World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
South Africa
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 81 345 296 6 5 402 37075

Linda Richter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Richter between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Richter published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 12.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2022. 11 of the 471 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2022. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications
1988 2025

471 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Richter: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 2
1990 5
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 1
1997 6
1998 3
1999 6
2000 10
2001 8
2002 10
2003 4
2004 18
2005 13
2006 19
2007 10
2008 19
2009 22
2010 18
2011 17
2012 19
2013 21
2014 24
2015 14
2016 21
2017 17
2018 19
2019 25
2020 19
2021 30
2022 31
2023 23
2024 8
2025 3
Total 471
Download as CSV

Linda Richter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Richter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 394–403 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 402 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27 402
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Richter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Richter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18 81
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in South Africa Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in South Africa Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in South Africa Leader Award

Overview

Linda Richter is affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Nutrition and Dietetics, Safety Research, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's scholarly output includes numerous papers addressing critical topics related to child health and nutrition. Key research areas include Child Nutrition and Water Access, Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare, Birth, Development, and Health, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues, and Infant Development and Preterm Care.

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on early childhood and maternal health issues. Notable publications include:

  • "Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world" (2023, The Lancet)
  • "Effects of the Global Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic on Early Childhood Development: Short- and Long-Term Risks and Mitigating Program and Policy Actions" (2020, The Journal of Pediatrics)
  • "Marketing of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy" (2023, The Lancet)
  • "Inequalities in early childhood care and development in low/middle-income countries: 2010-2018" (2020, BMJ Global Health)
  • "Global estimates of the implications of COVID-19-related preprimary school closures for children's instructional access, development, learning, and economic wellbeing" (2021, Child Development)

Linda Richter frequently collaborates with several coauthors, indicating a broad network of research partnerships. Frequent coauthors include Shane A. Norris, Aryeh D. Stein, Reynaldo Martorell, Linda S. Adair, and Alan Stein.

The scientist's work is published across a variety of venues, demonstrating a consistent engagement with both regional and international scholarly audiences. Their most common publication venues are UNC Libraries, The Lancet, BMJ Open, SSRN Electronic Journal, and BMJ Global Health.

Best Publications

  • Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital.

    Cesar G. Victora;Linda S Adair;Caroline H.D. Fall;Pedro C. Hallal

  • Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries

    Sally Grantham-McGregor;Yin Bun Cheung;Santiago Cueto;Paul Glewwe

  • Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

    Nigel C Rollins;Nita Bhandari;Nemat Hajeebhoy;Susan Horton

  • Inequality in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development

    Susan P Walker;Theodore D Wachs;Sally Grantham-McGregor;Maureen M Black

  • Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better

    Thomas J Coates;Linda Richter;Carlos Caceres

  • Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development

    Linda M Richter;Bernadette Daelmans;Joan Lombardi;Jody Heymann

  • Risk of childhood undernutrition related to small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries

    Parul Christian;Sun Eun Lee;Moira Donahue Angel;Linda S. Adair

  • Risk of poor development in young children in low-income and middle-income countries: an estimation and analysis at the global, regional, and country level.

    Chunling Lu;Maureen M Black;Maureen M Black;Linda M Richter

  • Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration)

    Caroline H D Fall;Harshpal Singh Sachdev;Clive Osmond;Maria Clara Restrepo-Mendez

  • An Integrated Scientific Framework for Child Survival and Early Childhood Development

    Jack P. Shonkoff;Linda Richter;Jacques van der Gaag;Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta

  • Cohort Profile: Mandela's children: The 1990 birth to twenty study in South Africa

    Linda Richter;Shane Norris;John Pettifor;Derek Yach

  • Baba : men and fatherhood in South Africa

    L. Richter;R. Morrell

  • Early childhood development: the foundation of sustainable development

    Bernadette Daelmans;Gary L. Darmstadt;Joan Lombardi;Maureen M. Black;Maureen M. Black

  • Weight Gain in the First Two Years of Life Is an Important Predictor of Schooling Outcomes in Pooled Analyses from Five Birth Cohorts from Low- and Middle-Income Countries

    Reynaldo Martorell;Bernardo L. Horta;Linda S. Adair;Aryeh D Stein

  • Maternal height and child growth patterns.

    O. Yaw Addo;Aryeh D. Stein;Caroline H. Fall;Denise P. Gigante

  • Gender norms and health: insights from global survey data

    Ann M Weber;Beniamino Cislaghi;Valerie Meausoone;Safa Abdalla

  • Effects of the Global Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic on Early Childhood Development: Short- and Long-Term Risks and Mitigating Program and Policy Actions.

    Hirokazu Yoshikawa;Alice J. Wuermli;Pia Rebello Britto;Benard Dreyer

  • Community-based intervention to increase HIV testing and case detection in people aged 16–32 years in Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Thailand (NIMH Project Accept, HPTN 043): a randomised study

    Michael Sweat;Stephen Morin;David Celentano;Marta Mulawa

  • Nonmedical use of prescription opioids among teenagers in the United States: Trends and correlates

    Hung-En Sung;Linda Richter;Roger Vaughan;Patrick B. Johnson

  • Maternal postnatal depression and children's growth and behaviour during the early years of life: exploring the interaction between physical and mental health

    Bilal Avan;Linda M Richter;Paul G Ramchandani;Shane A Norris

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Stein
Alan Stein University of Oxford
Thomas J. Coates
Thomas J. Coates University of California, Los Angeles
Reynaldo Martorell
Reynaldo Martorell Emory University
Glenda Gray
Glenda Gray South African Medical Research Council
Cesar G. Victora
Cesar G. Victora Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Nuala McGrath
Nuala McGrath University of Southampton
Caroline H.D. Fall
Caroline H.D. Fall University of Southampton
Linda S. Adair
Linda S. Adair University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Deborah Donnell
Deborah Donnell Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Marie-Louise Newell
Marie-Louise Newell University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up numerous flexible career paths—especially through online study. Prospective students often seek an accredited online psychology degree to kickstart careers in counseling, human services, or research. These programs offer affordability and flexibility, making them accessible for working adults.

For those drawn to social work, finding the easiest MSW online program could be the best way to advance your qualifications quickly and start making an impact in communities. Graduate-level options like Psy D programs are ideal if you wish to pursue clinical psychology practice, offering advanced skills for direct patient care.

If your interests lean toward relationship or family therapy, seeking out the MFT online route can get you credentialed and into the workforce more quickly. With remote learning, these pathways allow you to balance studies with other commitments, while gaining credentials recognized by employers nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Richter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles