  • Mild cognitive impairment: pathology and mechanisms

    Elliott J. Mufson;Lester Binder;Scott E. Counts;Steven T. DeKosky

  • Down regulation of trk but not p75NTR gene expression in single cholinergic basal forebrain neurons mark the progression of Alzheimer's disease

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Shaoli Che;Joanne Wuu;Scott E. Counts

  • Microarray Analysis of Hippocampal CA1 Neurons Implicates Early Endosomal Dysfunction During Alzheimer's Disease Progression

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Melissa J. Alldred;Melissa J. Alldred;Scott E. Counts;Anne M. Cataldo

  • Gene Expression Profile for Schizophrenia: Discrete Neuron Transcription Patterns in the Entorhinal Cortex

    Scott E. Hemby;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Brian Brunk;Steven E. Arnold

  • Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor depends on amyloid aggregation state in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's disease

    Shiyong Peng;Diego J. Garzon;Diego J. Garzon;Monica Marchese;William Klein

  • An essential component in steroid synthesis, the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, is expressed in discrete regions of the brain.

    Steven R. King;Pulak R. Manna;Tomohiro Ishii;Peter J. Syapin

  • Reduction of cortical TrkA but not p75(NTR) protein in early-stage Alzheimer's disease.

    Scott E. Counts;Muhammad Nadeem;Joanne Wuu;Stephen D. Ginsberg

  • Predominance of neuronal mRNAs in individual Alzheimer's disease senile plaques

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Peter B. Crino;Scott E. Hemby;Jeremy A. Weingarten

  • Sequestration of RNA in Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Peter B. Crino;Virginia M.-Y. Lee;James H. Eberwine

  • Target identification for CNS diseases by transcriptional profiling.

    C Anthony Altar;Marquis P Vawter;Stephen D Ginsberg

  • PRESENCE AND PHOSPHORYLATION OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS IN DEVELOPING DENDRITES

    Peter Crino;Kamran Khodakhah;Kevin Becker;Stephen Ginsberg

  • Mechanisms underlying insulin deficiency-induced acceleration of β-amyloidosis in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Latha Devi;Melissa J. Alldred;Melissa J. Alldred;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Stephen D. Ginsberg;Masuo Ohno;Masuo Ohno

  • Hippocampal plasticity during the progression of Alzheimer's disease

    E.J. Mufson;L. Mahady;D. Waters;S.E. Counts

  • Down regulation of trk but not p75 NTR gene expression in single cholinergic basal forebrain neurons mark the progression of Alzheimer's disease

    Stephen D. Ginsberg;Shaoli Che;Joanne Wuu;Scott E. Counts

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliott J. Mufson
Elliott J. Mufson Barrow Neurological Institute
Scott E. Counts
Scott E. Counts Michigan State University
Ralph A. Nixon
Ralph A. Nixon Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Sylvia E. Perez
Sylvia E. Perez Barrow Neurological Institute
Paul M. Mathews
Paul M. Mathews New York University
Barbara J. Strupp
Barbara J. Strupp Cornell University
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Milos D. Ikonomovic
Milos D. Ikonomovic University of Pittsburgh
Scott E. Hemby
Scott E. Hemby High Point University
Joanne Wuu
Joanne Wuu University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide array of related fields, many of which now offer flexible and affordable online degree options. For those interested in mental health support, affordable online MFT programs provide a pathway toward becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. These programs combine counseling skills with foundational neuroscience perspectives.

If you are considering further specialization, you may wonder how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology. Costs and financial aid can vary, so it’s essential to research your options carefully. For those just starting, earning a bachelors in psychology online is a popular and flexible choice, providing a strong foundation for various neuroscience-related careers.

Social work is another meaningful career path that often intersects with neuroscience and psychology, especially when focusing on mental health. Look for a 1 year online master's in social work for a fast-track option into this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen D. Ginsberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles