World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 58 2574 2465 37 37 298 11770

Paulo De Marco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paulo De Marco between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paulo De Marco published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 29.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 868 publications in 2023. 37 of the 1,155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
200 400 600 800
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 868. Peak 868 publications in 2023. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 868 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 18 publications
1987 2025

1,155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paulo De Marco: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 10
2005 10
2006 1
2007 6
2008 10
2009 18
2010 18
2011 9
2012 15
2013 8
2014 9
2015 13
2016 12
2017 11
2018 19
2019 11
2020 21
2021 11
2022 12
2023 868
2024 19
2025 18
Total 1,155
Download as CSV

Paulo De Marco publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo De Marco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 297–301 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 298 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39 298
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Paulo De Marco D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo De Marco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137 58
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Paulo De Marco is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Goiás in Brazil. Their research contributions primarily focus on ecological and conservation sciences, addressing various aspects within nature conservation and ecological modeling.

Among the recent published works associated with their network are:

  • ENMTML: An R package for a straightforward construction of complex ecological niche models (2020, Environmental Modelling & Software)
  • Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy (2020, Ecological Modelling)
  • Overprediction of species distribution models in conservation planning: A still neglected issue with strong effects (2020, Biological Conservation)
  • Large-scale Degradation of the Tocantins-Araguaia River Basin (2021, Environmental Management)
  • Brazilian Amazon gold: indigenous land rights under risk (2020, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene)

Frequent coauthors in their collaborations include:

  • Leandro Juen
  • Leandro Schlemmer Brasil
  • Marciel Élio Rodrigues
  • Diogo Silva Vilela
  • Jean Carlos Santos

Paulo De Marco's publications often appear in venues such as:

  • Datasets - Sistema SALVE - ICMBio
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Biological Conservation
  • Biodiversity and Conservation
  • Journal for Nature Conservation

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology
  • Molecular Biology

Main topics explored include:

  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Fish Biology and Ecology Studies

Best Publications

  • Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: An approach based on virtual species simulation

    Paulo De Marco;Caroline Corrêa Nóbrega

  • The Cerrado into-pieces: habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil.

    Fábio M.V. Carvalho;Paulo De Marco Júnior;Laerte G. Ferreira

  • Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams

    Jorge L. Nessimian;Eduardo M. Venticinque;Eduardo M. Venticinque;Jansen Zuanon;Paulo De Marco

  • Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures' pollination and production

    Paulo De Marco;Flávia Monteiro Coelho

  • The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of Brazilian terrestrial biodiversity

    Ubirajara Oliveira;Adriano Pereira Paglia;Antonio D. Brescovit;Claudio J. B. de Carvalho

  • Biodiversity conservation gaps in the Brazilian protected areas

    Ubirajara Oliveira;Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho;Adriano Pereira Paglia;Antonio D. Brescovit

  • Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression

    L. Mauricio Bini;J. Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Thiago F.L.V.B. Rangel;Thomas S.B. Akre

  • Red herrings revisited: spatial autocorrelation and parameter estimation in geographical ecology

    Bradford A. Hawkins;José Alexandre F. Diniz-Filho;Luis Mauricio Bini;Paulo De Marco

  • Defying the curse of ignorance: perspectives in insect macroecology and conservation biogeography

    Jose Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho;Paulo De Marco;Bradford A. Hawkins

  • ENMTML: An R package for a straightforward construction of complex Ecological Niche Models

    André Felipe Alves de Andrade;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Adult odonate abundance and community assemblage measures as indicators of stream ecological integrity: A case study

    Daniel de paiva Silva;Paulo De Marco;Daniela Chaves Resende

  • Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion

    Paulo De Marco;José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho;Luis Mauricio Bini

  • Neotropical dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of ecological condition of small streams in the eastern Amazon

    José Max Barbosa de de Oliveira-Junior;José Max Barbosa de de Oliveira-Junior;Yulie Shimano;Toby Alan Gardner;Robert M. Hughes

  • A dark scenario for Cerrado plant species: effects of future climate, land-use, and protected areas ineffectiveness

    Santiago José Elías Velazco;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Fabricio Villalobos;Franklin Galvão;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Community assembly of adult odonates in tropical streams: an ecophysiological hypothesis.

    Paulo De Marco Júnior;Joana Darc Batista;Helena Soares Ramos Cabette

  • Something from nothing: Using landscape similarity and ecological niche modeling to find rare plant species

    Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira;Giselda Durigan;Paulo de Marco Júnior;A. Townsend Peterson

  • Can species distribution modelling provide estimates of population densities? A case study with jaguars in the Neotropics

    Natália M. Tôrres;Natália M. Tôrres;Paulo De Marco Júnior;Thiago Santos;Leandro Silveira

  • Dealing with overprediction in species distribution models: How adding distance constraints can improve model accuracy

    Poliana Mendes;Poliana Mendes;Santiago José Elías Velazco;Santiago José Elías Velazco;André Felipe Alves de Andrade;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • Efeito da alteração ambiental sobre comunidades de Odonata em riachos de Mata Atlântica de Minas Gerais, Brasil

    Patrícia Santos Ferreira-Peruquetti;Paulo De Marco Jr.

  • Using worldwide edaphic data to model plant species niches: An assessment at a continental extent.

    Santiago José Elías Velazco;Franklin Galvão;Fabricio Villalobos;Paulo De Marco Júnior

  • The influence of habitat integrity and physical-chemical water variables on the structure of aquatic and semi-aquatic Heteroptera

    Karina Dias-Silva;Helena S. R. Cabette;Leandro Juen;Paulo De Marco

  • Unprotecting the rare species: a niche-based gap analysis for odonates in a core Cerrado area

    Caroline C. Nóbrega;Paulo De Marco

Frequent Co-Authors

Leandro Juen
Leandro Juen Federal University of Para
Joaquín Hortal
Joaquín Hortal Spanish National Research Council
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho
José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho Universidade Federal de Goiás
Luis Mauricio Bini
Luis Mauricio Bini Universidade Federal de Goiás
Bradford A. Hawkins
Bradford A. Hawkins University of California, Irvine
John S. Ascher
John S. Ascher National University of Singapore
Claudio J. B. de Carvalho
Claudio J. B. de Carvalho Federal University of Paraná
Rafael Loyola
Rafael Loyola Universidade Federal de Goiás
Thiago F. Rangel
Thiago F. Rangel Universidade Federal de Goiás
Jansen Zuanon
Jansen Zuanon National Institute of Amazonian Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Ecology and Evolution opens up many related fields for online study. Programs like the graphic design degree online are becoming popular for students interested in communicating scientific concepts visually, an essential skill in environmental education and outreach.

For those wanting a broader approach, studying through an online interdisciplinary studies degree career outcomes allows you to blend ecology with policy, education, or data science pathways, widening your career options.

Graduate education is also accessible, and students thinking about further specialization can explore the cheapest online history master's degree to understand the evolution of natural sciences and conservation over time.

Finally, environmental scientists are often found in libraries and research centers—so if you're wondering how much does it cost to become a librarian, online library science degrees offer a cost-effective way to enter this vital supporting career.

Best Scientists Citing Paulo De Marco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles