A scientist’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a metric that selectively encompasses only publications and citations pertinent to the specific discipline under evaluation, thereby offering a focused perspective on a researcher’s impact within the field of Ecology and Evolution.
Scope of Research and Inclusion Criteria
The ranking derives from an extensive examination of 279,971 scientist profiles aggregated from diverse bibliometric data sources across all disciplines. For the domain of Ecology and Evolution specifically, 163 scientist profiles were scrutinized. To qualify for inclusion in this ranking, a researcher’s D-index had to meet a minimum threshold of 30, and the majority of their tier publications were required to be within the Ecology and Evolution discipline. Additionally, a scientist’s awards and professional achievements in the field were factored into their consideration.
The D-index threshold for prominence is set incrementally by 10 points according to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, ensuring that the top 1% of leading scholars are universally incorporated. Furthermore, to guarantee disciplinary focus and accuracy, the difference between a scientist’s general H-index and their D-index was maintained at a proximity of 30% or less.
Verification and Assessment Practices
Understanding the inherent limitations of raw bibliometric data as an absolute evaluative tool, the Research.com team undertook additional rigorous verification measures. Every scientist profile was manually reviewed and cross-verified against publications in a broad spectrum of credible and trustworthy academic sources. This meticulous approach reinforces the credibility and accuracy of the ranking.
While not directly influencing a researcher’s position in the ranking, the number of papers published in prestigious journals and conference proceedings is recognized as a valuable secondary indicator of a scientist’s scholarly contributions within Ecology and Evolution.
The final rankings are established based on each researcher’s D-index derived from the data gathered through OpenAlex and CrossRef, reflecting a well-validated and discipline-specific measure of research impact.
For an in-depth understanding of the data collection, validation, and ranking methodologies employed, please refer to our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Agenda
At Research.com, our mission is to inspire researchers, companies, and policymakers around the world to explore the trajectory and leadership of experts in their respective fields. This ranking serves as a vital tool for the global scientific community to identify and engage with leading authorities in specific disciplines, across countries, and within academic institutions.
By providing a transparent, rigorous, and methodologically sound ranking system, we aim to facilitate informed decision-making, foster collaboration, and elevate the visibility of exceptional scientific contributions internationally. The careful and meticulous work invested in this ranking reflects our commitment to supporting the advancement of scientific knowledge with integrity and precision.
