World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barbara J. Strupp

Barbara J. Strupp

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6386
World Ranking
7685
National Ranking
3298

Barbara J. Strupp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Strupp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Barbara J. Strupp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara J. Strupp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara J. Strupp is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of medicine and environmental science, with an emphasis on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis, as well as psychiatry and mental health. Their work also touches on pediatrics, perinatology, child health, public health, environmental and occupational health, and obstetrics and gynecology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), heavy metal exposure and toxicity, as well as birth, development, and health. Additional research topics include maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, memory and neural mechanisms, and Down syndrome and intellectual disability research.

Barbara J. Strupp's notable recent papers include:

  • "Animal Models of Childhood Exposure to Lead or Manganese: Evidence for Impaired Attention, Impulse Control, and Affect Regulation and Assessment of Potential Therapies" (2023, Neurotherapeutics)
  • "Maternal Choline Supplementation as a Potential Therapy for Down Syndrome: Assessment of Effects Throughout the Lifespan" (2021, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience)
  • "Developmental Manganese Exposure Causes Lasting Attention Deficits Accompanied by Dysregulation of mTOR Signaling and Catecholaminergic Gene Expression in Brain Prefrontal Cortex" (2023, bioRxiv - Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Maternal choline supplementation lessens the behavioral dysfunction produced by developmental manganese exposure in a rodent model of ADHD" (2024, Neurotoxicology and Teratology)
  • "Methylphenidate alleviates cognitive dysfunction caused by early manganese exposure: Role of catecholaminergic receptors" (2024, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry)

Their frequent coauthors include Donald R. Smith, Stéphane A. Beaudin, Shanna L. Howard, Sophie A Roth, and Angie Lam. Collaborations with these researchers have been repeated several times, indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Barbara J. Strupp's publications are often found in prominent venues within their fields such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurotoxicology and Teratology
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Neurotherapeutics

Their body of work integrates clinical and environmental perspectives to study how exposure to environmental toxins like lead and manganese can impact neurodevelopmental disorders such as ADHD. The research also explores therapeutic interventions including maternal choline supplementation and pharmacological treatments to alleviate cognitive and behavioral dysfunction associated with toxic exposures and developmental disorders.

Best Publications

  • Dietary fat and the regulation of energy intake in human subjects.

    L Lissner;D A Levitsky;B J Strupp;H J Kalkwarf

  • Malnutrition and the Brain: Changing Concepts, Changing Concerns

    David A. Levitsky;Barbara J. Strupp

  • Weight loss on a low-fat diet : consequence of the imprecision of the control of food intake in humans

    Anne Kendall;David A Levitsky;Barbara J Strupp;Lauren Lissner

  • Enduring cognitive effects of early malnutrition: a theoretical reappraisal.

    Barbara J. Strupp;David A. Levitsky

  • Evidence for social anxiety and impaired social cognition in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

    Caitlyn H. McNaughton;Jisook Moon;Myla S. Strawderman;Kenneth N. Maclean

  • Body composition and energy intake: do overweight women overeat and underreport?

    Lauren Lissner;Jean-Pierre Habicht;Barbara J Strupp;DavidA Levitsky

  • Perinatal choline supplementation improves cognitive functioning and emotion regulation in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome

    Jisook Moon;May Chen;Shruti U. Gandhy;Myla Strawderman

  • Vitamin B-12 and Cognition in Children.

    Sudha Venkatramanan;Ilianna E Armata;Barbara J Strupp;Julia L Finkelstein

  • Maternal choline supplementation improves spatial learning and adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.

    Ramon Velazquez;Jessica A. Ash;Brian E. Powers;Christy M. Kelley

  • Social transmission of food preferences in adult hooded rats (Rattus norvegicus)

    Barbara J. Strupp;David A. Levitsky

  • Tolerance to anorectic drugs: pharmacological or artifactual.

    David A. Levitsky;Barbara J. Strupp;Janet Lupoli

  • Attentional dysfunction, impulsivity, and resistance to change in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

    J. Moon;A. E. Beaudin;S. Verosky;L. L. Driscoll

  • Spatial reversal learning in Aroclor 1254-exposed rats: sex-specific deficits in associative ability and inhibitory control.

    John J. Widholm;Geoff B. Clarkson;Barbara J. Strupp;Kevin M. Crofton

  • Prenatal cocaine exposure impairs selective attention: Evidence from serial reversal and extradimensional shift tasks

    H. Garavan;R. E. Morgan;C. F. Mactutus;D. A. Levitsky

  • Maternal choline supplementation improves spatial mapping and increases basal forebrain cholinergic neuron number and size in aged Ts65Dn mice.

    Jessica A. Ash;Ramon Velazquez;Christy M. Kelley;Brian E. Powers

  • Cognitive processing in anorexia nervosa: a disturbance in automatic information processing

    Barbara J. Strupp;Herbert Weingartner;Walter Kaye;Harry Gwirtsman

  • Effects of perinatal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on spatial and visual reversal learning in rats.

    John J. Widholm;Byung Woun Seo;Barbara J. Strupp;Richard F. Seegal;Richard F. Seegal

  • Analyses of response patterns clarify lead effects in olfactory reversal and extradimensional shift tasks: assessment of inhibitory control, associative ability, and memory.

    Julie A. Hilson;Barbara J. Strupp

  • Imprecise control of energy intake : Absence of a reduction in food intake following overfeeding in young adults

    David A. Levitsky;Eva Obarzanek;Eva Obarzanek;Gordana Mrdjenovic;Barbara J. Strupp

  • Succimer chelation improves learning, attention, and arousal regulation in lead-exposed rats but produces lasting cognitive impairment in the absence of lead exposure.

    Diane E. Stangle;Donald R. Smith;Stephane A. Beaudin;Myla S. Strawderman

  • Early lead exposure produces lasting changes in sustained attention, response initiation, and reactivity to errors.

    Russell E Morgan;Hugh Garavan;Elliott G Smith;Lori L Driscoll

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen D. Ginsberg
Stephen D. Ginsberg Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Rosemarie M. Booze
Rosemarie M. Booze University of South Carolina
Charles F. Mactutus
Charles F. Mactutus University of South Carolina
Elliott J. Mufson
Elliott J. Mufson Barrow Neurological Institute
Hugh Garavan
Hugh Garavan University of Vermont
Sally Grantham-McGregor
Sally Grantham-McGregor University College London
Herbert Weingartner
Herbert Weingartner National Institutes of Health
Theodore D. Wachs
Theodore D. Wachs Purdue University West Lafayette
Patrick J. Stover
Patrick J. Stover Texas A&M University
Adele Diamond
Adele Diamond University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often sparks interest in a variety of related fields and career opportunities. Many students consider a bachelor of psychology online as a foundational pathway. This route introduces major psychological theories and research methods, making it a strong option for those keen on brain science.

For students interested in broader mental health and community impact, the easiest social work programs to get into offer streamlined entry into professional social work roles, focusing on both theory and real-world applications. Meanwhile, those pursuing clinical practice can explore psyd programs, which prepare graduates for clinical psychology roles with a practical, patient-focused approach.

If your passion lies in family and relationship dynamics, online mft programs accredited provide an accessible path to licensure as a marriage and family therapist. From affordable undergraduate degrees to advanced clinical doctorates, these diverse programs create multiple career pathways connected to neuroscience, mental health, and human behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara J. Strupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles