World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
11770
World Ranking
2574
National Ranking
37

Paulo De Marco publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo De Marco sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 298 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Paulo De Marco D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo De Marco sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paulo De Marco is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Goiás in Brazil. Their research contributions primarily focus on ecological and conservation sciences, addressing various aspects within nature conservation and ecological modeling.

Among the recent published works associated with their network are:

  • ENMTML: An R package for a straightforward construction of complex ecological niche models (2020, Environmental Modelling & Software)
  • Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy (2020, Ecological Modelling)
  • Overprediction of species distribution models in conservation planning: A still neglected issue with strong effects (2020, Biological Conservation)
  • Large-scale Degradation of the Tocantins-Araguaia River Basin (2021, Environmental Management)
  • Brazilian Amazon gold: indigenous land rights under risk (2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene)

Frequent coauthors in their collaborations include:

  • Leandro Juen
  • Leandro Schlemmer Brasil
  • Marciel Élio Rodrigues
  • Diogo Silva Vilela
  • Jean Carlos Santos

Paulo De Marco's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Datasets - Sistema SALVE - ICMBio
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Biological Conservation
  • Biodiversity and Conservation
  • Journal for Nature Conservation

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology

Main topics explored include:

  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Fish Biology and Ecology Studies

Best Publications

  • Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation

    Paulo De Marco;Caroline Corrêa Nóbrega

  • The Cerrado into-pieces: habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil.

    Fábio M.V. Carvalho;Paulo De Marco Júnior;Laerte G. Ferreira

  • Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams

    Jorge L. Nessimian;Eduardo M. Venticinque;Eduardo M. Venticinque;Jansen Zuanon;Paulo De Marco

  • Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures' pollination and production

    Paulo De Marco;Flávia Monteiro Coelho

  • The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity

    Ubirajara Oliveira;Adriano Pereira Paglia;Antonio D. Brescovit;Claudio J. B. de Carvalho

  • Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas

    Ubirajara Oliveira;Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho;Adriano Pereira Paglia;Antonio D. Brescovit

  • Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression

    L. Mauricio Bini;J. Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Thiago F.L.V.B. Rangel;Thomas S.B. Akre

  • Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology

    Bradford A. Hawkins;José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Luis Mauricio Bini;Paulo De Marco

  • Defying the curse of ignorance: perspectives in insect macroecology and conservation biogeography

    Jose Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho;Paulo De Marco;Bradford A. Hawkins

  • ENMTML: An R package for a straightforward construction of complex Ecological Niche Models

    André Felipe Alves de Andrade;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Adult odonate abundance and community assemblage measures as indicators of stream ecological integrity: A case study

    Daniel de paiva Silva;Paulo De Marco;Daniela Chaves Resende

  • Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion

    Paulo De Marco;José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho;Luis Mauricio Bini

  • Neotropical dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of ecological condition of small streams in the eastern Amazon

    José Max Barbosa de de Oliveira-Junior;José Max Barbosa de de Oliveira-Junior;Yulie Shimano;Toby Alan Gardner;Robert M. Hughes

  • A dark scenario for Cerrado plant species: effects of future climate, land-use, and protected areas ineffectiveness

    Santiago José Elías Velazco;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Fabricio Villalobos;Franklin Galvão;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Community assembly of adult odonates in tropical streams: an ecophysiological hypothesis.

    Paulo De Marco Júnior;Joana Darc Batista;Helena Soares Ramos Cabette

  • Something from nothing: Using landscape similarity and ecological niche modeling to find rare plant species

    Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira;Giselda Durigan;Paulo de Marco Júnior;A. Townsend Peterson

  • Can species distribution modelling provide estimates of population densities? A case study with jaguars in the Neotropics

    Natália M. Tôrres;Natália M. Tôrres;Paulo De Marco Júnior;Thiago Santos;Leandro Silveira

  • Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy

    Poliana Mendes;Poliana Mendes;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Santiago José Elías Velazco;André Felipe Alves de Andrade;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Efeito da alteração ambiental sobre comunidades de Odonata em riachos de Mata Atlântica de Minas Gerais, Brasil

    Patrícia Santos Ferreira-Peruquetti;Paulo De Marco Jr.

  • Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent.

    Santiago José Elías Velazco;Franklin Galvão;Fabricio Villalobos;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera

    Karina Dias-Silva;Helena S. R. Cabette;Leandro Juen;Paulo De Marco

  • Unprotecting the rare species: a niche-based gap analysis for odonates in a core Cerrado area

    Caroline C. Nóbrega;Paulo De Marco

Frequent Co-Authors

Leandro Juen
Leandro Juen Federal University of Para
Joaquín Hortal
Joaquín Hortal Spanish National Research Council
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho Universidade Federal de Goiás
Luis Mauricio Bini
Luis Mauricio Bini Universidade Federal de Goiás
Bradford A. Hawkins
Bradford A. Hawkins University of California, Irvine
John S. Ascher
John S. Ascher National University of Singapore
Claudio J. B. de Carvalho
Claudio J. B. de Carvalho Federal University of Paraná
Rafael Loyola
Rafael Loyola Universidade Federal de Goiás
Thiago F. Rangel
Thiago F. Rangel Universidade Federal de Goiás
Jansen Zuanon
Jansen Zuanon National Institute of Amazonian Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Ecology and Evolution opens up many related fields for online study. Programs like the graphic design degree online are becoming popular for students interested in communicating scientific concepts visually, an essential skill in environmental education and outreach.

For those wanting a broader approach, studying through an online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes allows you to blend ecology with policy, education, or data science pathways, widening your career options.

Graduate education is also accessible, and students thinking about further specialization can explore the cheapest online history master's degree to understand the evolution of natural sciences and conservation over time.

Finally, environmental scientists are often found in libraries and research centers—so if you're wondering how much does it cost to become a librarian, online library science degrees offer a cost-effective way to enter this vital supporting career.

Best Scientists Citing Paulo De Marco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles